On the public citation graph
Plant Taxonomy: The Systematic Evaluation of Comparative Data.
0 signed · 5 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-6197openalex-snapshot
Plant taxonomy: the systematic evaluation of comparative data
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3636.2.1zenodo-depositor-declared
To name or not to name: Criteria to promote economy of change in Linnaean classification schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2020.103214openalex-snapshot
Morphological and anatomical plasticity of a rare amphibious species of Eriocaulaceae (Poales, Monocotyledons)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-34133openalex-snapshot
Comparative Study of the Ploidy Series Bromus sterilis, B. diandrus and B. rigidus (Poaceae) Based on Chromosome Numbers, Morphology and Isozymes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/1223969openalex-snapshot
Botanical systematics 1950‐2000: change, progress, or both?
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.