On the public citation graph
Rules, reasons, arguments : formal studies of argumentation and defeat
0 signed · 128 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/int.4550060103openalex-snapshot
A theory of defeasible reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60428-6_18openalex-snapshot
Arguments and defeat in argument-based nonmonotonic reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61313-7_97openalex-snapshot
A system for defeasible argumentation, with defeasible priorities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2699-8_9openalex-snapshot
Defeasible Reasoning: A Philosophical Analysis in Prolog
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00118479openalex-snapshot
Isomorphism and legal knowledge based systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00352915openalex-snapshot
Argument and belief: Where we stand in the Keynesian tradition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(80)90014-4openalex-snapshot
A logic for default reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(88)90077-xopenalex-snapshot
A logical framework for default reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(88)90079-3openalex-snapshot
An approach to default reasoning based on a first-order conditional logic: Revised report
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(90)90101-5openalex-snapshot
Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(92)90071-5openalex-snapshot
Conditional entailment: Bridging two approaches to default reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-xopenalex-snapshot
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)90057-4openalex-snapshot
Justification and defeat
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.1994.9965697openalex-snapshot
Three meanings of analogical reasoning in law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.1994.9965701openalex-snapshot
Reason‐based logic: A logic for reasoning with rules and reasons
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.1994.9965702openalex-snapshot
A dialogue game for legal arguments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198537472.003.0002openalex-snapshot
General Patterns in Nonmonotonic Reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/0824-7935.00055openalex-snapshot
Process and Policy: Resource‐Bounded NonDemonstrative Reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1987.tb00178.xopenalex-snapshot
Defeat among arguments: a system of defeasible inference
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1993.tb00309.xopenalex-snapshot
AN ARGUMENT‐BASED APPROACH TO NONMONOTONIC REASONING*
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1994.tb00175.xopenalex-snapshot
A Formal Model of Legal Argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/158976.158977openalex-snapshot
A logical framework for modelling legal argument
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/222092.222098openalex-snapshot
Teleological reasoning in reason-based logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/222092.222099openalex-snapshot
Hart's critics on defeasible concepts and ascriptivism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v16i4.1175openalex-snapshot
The Workshop on Computational Dialectics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1338226openalex-snapshot
Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4307.003.0016openalex-snapshot
An Assumption-based Framework for Non-monotonic Reasoning
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1788951openalex-extracted
A Model of Legal Acts: Part 1: The World of Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2656046openalex-extracted
Logical Tools for Legal Pluralism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1999.0297openalex-snapshot
The law as a dynamic interconnected system of states of affairs: a legal top ontology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45632-5_14openalex-snapshot
The Role of Logic in Computational Models of Legal Argument: A Critical Survey
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_18openalex-snapshot
Argumentation in Legal Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2808-3_26openalex-snapshot
Law, Logic, Rhetoric: A Procedural Model of Legal Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5904-1_7openalex-snapshot
Argumentation Theory and Decision Aiding
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00792-2_9openalex-snapshot
Allowing for Joint Attacks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19575-9_11openalex-snapshot
Formalising Debates About Law-Making Proposals as Practical Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77522-7_2openalex-snapshot
What Is Legal Validity? Lessons from Soft Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_75openalex-snapshot
Cases and Dialectical Arguments – An Approach to Case-Based Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75526-5_4openalex-snapshot
A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00207-6_13openalex-snapshot
A Dialogue Mechanism for Public Argumentation Using Conversation Policies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_13openalex-snapshot
Modelling Argument Accrual in Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04985-9_26openalex-snapshot
Rules and Norms: Requirements for Rule Interchange Languages in the Legal Domain
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0140-3_5openalex-snapshot
A Formal Logical Hybrid Theory of Argumentation and Explanation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9010-5_5openalex-snapshot
Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0456-4_3openalex-snapshot
Logics for Defeasible Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1129-4_1openalex-snapshot
Legal Argumentation and Legal Interpretation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1129-4_2openalex-snapshot
The Logical Approach of Legal Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-006-0069-yopenalex-snapshot
Deliberative discourse and reasoning from generic argument structures
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-010-0147-3openalex-snapshot
Multiple criteria decision aiding: a dialectical perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-010-9154-1openalex-snapshot
A taxonomy of argumentation models used for knowledge representation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-010-9184-zopenalex-snapshot
The foundations of DeLP: defeating relations, games and truth values
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-4418-7openalex-snapshot
AI & Law, Logic and Argument Schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-4421-zopenalex-snapshot
Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9257-0openalex-snapshot
Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-006-9012-2openalex-snapshot
Legitimacy and the Virtualization of Dispute Resolution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-008-9073-5openalex-snapshot
Understanding the law: improving legal knowledge dissemination by translating the contents of formal sources of law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-011-9105-4openalex-snapshot
A model of juridical acts: part 1: the world of law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9314-yopenalex-snapshot
On Degrees of Justification
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-008-9091-5openalex-snapshot
Evaluating Dialectical Structures
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-6198-xopenalex-snapshot
Argumentation Schemes and Enthymemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9276-4openalex-snapshot
Evaluating dialectical structures with Bayesian methods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-006-0005-4openalex-snapshot
Modelling Inference in Argumentation through Labelled Deduction: Formalization and Logical Properties
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2015.06.005openalex-snapshot
Law and logic: A review from an argumentation perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2025.105600openalex-snapshot
Relational model of all genetic codes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.03.006openalex-snapshot
A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.11.025openalex-snapshot
Modelling argument accrual with possibilistic uncertainty in a logic programming setting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2013.08.004openalex-snapshot
A neural cognitive model of argumentation with application to legal inference and decision making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(03)00107-3openalex-snapshot
Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0888-613x(00)00063-3openalex-snapshot
Cost-bounded argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888900002058openalex-snapshot
Argument-based applications to knowledge engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888906000865openalex-snapshot
Formal systems for persuasion dialogue
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888913000325openalex-snapshot
A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068403001674openalex-snapshot
Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008247812801openalex-snapshot
An Integrated View on Rules and Principles
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008311419377openalex-snapshot
Henry Prakken, Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008318016098openalex-snapshot
Henry Prakken (1997). Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008327629468openalex-snapshot
Thomas F. Gordon, The Pleadings Game – An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008348321016openalex-snapshot
Dialectical models in artificial intelligence and law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010374523108openalex-snapshot
Eight Dialectic Benchmarks Discussed By Two Artificial Localist Disputors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013803600690openalex-snapshot
Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press (Book Review)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015023512975openalex-snapshot
Explanation and Argumentation Capabilities:Towards the Creation of More Persuasive Agents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019536206548openalex-snapshot
An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024189714814openalex-snapshot
Negotiation and Defeasible Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/b:arti.0000013333.96215.a9openalex-snapshot
Is there a Burden of Questioning?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/b:arti.0000046007.11806.9aopenalex-snapshot
Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/b:arti.0000046008.49443.36openalex-snapshot
Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/b:arti.0000046010.14101.04openalex-snapshot
Why Non-Monotonic Logic is Inadequate to Represent Balancing Arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/b:arti.0000046011.13621.08openalex-snapshot
Law and Defeasibility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0154660openalex-snapshot
Students’ mathematical argumentation ability based on mathematical material and semiotic approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.08fetopenalex-snapshot
Argumentative patterns with symptomatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2014.888836openalex-snapshot
Rough set-based argumentative approach to support collaborative multicriteria knowledge classification
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1360083042000190652openalex-snapshot
Searching for arguments: applying a knowledge‐based ontology of the legal domain
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19331680802662113openalex-snapshot
Providing Argument Support for E-Participation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/13.3.319openalex-snapshot
DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exi057openalex-snapshot
Value-based Argumentation Frameworks as Neural-symbolic Learning Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgm017openalex-snapshot
Argumentation support software: boxes-and-arrows and beyond
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/iconac.2016.7604902openalex-snapshot
Epicurus: A platform for the visualisation of forensic documents based on a linguistic approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2005.00309.xopenalex-snapshot
An Automated System for Argument Invention in Law Using Argumentation and Heuristic Search Procedures*
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/1047788.1047799openalex-snapshot
Application of a knowledge-based ontology of the legal domain in collaborative workspaces
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/1165485.1165500openalex-snapshot
A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/1568234.1568250openalex-snapshot
Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/1921614.1921615openalex-snapshot
Factual argumentation—a core model for assertions making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/261618.261659openalex-snapshot
Logical tools for legal argument
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/323706.323714openalex-snapshot
Automated argument assistance for lawyers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/323706.323793openalex-snapshot
Generating exception structures for legal information serving
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3322640.3326703openalex-snapshot
Modelling Accrual of Arguments in ASPIC+
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/383535.383549openalex-snapshot
Burden of proof in dialogue games and Dutch civil procedure
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/383535.383551openalex-snapshot
A typology of moves involved in case comparison
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/383535.383565openalex-snapshot
Legal decision making as dialectical theory construction with argumentation schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i03.5697openalex-snapshot
Ranking-Based Semantics for Sets of Attacking Arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i9.28918openalex-snapshot
Redefining ABA+ Semantics via Abstract Set-to-Set Attacks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22329/il.v21i2.2241openalex-snapshot
Abductive, presumptive and plausible arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22329/il.v28i1.511openalex-snapshot
Weighing and Balancing in the Justification of Judicial Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220103.026openalex-snapshot
The Advantage and Impact of CIRC-Typed and Problem-Based Cooperative Learning Models on Students’ Mathematical Argument
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-58603-900-4-543openalex-snapshot
Hybrid Reasoning with Argumentation Schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-455openalex-snapshot
Argumentation and rules with exceptions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.33612/diss.136479932openalex-snapshot
Reasoning with Defeasible Reasons
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1818-3.ch005openalex-snapshot
Communicating Reasoning and Dialectics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1818-3.ch009openalex-snapshot
Tools and Applications for Reasoning Communities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1301.7404openalex-snapshot
Resolving Conflicting Arguments under Uncertainties
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.cs/0405107openalex-snapshot
A Framework for Combining Defeasible Argumentation with Labeled Deduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5555/1402383.1402448openalex-snapshot
A dialogue mechanism for public argumentation using conversation policies
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.