On the public citation graph

A Primer of Formal Logic.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2017713

0 signed · 11 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65430-0_33openalex-snapshot

Stanisław Jaśkowski and Natural Deduction Systems

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4983(76)90009-7openalex-snapshot

French industrialization: A reconsideration

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-019650-3.50010-7openalex-snapshot

THE PROPOSITIONAL CALCULUS

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/h0061238openalex-snapshot

Comments on Seeman's operational analysis of the Freudian theory of daydreams.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1954.9712926openalex-snapshot

Modern Logic and Tasks for Experiments on Problem Solving Behavior

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/014453499298165openalex-snapshot

A Brief History of Natural Deduction

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/03634525309376615openalex-snapshot

What are the principles of argument?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1353/frc.1955.0026openalex-snapshot

Bibliography of Fr. Philotheus Boehner, O. F. M.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1353/frc.1958.0009openalex-snapshot

The Theory of Assertoric Consequences in Albert of Saxony

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/2266969openalex-snapshot

On natural deduction

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1960.7.2.229openalex-snapshot

THE LAWS OF THOUGHT?: AN HYPOTHESIS

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.