On the public citation graph
Cost-Minimizing Regulation of Sulfur Emissions: Regional Gains in Electric Power
0 signed · 52 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(72)90049-xopenalex-snapshot
Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.202309openalex-extracted
Abatement-Cost Heterogeneity and Anticipated Savings from Market-Based Environmental Policies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.318682openalex-extracted
Cost Heterogeneity and the Potential Savings from Market-Based Policies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.358700openalex-extracted
Estimating Pollution Abatement Costs: A Comparison of 'Stated' and 'Revealed' Approaches
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.951455openalex-extracted
Costs of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Case Study of India's Power Generation Sector
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/soej.70023openalex-snapshot
Unveiling Pollution Abatement Costs in Chinese Manufacturing Sector Using a By‐Production Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2000.1128openalex-snapshot
Has Economic Research Answered the Needs of Environmental Policy?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-37562-5_13openalex-snapshot
Benefits and Costs From Sulfur Dioxide Trading: A Distributional Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0832-4_2openalex-snapshot
Market-Based Mechanisms for Controlling Pollution: Lessons from the U.S.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01892-6openalex-snapshot
Cost of CO2 emission mitigation and its decomposition: evidence from coal-fired thermal power sector in India
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-018-0218-9openalex-snapshot
Shadow price of CO2 emissions in Indian thermal power sector
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04372-wopenalex-snapshot
Green cost performance measure of China’s thermal power industry: evidence from Chinese 30 provinces
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08066-yopenalex-snapshot
Study on environmental pollution loss measurement method of waste gas emits in Nanjing MV Industrial Park
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(91)90030-mopenalex-snapshot
Enforcement of pollution regulations in a declining industry
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/0140-9883(93)90043-qopenalex-snapshot
Capacity utilization and new source bias
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-59568-3.00008-0openalex-snapshot
Energy, the Environment and US Economic Growth
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.031openalex-snapshot
Effects of permitted effluent limits on environmental compliance levels
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.09.011openalex-snapshot
Pollution from the electric power sector in Japan and efficient pollution reduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.07.019openalex-snapshot
A new approach to measuring shadow price: Reconciling engineering and economic perspectives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.007openalex-snapshot
A Ten-Year Rule to guide the allocation of EU emission allowances
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.013openalex-snapshot
A bottom-up method to develop pollution abatement cost curves for coal-fired utility boilers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.016openalex-snapshot
Potential cost savings from internal/external CO2 emissions trading in the Korean electric power industry
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.008openalex-snapshot
How can Indian power plants cost-effectively meet the new sulfur emission standards? Policy evaluation using marginal abatement cost-curves
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.02.013openalex-snapshot
The shadow price of substitutable sulfur in the US electric power plant: A distance function approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-9883(02)00011-7openalex-snapshot
The effect of sulfur regulations on the U.S. electric power industry: a generalized cost approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-9883(99)00021-3openalex-snapshot
Estimation of the marginal abatement costs of airborne pollutants in Korea’s power generation sector
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s1573-4439(05)80014-4openalex-snapshot
Energy, The Environment, and Economic Growth
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511616587.010openalex-snapshot
Forward into the Past: Productivity Retrogression in the Electric Generating Industry
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021879330491openalex-snapshot
Cost Heterogeneity and the Potential Savings from Market-Based Policies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2020.1755596openalex-snapshot
A study on the CO2 marginal abatement cost of coal-fueled power plants: is the current price of China pilot carbon emission trading market rational?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/317681openalex-snapshot
Sulfur Dioxide Control by Electric Utilities: What Are the Gains from Trade?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aat084openalex-snapshot
The Benefits of Spatially Differentiated Regulation: The Response to Acid Rain by U.S. States Prior to the Acid Rain Program
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/cep/byi041openalex-snapshot
THE CASE FOR CROSS‐MEDIA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/cg-06-2013-0077openalex-snapshot
Combating climate change through organisational innovation: an empirical analysis of internal emission trading schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/iecec.1990.716534openalex-snapshot
A Comparison Of Direct Control And Market Based Policies For Controlling Emissions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12675openalex-snapshot
ESTIMATION OF PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES WITH OUTPUT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1142/s2010007815500050openalex-snapshot
COSTS OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ABATEMENT UNDER THE CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20230761openalex-snapshot
Is Air Pollution Regulation Too Lenient? Evidence from US Offset Markets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20190377openalex-snapshot
Dynamic Incentives and Permit Market Equilibrium in Cap-and-Trade Regulation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-1966openalex-snapshot
Sulfur Dioxide Control by Electric Utilities: What Are the Gains from Trade?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6262openalex-snapshot
The Cost Structure of the Clean Development Mechanism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.18459/v1openalex-snapshot
Study on the measurement method of environmental pollution loss based on shadow price model of waste gases emission from energy consumption in China's industrial parks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2172/10134961openalex-snapshot
Analysis of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990: A forecast of the electric utility industry response to Title IV, Acid Deposition Control
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.49397openalex-snapshot
The Cost Structure of Emissions Abatement through the Clean Development Mechanism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/3147007openalex-snapshot
The Costs of Water Pollution Regulation in the Pulp and Paper Industry
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3386/w28199openalex-snapshot
Is Air Pollution Regulation Too Lenient? Evidence from US Offset Markets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3386/w28962openalex-snapshot
Impacts of the Clean Air Act on the Power Sector from 1938-1994: Anticipation and Adaptation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/en11102738openalex-snapshot
A Sketch of Bolivia’s Potential Low-Carbon Power System Configurations. The Case of Applying Carbon Taxation and Lowering Financing Costs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/su11092504openalex-snapshot
Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/su11164468openalex-snapshot
A Study of the Feasibility of International ETS Cooperation between Shanghai and Korea from Environmental Efficiency and CO2 Marginal Abatement Cost Perspectives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/su6052584openalex-snapshot
Carbon Emissions Abatement Cost in China: Provincial Panel Data Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.33915/etd.2506openalex-snapshot
Economic evaluation of air pollution reduction of phase I power plants in West Virginia: An output distance function approach
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.