On the public citation graph
Further dogged defense of paraphyletic taxa
0 signed · 54 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0285-5_49openalex-snapshot
In defence of paraphyletic taxa
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1223771openalex-snapshot
Paraphyletic taxa are inherent in Linnaean classification – a reply to Freudenstein
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16286539openalex-snapshot
WHAT IS THE WRITER OF A FLORA TO DO? EVOLUTIONARY TAXONOMY OR PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5642/aliso.19961502.06openalex-snapshot
Classification: More than Just Branching Patterns of Evolution
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12424zenodo-depositor-declared
Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12364openalex-snapshot
Taxonomic treatment and phylogenetic analysis of the family Potamogetonaceae in Turkey
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/tax.573003openalex-snapshot
Contrasting the general with the particular in phylogenetics—a proposal to keep the meanings of mono/paraphyletic and clade/grade separated
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/tax.574011openalex-snapshot
Evolutionary inferences from non‐monophyly on molecular trees
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/tax.604005openalex-snapshot
Revisiting monophyly in Haworthia Duval (Asphodelaceae): Incongruence, hybridization and contemporary speciation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-016-0467-1openalex-snapshot
Banning paraphylies and executing Linnaean taxonomy is discordant and reduces the evolutionary and semantic information content of biological nomenclature
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-015-1254-6openalex-snapshot
Problems with generic delimitation in the Odontoglossum complex (Orchidaceae, Oncidiinae) and an attempt for a solution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0256-3openalex-snapshot
Descriptive statistics in research and teaching: are we losing the middle ground?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02284-9openalex-snapshot
Whales, fish and Alaskan bears: interest-relative taxonomy and kind pluralism in biology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-009-0636-yopenalex-snapshot
The systematic position of Lasallia caroliniana (Tuck.) Davydov, Peršoh & Rambold comb. nova and considerations on the generic concept of Lasallia (Umbilicariaceae, Ascomycota)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-014-9522-0openalex-snapshot
Richard Kenneth Brummitt (1937 – 2013)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2007.07.003openalex-snapshot
Why is there a lack of Mode 3 Levallois technologies in East Asia? A phylogenetic test of the Movius–Schick hypothesis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2165-c3openalex-snapshot
A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements should reflect their phylogeny
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2165-c4openalex-snapshot
Reply: A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements should reflect their phylogeny
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/sb05011openalex-snapshot
An end to all things? — plants and their names
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/sb09044openalex-snapshot
Phylogeny reconstruction of Callitris Vent. (Cupressaceae) and its allies leads to inclusion of Actinostrobus within Callitris
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/sb15015openalex-snapshot
Paraphyly, modern systematics and the transfer of Dryandra into Banksia (Proteaceae): a response to George
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2019.1646834openalex-snapshot
Does nomenclatural stability justify para/polyphyletic taxa? A phylogenetic classification in the xeric clade Pitcairnioideae (Bromeliaceae)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/42.6.923openalex-snapshot
Classification of Mosquitoes in Tribe Aedini (Diptera: Culicidae): Paraphylyphobia, and Classification Versus Cladistic Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001474openalex-snapshot
Paraphyly and (yeast) classification
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00367.xopenalex-snapshot
Fallacies and false premises—a critical assessment of the arguments for the recognition of paraphyletic taxa in botany
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00421.xopenalex-snapshot
Establishing criteria for higher‐level classification using molecular data: the systematics ofPolyommatusblue butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00184.xopenalex-snapshot
Pieces in the plant puzzle
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12065openalex-snapshot
M ansuyia S un, and T sinania W alcott, from the F urongian of N orth C hina and the evolution of the trilobite family T sinaniidae
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11606/t.41.2008.tde-16092008-181652openalex-snapshot
Filogenética de Pilocarpinae (Rutaceae)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1162/biot_a_00063openalex-snapshot
Structuralism in Phylogenetic Systematics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1179/204234811x13194453002742openalex-snapshot
Is Welsh Poppy,Meconopsis cambrica(L.) Vig. (Papaveraceae), truly aMeconopsis?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s43008-022-00097-zopenalex-snapshot
Phytophthora: an ancient, historic, biologically and structurally cohesive and evolutionarily successful generic concept in need of preservation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12705/664.2openalex-snapshot
A molecular phylogeny of the Sematophyllaceae s.l. (Hypnales) based on plastid, mitochondrial and nuclear markers, and its taxonomic implications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj70.03.289openalex-snapshot
Families and orders of angiosperms of the flora of Ukraine: a pragmatic classification and placement in the phylogenetic system
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj73.01.003openalex-snapshot
Fallacies and false premises: a plea against the dissociation of taxonomy from biology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj73.04.319openalex-snapshot
Macrosystematics of Didymodon sensu lato (Pottiaceae, Bryophyta) using an analytic key and information theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1651/07-2969.1openalex-snapshot
Zuzalpheus Ríos and Duffy, 2007: A Junior Synonym of Synalpheus Bate, 1888 (Decapoda: Alpheidae)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2007)73[67:aucotc]2.0.co;2openalex-snapshot
An Updated Classification of the Class Magnoliopsida (“Angiospermae”)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1666/10-107.1openalex-snapshot
Middle Furongian (late Cambrian) shumardiids from the Sesong Formation, Taebaek Group, Korea
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.36(139).2012.2441openalex-snapshot
FLORÍSTICA Y SISTEMÁTICA FILOGENÉTICA INNECESARIAMENTE DISYUNTAS: EL CASO DE ARISTOLOCHIA, EUGLYPHA Y HOLOSTYLIS (ARISTOLOCHIACEAE)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/25065489openalex-snapshot
Monophyly vs. paraphyly in plant systematics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/25065631openalex-snapshot
Paraphyletic versus monophyletic taxa—evolutionary versus cladistic classifications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/25065847openalex-snapshot
Paraphyly and the species concept, a reply to Ebach & al.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3140/bull.geosci.1465openalex-snapshot
The classification of the Pterobranchia (Cephalodiscida and Graptolithina)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3417/0026-6493(2007)94[690:nesfcr]2.0.co;2openalex-snapshot
NINE EASY STEPS FOR CONSTRUCTING RELIABLE TREES FROM PUBLISHED PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES1
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3417/2012086openalex-snapshot
The Case Against the Transfer ofDryandratoBanksia(Proteaceae)1
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3417/2012089openalex-snapshot
Taxonomy Versus Cladonomy in the Dicot Families1
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5897/ajb2007.000-2063openalex-snapshot
Phylogenetics in plant biotechnology: principles, obstacles and opportunities for the resource poor
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7275/fyvd-rr19openalex-snapshot
Ciliate Biodiversity and Phylogenetic Reconstruction Assessed by Multiple Molecular Markers
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.