On the public citation graph
The Persistence of Formalism: Towards a Situated Critique beyond the Classic Separation of Powers
0 signed · 13 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2428415openalex-extracted
Disputing the Application of Laws: The Constitutionality of the Brazilian Statute Against Domestic Violence in the Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.02.010openalex-snapshot
Transparencia y buen gobierno en sanidad. También para salir de la crisis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137412000070openalex-snapshot
Can capitalism restrain public perceived corruption? Some evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11606/t.2.2012.tde-16052013-162225openalex-snapshot
Cortes supremas e sociedade civil na América Latina: estudo comparado Brasil, Argentina e Colômbia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12660/rda.v262.2013.8901openalex-snapshot
Direito e Consequência no Brasil: em busca de um discurso sobre o método
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1590/0103-335220141504openalex-snapshot
Judicialização da política no Brasil: ver além do constitucionalismo liberal para ver melhor
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987317256206openalex-snapshot
Democratizar a jurisdição constitucional? O caso das audiências públicas no Supremo Tribunal Federal
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1590/s0101-33002011000300001openalex-snapshot
"Judicialização da política": déficits explicativos e bloqueios normativistas
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31819/9783865279866openalex-snapshot
Democracia y reconfiguraciones contemporáneas del derecho en América Latina
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31819/9783865279866-009openalex-snapshot
Law and Public Sphere: Spaces for Interaction and Flow Directions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v2i3.44529openalex-snapshot
The vanishing boundaries between technical and political: normativism and pragmatism in the Brazilian courts’ adjustment of public policies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.9732/p.0034-7191.2013v107p267openalex-snapshot
What is the function of the double blind peer review system? Power of the State and self- -regulation in the evaluation of the Post-Graduate Programs - DOI: 10.9732/P.0034-7191.2013v107p267
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.