On the public citation graph
Local e-government Benchlearning: Impact analysis and applicability to smart cities benchmarking
0 signed · 60 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.006openalex-snapshot
A Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis of the Performance of Global Cities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.009openalex-snapshot
10year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.011openalex-snapshot
Are determining factors of municipal E-government common to a worldwide municipal view? An intra-country comparison
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.02.003openalex-snapshot
The Contextual Benchmark Method: Benchmarking e-Government services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.006openalex-snapshot
e-Government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.008openalex-snapshot
The e-Government evaluation challenge: A South African Batho Pele-aligned service quality approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.09.006openalex-snapshot
Benchmarking e-Government: A comparison of frameworks for computing e-Government index and ranking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.010openalex-snapshot
Developing and validating a citizen-centric typology for smart city services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.02.001openalex-snapshot
Multicriteria decision support for global e-government evaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0740-624x(01)00066-1openalex-snapshot
Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0740-624x(01)00089-2openalex-snapshot
Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290075039openalex-snapshot
Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2007.11918028openalex-snapshot
Unlocking Public Value: A New Model for Achieving High Performance in Public Service Organizations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126openalex-snapshot
Will the real smart city please stand up?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530810908229openalex-snapshot
A framework for evaluating web sites of public authorities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810904532openalex-snapshot
Citizens' attitudes towards e‐government and e‐governance: a UK study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040710837892openalex-snapshot
Benchmarking the e‐government bulldozer: beyond measuring the tread marks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/eb002939openalex-snapshot
The International Journal of Public Sector Management
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2004.1265308openalex-snapshot
Evolution of local government e-services: the applicability of e-business maturity models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2004.1265315openalex-snapshot
An analysis of a shared services centre in e-government
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2012.615openalex-snapshot
Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1994.tb01507.xopenalex-snapshot
International Review of Administrative Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852307077959openalex-snapshot
The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1386/jots.4.2.157_1openalex-snapshot
E-Government services in local governments a study of development in Swedish municipalities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4978openalex-snapshot
Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate And Individual Governance Indicators 1996-2008
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17705/3sjisopenalex-snapshot
Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264059412-enopenalex-snapshot
Rethinking e-Government Services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2011-enopenalex-snapshot
Government at a Glance 2011
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.18356/6940055c-enopenalex-snapshot
Leveraging e-government at a time of financial and economic crisis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1148386openalex-snapshot
Governance Matters VII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996-2007
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2200/s00261ed1v01y201003hci008openalex-snapshot
Experience Design: Technology for All the Right Reasons
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.29173/cais517openalex-snapshot
Joined-up E-Government: An Exploratory Study of UK Local Government Progress
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2011.may.02openalex-snapshot
Benchmarking Del e-Gobierno Local: Limitaciones de Los Métodos de Evaluación Comparativa
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-2004-0055openalex-snapshot
Evaluating the progress of e-government development: A critical analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4018/ijegropenalex-snapshot
International Journal of Electronic Government Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4018/ijegr.2014100103openalex-snapshot
Benchmarking Municipal E-Government Services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2014.5306openalex-snapshot
E-GOVERNMENT MATURITY MODELS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.v4i12.2483openalex-snapshot
Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of the cities?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5821/ctv.7571openalex-snapshot
Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of cities?
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4777751openalex-extracted
CITIZENS’ PARTICIPATION IN INDONESIA’S COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63396-7_16openalex-snapshot
Why are Rankings of ‘Smart Cities’ Lacking? An Analysis of Two Decades of e-Government Benchmarking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81425-9_4openalex-snapshot
From Development to Deployment of a Digital Assessment Software in Public Administration: Insights from Slovenia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89474-4_6openalex-snapshot
Towards a Working Model of e-Participation in Smart Cities: What the Research Suggests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.12.021openalex-snapshot
Quality and the efficiency of data in “Smart-Cities”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.001openalex-snapshot
RETRACTED: The role of single valued neutrosophic sets and rough sets in smart city: Imperfect and incomplete information systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2020.1808814openalex-snapshot
Benchmarking digital education programs on social entrepreneurship: what a digital program on social entrepreneurship can learn from other digital social entrepreneurship programs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-07-2020-0192openalex-snapshot
Modelling and analysis of factors for implementation of smart cities: TISM approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/tg-06-2025-0182openalex-snapshot
Learning by assessing digital government: a case study of the digital index framework
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2022-0-5-152-181openalex-snapshot
EVALUATING DIGITAL GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE USING SURVEYS: INTERNATIONAL LITERATURE REVIEW AND PROSPECTS FOR THE FUTURE RESEARCH
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.25944/znmwse.2018.04.95114openalex-snapshot
Local e-government models: A comparative and critical overview
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/ip-160399openalex-snapshot
An empirical study of the role of e-government benchmarking in China
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/ip-190131openalex-snapshot
What is the point of benchmarking e-government? An integrative and critical literature review on the phenomenon of benchmarking e-government
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/math9212668openalex-snapshot
An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Approach for Smart City Development Evaluation for Developing Countries: Moroccan Context
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/su132011438openalex-snapshot
The Right to Have Digital Rights in Smart Cities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/su15021383openalex-snapshot
Conceptualizing and Validating a Model for Benchlearning Capability: Results from the Greek Public Sector
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.53106/160792642023012401016openalex-snapshot
Challenges facing E-government implementation and adoption in the Era of 5G, 6G
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.