On the public citation graph
Optimal Accuracy of Unbiased Tullock Contests with Two Heterogeneous Players
0 signed · 14 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12618openalex-snapshot
Heterogeneity, leveling the playing field, and affirmative action in contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.05.012openalex-snapshot
Revenue ranking of optimally biased contests: The case of two players
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2003.11.003openalex-snapshot
Maximum efforts in contests with asymmetric valuations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.11.005openalex-snapshot
Rent seeking and rent dissipation: A neutrality result
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840701349182openalex-snapshot
Rule changes and competitive balance in Formula One motor racing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12003openalex-snapshot
Lotteries vs. All‐Pay Auctions in Fair and Biased Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3655727openalex-snapshot
Heterogeneity, Leveling the Playing Field, and Affirmative Action in Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1704.1613openalex-snapshot
The Optimal Accuracy Level in Asymmetric Contests
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5046234openalex-extracted
Party Politics: A Contest Perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112285openalex-snapshot
Competitive outcomes in a Cournot-Tullock contest
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112572openalex-snapshot
Contests with endogenous claims: Conflict dissipation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2023.105616openalex-snapshot
Optimal contest design: Tuning the heat
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/g14020027openalex-snapshot
Advances in the Theory and Applications of Contests and Tournaments: Introduction to the Special Issue
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.