On the public citation graph

The Role of Trust in Knowledge

https://doi.org/10.2307/2027007
0 signed · 825 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3118291openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3717451openalex-extracted
Mapping the Stony Road toward Trustworthy AI: Expectations, Problems, Conundrums
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4054038openalex-extracted
Knowing For: A New Path in Testimonial Justification
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(200003)37:3<225::aid-tea1>3.0.co;2-gopenalex-snapshot
Portraying Science Accurately in Classrooms: Emphasizing Open-Mindedness Rather Than Relativism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781118661666.ch33openalex-snapshot
Experimental Philosophy of Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781118899151.ch2openalex-snapshot
Epistemic Trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781119420828.ch13openalex-snapshot
Why We Don't Deserve Credit for Everything We Know
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781394238651.ch5openalex-snapshot
AI and the Philosophy of Expertise and Epistemic Authority
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315080.part1openalex-snapshot
Part Introduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee685openalex-snapshot
Professional Ethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee685.pub2openalex-snapshot
Professional Ethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee811openalex-snapshot
Expert Testimony, Ethics of
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee811.pub2openalex-snapshot
Expert Testimony, Ethics of
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23669openalex-snapshot
Dimensions of trust in scholarly communication: Problematizing peer review in the aftermath of John Bohannon's “Sting” in science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/ca.70230openalex-snapshot
Epistemological Anatomy: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Anatomical Knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500157openalex-snapshot
Disclosing Conflicts of Interest to Potential Research Participants: Good for Nothing?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500172openalex-snapshot
The Essential Need for Trust When Transmission Risk Cannot Be Eliminated in HIV‐Remission Trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1354openalex-snapshot
Industry Technicians Embedded in Clinical Teams: Impacts on Medical Knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.70048openalex-snapshot
International Evidence on the Relationship Between Financial Literacy and Corporate Cash Holdings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10314openalex-snapshot
A survey of computable biomedical knowledge repositories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20026openalex-snapshot
Should the sociology of science be rated X?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20133openalex-snapshot
Science students' critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20271openalex-snapshot
Introduction to special issue: Science Studies and Science Education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20432openalex-snapshot
Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21575openalex-snapshot
Reconceptualizing nature‐of‐science education in the age of social media
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21589openalex-snapshot
Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and Whole Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21746openalex-snapshot
Ten competencies for the science misinformation crisis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790206openalex-snapshot
Learning to live with scientific expertise: Toward a theory of intellectual communalism for guiding science teaching
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21974openalex-snapshot
Learning to evaluate sources of science (mis)information on the internet: Assessing students' scientific online reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/tea.70050openalex-snapshot
Negotiating Science‐in‐the‐Wild
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46879-4_13openalex-snapshot
Trust, Institutions, and the Physician-Patient Relationship: Implications for Continuity of Care
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3261-7_8openalex-snapshot
Professional Ethics in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45448-9_21openalex-snapshot
Trustworthiness of Information Sources and Information Pedigrees
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68772-8_39openalex-snapshot
Resolving Emergent Issues in Complex Projects: A Knowledge Management Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14235-4_2openalex-snapshot
The shift from the closed to the open body — ramifications for nursing testimony
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1986-9_25openalex-snapshot
Sociology of Scientific Knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6333-4_1openalex-snapshot
Consensus, Negotiation and Mediation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00482-8_3openalex-snapshot
The Place of Justification in the Fabric of Testimonial Knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03457-3_2openalex-snapshot
Critical Examination of the Role of STEM in Propagating and Maintaining Race and Gender Disparities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28367-4_3openalex-snapshot
In Search of a Workable Auxiliary Condition for Authority Arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32722-4_4openalex-snapshot
A Pragmatic Model of Justification Based on “Material Inference” for Social Epistemology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40742-1_6openalex-snapshot
Political Philosophy and the Primacy of Agency
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40947-0_18openalex-snapshot
Scientific Communities. A History of Theories and Concepts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44018-3_6openalex-snapshot
Epistemic Inequality and the Grounds of Trust in Scientific Experts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44018-3_7openalex-snapshot
On Trust in Mathematics: Some Case Studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46339-7_1openalex-snapshot
Distributed Cognition in Aid of Interdisciplinary Collaborations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47260-3_2openalex-snapshot
From Nature of Science to Social Justice: The Political Power of Epistemic Lessons
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51791-5_38openalex-snapshot
Responding to Crises—Worries About Expertization
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67220-1_7openalex-snapshot
A Pragmatic Model of Justification for Social Epistemology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72945-5_10openalex-snapshot
Trust in Science and Scientists: Implications for (Higher) Education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75775-5_5openalex-snapshot
Trust Is All You Need: From Belief Revision to Information Revision
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87037-9_9openalex-snapshot
Trust, Control, and Responsibility in Research – An Accountability Perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41397-1_2openalex-snapshot
The Trust in Science Revisited: Social-Epistemic Challenges in Democratic and Digital Societies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68058-8_2openalex-snapshot
Heresy and Honor. A Historical Perspective on Trust in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68058-8_6openalex-snapshot
Scientific Experts, Epistemic Wisdom and Justified Trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74062-6_41openalex-snapshot
Rebuilding Government Trust: Harnessing Communication for Change
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75212-4_4openalex-snapshot
Advances and Limitations in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75674-0_6openalex-snapshot
Resource Allocation for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence Projects in African Context
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81006-0_11openalex-snapshot
Creating Authority in South Asian Archaeology: Mortimer Wheeler, Stuart Piggott, and Archaeological Knowledge in India
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-96790-0_1openalex-snapshot
Trust, Testimony and Technology: What Makes It So Hard to Combat Disinformation?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-13540-7_8openalex-snapshot
Specialisation and Interdisciplinarity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-15497-2_1openalex-snapshot
Introduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-15497-2_2openalex-snapshot
Autonomy and Authority of Reason
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-15497-2_3openalex-snapshot
Critique of the Trust in Science Model for Democratic Decision-Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-15723-2_6openalex-snapshot
A General Public’s Perspective: Factors that Constrain Individual Trust in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-21032-6_10openalex-snapshot
Trust and Regulation as Delegated Understanding
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-26797-9_3openalex-snapshot
Together: Trusting Others and Conversation in Dark Times
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-27049-8_13openalex-snapshot
Expert Advice and Institutional Trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08551-7_4openalex-snapshot
Explicating Ways of Consensus-Making in Science and Society: Distinguishing the Academic, the Interface and the Meta-Consensus
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13458-1_2openalex-snapshot
Fiscal Justice and Justified Trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14938-7_10openalex-snapshot
Understanding the Role of Trust in Network-Based Responses to Disaster Management and Climate Change Adaptation in the Asia-Pacific Region
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16148-8_1openalex-snapshot
Appeal to Expert Testimony – A Bayesian Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16543-1_3openalex-snapshot
Connoisseurs of Science: A Next Goal for Science Education?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18600-9_3openalex-snapshot
Feeling with the Organism: A Blueprint for an Empirical Philosophy of Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2_8openalex-snapshot
Trust in Science and the Science of Trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_34openalex-snapshot
Computer Simulations and Computational Models in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58365-5_6openalex-snapshot
Epistemic Interactions Within and Outside Scientific Communities: Different or Analogous Processes?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62864-6_5openalex-snapshot
Group Knowledge in Interrogative Epistemology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89761-5_8openalex-snapshot
The Challenges and Opportunities for Embracing Complex Socio-scientific Issues As Important in Learning Science: The Murray-Darling River Basin As an Example
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94177-6_9openalex-snapshot
How Knowing Changes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99007-1_99openalex-snapshot
Development and Validation of Instrument for Assessing Researcher’s Participation in e-Collaboration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91205-9_7openalex-snapshot
Literatur
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91822-8_5openalex-snapshot
Konturen einer analytischen Literaturtheorie
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04893-7_13openalex-snapshot
Dynamic Testimonial Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39942-9_4openalex-snapshot
Information and Knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65688-4_3openalex-snapshot
Vertrauen in die Wissenschaften – was ist das und welche Grundlage hat es?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66073-7_5openalex-snapshot
Vertrauen in die Wissenschaft – philosophische Erwägungen
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_1042openalex-snapshot
Social Epistemology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_1042-1openalex-snapshot
Social Epistemology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8311-4_21openalex-snapshot
Epistemic Honesty
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-719-6_5openalex-snapshot
Marie Curie, Ethics and Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_709-1openalex-snapshot
Education and Testimonial Knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-6833-8_5openalex-snapshot
Expertise and Epistemic Trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-6271-5_8openalex-snapshot
Evidentiality and Testimonial Knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5681-0_1openalex-snapshot
Introduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8960-7_7openalex-snapshot
Competitive Individualism, Intellectual Independence and Imagining some Alternatives and Consequences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01283-0openalex-snapshot
A neo-aristotelian perspective on the need for artificial moral agents (AMAs)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02566-6openalex-snapshot
Epistemic trust in generative AI for higher education scale (ETGAI-HE scale)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-02892-3openalex-snapshot
The value of vulnerability for trustworthy AI
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-02924-yopenalex-snapshot
Can generative artificial intelligence be considered a cognitive subject? An analytic analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9218-7openalex-snapshot
Expertise, Argumentation, and the End of Inquiry
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09522-2openalex-snapshot
The Legitimacy Crisis of Arguments from Expert Opinion: Can’t We Trust Experts?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-021-09564-0openalex-snapshot
From Theory of Rhetoric to the Practice of Language Use: The Case of Appeals to Ethos Elements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-023-09655-5openalex-snapshot
Accepting Organizational Theories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04612-3openalex-snapshot
Navigating Between the Plots: A Narratological and Ethical Analysis of Business-Related Conspiracy Theories (BrCTs)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-021-09407-2openalex-snapshot
Encoding Collective Knowledge, Instructing Data Reusers: The Collaborative Fixation of a Digital Scientific Data Set
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-9986-7openalex-snapshot
Testimonial Knowledge-How
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-020-00232-5openalex-snapshot
Group Inquiry
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00647-2openalex-snapshot
Testimonial Reliance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-024-00794-8openalex-snapshot
No Trespassing! Abandoning the Novice/Expert Problem
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-025-01033-4openalex-snapshot
Epistemic Virtue, Cognitive Diversity, and the Division of Labor
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-026-01133-9openalex-snapshot
Knowledge About Skepticism: A Response to Doan Q. C. Vu Duc, Quentin Hiernaux and Olivier Sartenaer
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9243-5openalex-snapshot
The entanglement of trust and knowledge on the Web
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-026-09921-1openalex-snapshot
From disclosure to verification: a risk-differentiated framework for the ethical use of AI in academic research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-024-09693-6openalex-snapshot
Demarcation that Makes the Layperson Smart
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-024-00968-8openalex-snapshot
Scientific and philosophical publication: the current state of affairs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-026-01106-2openalex-snapshot
Science Studies, public understanding of science, and the long shadow of teleology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-09960-5openalex-snapshot
Openness and trust in data-intensive science: the case of biocuration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-09978-9openalex-snapshot
Knowledge repositories. In digital knowledge we trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-023-10164-wopenalex-snapshot
The epistemic harms of direct-to-consumer genetic tests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-023-09498-9openalex-snapshot
Vaccine Hesitancy and the Concept of Trust: An Analysis Based on the Israeli COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7798-xopenalex-snapshot
Testimony and the Infant/Child Objection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01657-6openalex-snapshot
What’s wrong with epistemic trespassing?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02137-3openalex-snapshot
When should one be open-minded?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-025-02346-4openalex-snapshot
Scientific values and value-based science reporting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-025-02356-2openalex-snapshot
Do scientific communities understand? A fictionalist account
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-014-9481-2openalex-snapshot
Faith and Trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10247-zopenalex-snapshot
Reconceptualizing Epistemic Dependence for Future Scientific Literacy: A Lesson from the LK-99 Case
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9065-3openalex-snapshot
Gender and physics: feminist philosophy and science education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9469-1openalex-snapshot
The Role of Authority in Science and Religion with Implications for Science Teaching and Learning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9475-3openalex-snapshot
Scientific Communication and the Nature of Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9672-8openalex-snapshot
From Science Studies to Scientific Literacy: A View from the Classroom
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00257-4openalex-snapshot
Who Speaks for Science?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00292-1openalex-snapshot
Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00527-xopenalex-snapshot
Scientific Truth in a Post-Truth Era: A Review*
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05806-8openalex-snapshot
Stated preferences for LLM involvement in peer review among Chinese researchers: evidence from a discrete choice experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9044-xopenalex-snapshot
Why we don’t deserve credit for everything we know
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9786-3openalex-snapshot
Trust, expertise, and the philosophy of science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9789-0openalex-snapshot
Scientific and lay communities: earning epistemic trust through knowledge sharing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0151-6openalex-snapshot
The cognitive attitude of rational trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0172-1openalex-snapshot
Epistemic dependence in interdisciplinary groups
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0283-3openalex-snapshot
Epistemic dependence and collective scientific knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0376-zopenalex-snapshot
Believing on trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0589-9openalex-snapshot
Group knowledge: a real-world approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0760-yopenalex-snapshot
The transmission of knowledge and justification
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1128-7openalex-snapshot
Hearsay viewed through the lens of trust, reputation and coherence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1475-zopenalex-snapshot
Implicit trust in clinical decision-making by multidisciplinary teams
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01908-wopenalex-snapshot
Knowledge from scientific expert testimony without epistemic trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02017-4openalex-snapshot
Scientific deceit
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1778-8openalex-snapshot
Acceptable gaps in mathematical proofs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02388-2openalex-snapshot
Inevitable ignorance as a standard for excusability: an epistemological analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02669-1openalex-snapshot
Objectivity, trust and social responsibility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02734-9openalex-snapshot
The role of testimony in mathematics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02812-yopenalex-snapshot
Epistemology of testimony and values in science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03169-6openalex-snapshot
Virtues for agents in directed social networks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03203-7openalex-snapshot
Should one trust experts?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03342-xopenalex-snapshot
What epistemologists of testimony should learn from philosophers of science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03592-3openalex-snapshot
Trusting scientific experts in an online world
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03877-7openalex-snapshot
Science as a moral system
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03975-6openalex-snapshot
Instruments, agents, and artificial intelligence: novel epistemic categories of reliability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03991-6openalex-snapshot
Debunking creedal beliefs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04080-yopenalex-snapshot
The subject of knowledge in collaborative science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04267-3openalex-snapshot
Social sciences in crisis: on the proposed elimination of the discussion section
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04387-wopenalex-snapshot
How to do things with insecure extensions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04471-1openalex-snapshot
Value transparency and promoting warranted trust in science communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04472-0openalex-snapshot
Earning epistemic trustworthiness: an impact assessment model
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04493-3openalex-snapshot
Objectivity, shared values, and trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04567-2openalex-snapshot
Bridgman and the normative independence of science: an individual physicist in the shadow of the bomb
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04772-zopenalex-snapshot
Taking the public seriously: the role of respect in interactions between scientific experts and lay publics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-04930-xopenalex-snapshot
Of opaque oracles: epistemic dependence on AI in science poses no novel problems for social epistemology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-04955-2openalex-snapshot
Community science and the value-free ideal
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-04963-2openalex-snapshot
The AI-mediated communication dilemma: epistemic trust, social media, and the challenge of generative artificial intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-05212-2openalex-snapshot
The value of epistemic trust in public experts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-05349-0openalex-snapshot
Socially distributed ignorance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-05484-2openalex-snapshot
Expertise, opacity, and trust in AI systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-05633-7openalex-snapshot
Regulating strategic track-record building: institutional remedies for individual expert identification
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-05700-zopenalex-snapshot
Gatekeeping in science reporting: a zetetic account
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-005-5055-3openalex-snapshot
Game Theory in Philosophy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-012-9133-zopenalex-snapshot
The Second Essential Tension: on Tradition and Innovation in Interdisciplinary Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-012-9140-0openalex-snapshot
The Future of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-013-9227-2openalex-snapshot
The Semantics of Untrustworthiness
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9411-2openalex-snapshot
Expertise: A Practical Explication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10116-wopenalex-snapshot
Should we Trust Our Feeds? Social Media, Misinformation, and the Epistemology of Testimony
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10144-6openalex-snapshot
On the Normative Complexity of Covid-19 Vaccine Refusal
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-025-00589-yopenalex-snapshot
Trust and care robots: philosophical considerations, ethical challenges, and viable options
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-026-00957-7openalex-snapshot
The Normative Dimension of Trusting Expert Advice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-026-00979-1openalex-snapshot
The Structure of Epistemic Trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9560-1openalex-snapshot
Scepticism and trust: two counterpoint essentials in science education for complex socio-scientific issues
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9013-xopenalex-snapshot
Moral Rules, Moral Ideals, and Use-Inspired Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9628-2openalex-snapshot
The Acid Test for Biological Science: STAP Cells, Trust, and Replication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0030-8openalex-snapshot
Critiquing the Reasons for Making Artificial Moral Agents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00489-xopenalex-snapshot
Epistemic Trust in Scientific Experts: A Moral Dimension
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-010-9127-3openalex-snapshot
Competence and Trust in Choice Architecture
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-023-09527-0openalex-snapshot
Why Won’t You Listen To Me? Predictive Neurotechnology and Epistemic Authority
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-024-00619-zopenalex-snapshot
Vigilant trust in scientific expertise
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-025-00704-xopenalex-snapshot
Expert trustworthiness and the value-free ideal of science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-025-00707-8openalex-snapshot
Ad hominem arguments in scientific discourses – rational heuristic or dangerous immunisation strategy?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00781-6openalex-snapshot
Is trust in science a good thing?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-013-0128-5openalex-snapshot
Living in an Impossible World: Real-izing the Consequences of Intransitive Trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0331-5openalex-snapshot
Taking Stock of Engineering Epistemology: Multidisciplinary Perspectives
showing the first 200 of 825
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.