On the public citation graph

The Effect of Item Modality and Note-taking on EFL Learners’ Performance on a Listening Test

https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2015.7227
0 signed · 19 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2007.tb02043.xopenalex-snapshot
NOTETAKING STRATEGIES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO PERFORMANCE ON LISTENING COMPREHENSION AND COMMUNICATIVE ASSESSMENT TASKS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0980openalex-snapshot
Review and Process Effects of Spontaneous Note-Taking on Text Comprehension
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.002openalex-snapshot
Assessing listening for academic purposes: Defining and operationalising the test construct
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.12.003openalex-snapshot
To show or not to show: The effects of item stems and answer options on performance on a multiple-choice listening comprehension test
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.009openalex-snapshot
Gains to L2 listeners from reading while listening vs. listening only in comprehending short stories
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444807004338openalex-snapshot
Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.67.6.900openalex-snapshot
Note taking versus note having.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.86.3.323openalex-snapshot
College students' theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02083.xopenalex-snapshot
The Effects of Native Language vs. Target Language Captions on Foreign Language Students' DVD Video Comprehension
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i6.1001openalex-snapshot
Use of Video and Audio Texts in EFL Listening Test
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209355668openalex-snapshot
The effect of the use of video texts on ESL listening test-taker performance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209360671openalex-snapshot
Judgments of oral proficiency by non-native and native English speaking teacher raters: Competing or complementary constructs?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211415379openalex-snapshot
Note-taking quality and performance on an L2 academic listening test
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229100800105openalex-snapshot
The testing of listening comprehension: an introspective study1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229701400204openalex-snapshot
The effect of question preview in listening comprehension tests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229801500102openalex-snapshot
What do tests of listening comprehension test? - A retrospection study of EFL test-takers performing a multiple-choice task
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016669550openalex-snapshot
Does Modality Matter? The Effects of Reading, Listening, and Dual Modality on Comprehension

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4599465openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101346openalex-snapshot
Notetaking as validity evidence: A mixed-methods investigation of question preview in EAP listening assessment
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.