On the public citation graph

Nuclear Plenty and Limited War

https://doi.org/10.2307/20031223

0 signed · 19 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4166419openalex-extracted

The 'Melancholy Paradox' of Deterrence in the Nuclear Age, 1945-1965

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-020-00251-3openalex-snapshot

“It’s better to forget physics”: The Idea of the Tactical Nuclear Weapon in the Early Cold War

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108611794openalex-snapshot

Why America Loses Wars

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108611794.001openalex-snapshot

Are We at War? What Do We Want? And Do We Want to Win?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108611794.002openalex-snapshot

The Way We Think about War (Particularly Limited War) Is Broken: Here Is How We Fix It

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108611794.003openalex-snapshot

The Political Objective: Why Nations Fight (Limited) Wars

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108611794.004openalex-snapshot

Constraints: Or Why Wars for Limited Aims are So Difficult

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108611794.005openalex-snapshot

Strategy: How to Think about Fighting for a Limited Political Objective

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108611794.006openalex-snapshot

And You Thought the War Was Hard: Ending the War and Securing the Peace

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108611794.007openalex-snapshot

Conclusion: Is History Rhyming?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108611794.008openalex-snapshot

Notes

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108611794.009openalex-snapshot

Bibliography

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108611794.010openalex-snapshot

Index

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108611794.011openalex-snapshot

Index

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2025.2572643openalex-snapshot

Limited nuclear war and the defense of Taiwan

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2014.889086openalex-snapshot

The conceptual essentials of minimum: explaining Pakistan's rationale of minimum deterrence

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11375/kokusaiseiji1957.5_40openalex-snapshot

限定核戦争は可能-限定戦争論:宇宙兵器と国際政治

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/002200276100500203openalex-snapshot

Nuclear weapons and limited war

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/2009555openalex-snapshot

Experimental Games and Bargaining Theory

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.