On the public citation graph
Understanding Perceptions of the Bioeconomy in Austria—An Explorative Case Study
0 signed · 98 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.27openalex-snapshot
Consumer attitudes toward genetic modification and sustainability: implications for the future of biorenewables
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20157openalex-snapshot
The effect of knowledge types on consumer‐perceived risk and adoption of genetically modified foods
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00024-vopenalex-snapshot
Improving the graphic representation of means-end results
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.03.010openalex-snapshot
Consumers' perceptions regarding tradeoffs between food and fuel expenditures: A case study of U.S. and Belgian fuel users
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.12.025openalex-snapshot
Household energy requirement and value patterns
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.03.006openalex-snapshot
The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and facts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.011openalex-snapshot
Orchestration in political processes: Involvement of experts, citizens, and participatory professionals in forest policy making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.10.035openalex-snapshot
Unraveling Dutch citizens’ perceptions on the bio-based economy: The case of bioplastics, bio-jetfuels and small-scale bio-refineries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.005openalex-snapshot
Ethically minded consumer behavior: Scale review, development, and validation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.060openalex-snapshot
Issues of social acceptance on biofuel development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.157openalex-snapshot
Sustainable development – A ‘selling point’ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.132openalex-snapshot
The responsive bioeconomy: The need for inclusion of citizens and environmental capability in the forest based bioeconomy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.260openalex-snapshot
Transition in the Finnish forest-based sector: Company perspectives on the bioeconomy, circular economy and sustainability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.05.010openalex-snapshot
Destination bioeconomy – The path towards a smarter, more sustainable future
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2016.03.007openalex-snapshot
Consumer perception of bio-based products—An exploratory study in 5 European countries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.01.010openalex-snapshot
Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.08.005openalex-snapshot
Forest management or greed of gain?—An information experiment on peri-urban forest visitors’ attitudes regarding harvesting operations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025319915498openalex-snapshot
Production, Consumption and the World Summit on Sustainable Development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2017.1315833openalex-snapshot
Forests in a bioeconomy: bridge, boundary or divide?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/208643openalex-snapshot
Some Internal Psychological Factors Influencing Consumer Choice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2012.1508openalex-snapshot
Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700210448917openalex-snapshot
Consumer value structures towards supermarket versus farm shop purchase of apples from integrated production in Belgium
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1505/146554817822407420openalex-snapshot
Environmental concerns in political bioeconomy discourses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.5.018openalex-snapshot
The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.103981openalex-snapshot
The Increasing Multifunctionality of Agricultural Raw Materials: Three Dilemmas for Innovation and Adoption
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2478/boku-2018-0005openalex-snapshot
What would potential future opinion leaders like to know? An explorative study on the perceptions of four wood-based innovations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/f9050255openalex-snapshot
Perceptions on the Importance of Forest Sector Innovations: Biofuels, Biomaterials, or Niche Products?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062589openalex-snapshot
The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062751openalex-snapshot
Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An Analysis of Official National Approaches
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810461openalex-snapshot
Towards a Bioeconomy in Europe: National, Regional and Industrial Strategies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070691openalex-snapshot
What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030341openalex-snapshot
Visions and Expectations for the Norwegian Bioeconomy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040669openalex-snapshot
A Transition to Which Bioeconomy? An Exploration of Diverging Techno-Political Choices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061031openalex-snapshot
Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600844-9openalex-snapshot
Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v8n4p87openalex-snapshot
An Extended Model of Behavioural Process in Consumer Decision Making
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4676338openalex-extracted
In the Myopic Realm, Supply Limiters Overshadow Demand Limiters: A Review of the Bioeconomy's Growth Limiters
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87402-5_10openalex-snapshot
The Bioeconomy Transformation in the German Rheinische Revier: Stakeholders and Discourses in Media Coverage
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29294-1_8openalex-snapshot
Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment for Sustainable Bioeconomy, Societal-Ecological Transformation and Beyond
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54700-3_8openalex-snapshot
Transformation Towards a Sustainable Regional Bioeconomy—A Monitoring Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29433-5_4openalex-snapshot
Wissen für den Wandel – Wissenstheoretische Grundlagen einer nachhaltigen Bioökonomiepolitik
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67864-0_8openalex-snapshot
Kapitel 6. Landnutzungsentscheidungen: Klimawandelrelevante Strategien, Steuerungsinstrumente und Managementansätze
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-03060-1openalex-snapshot
The circular bioeconomy: pathways to sustainability and resource optimization
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03403-wopenalex-snapshot
Socio-cultural conditions for social acceptance of bioeconomy transitions: the case of Norway
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-021-09861-4openalex-snapshot
Time to Say ‘Good Buy’ to the Passive Consumer? A Conceptual Review of the Consumer in the Bioeconomy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01376-yopenalex-snapshot
Bioeconomy perception by future stakeholders: Hearing from European forestry students
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01401-0openalex-snapshot
Social dimensions of a forest-based bioeconomy: A summary and synthesis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02297-4openalex-snapshot
Pathways to bioeconomy development: A multi-regional perspective from Europe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00229-yopenalex-snapshot
Why is Communicating the Circular Bioeconomy so Challenging?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-90569-5.00002-0openalex-snapshot
Education and training in agriculture and the Bioeconomy: Learning from each other
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2023.100042openalex-snapshot
Identifying primary producers' positioning in the Irish bioeconomy using Social Network Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2024.100087openalex-snapshot
Stated purchase of bio-based products: Personal and regional factors in Germany
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2024.100264openalex-snapshot
Shaping the bioeconomy: Public and private sector perceptions across European regions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101970openalex-snapshot
Depicting the peril and not the potential of forests for a biobased economy? A qualitative content analysis on online news media coverage in German language articles
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103190openalex-snapshot
Bioeconomy in countries of the Mekong region: Stakeholder understanding and perceptions in Thailand, Vietnam, and Laos
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.007openalex-snapshot
Shaping the concept of bioeconomy in participatory projects – An example from the post-graduate education in Finland
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129774openalex-snapshot
The circular economy and bioeconomy in the fashion sector: Emergence of a “sustainability bias”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126748openalex-snapshot
The role of social innovation in the bioeconomy: The case of Costa Rica's pineapple value web
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.006openalex-snapshot
The multitudes of bioeconomies: A systematic review of stakeholders’ bioeconomy perceptions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.009openalex-snapshot
Investigating citizens’ perceptions of the bioeconomy in Germany – High support but little understanding
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.02.010openalex-snapshot
German citizens’ perception of the transition towards a sustainable bioeconomy: A glimpse into the Rheinische Revier
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108765015.011openalex-snapshot
SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure – Anticipating the Potential Impacts on Forests and Forest-Based Livelihoods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2025.2563678openalex-snapshot
Tailoring collaborations with stakeholders for open circular innovation ecosystems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1889632openalex-snapshot
Framing the Circular Bioeconomy in Ireland’s Broadsheet Media, 2004–2019
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2026.2615507openalex-snapshot
The entrepreneurial region? Evolving regional government roles in bioeconomy governance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-01-2023-0002openalex-snapshot
Perception and awareness of the bioeconomy: an empirical study of chosen European academia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/whatt-01-2023-0011openalex-snapshot
Next generation employability and career sustainability in the hospitality industry 5.0
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14361/9783839459836openalex-snapshot
Zukünfte nachhaltiger Bioökonomie
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14361/9783839459836-014openalex-snapshot
Szenarien für die dialogorientierte Kommunikation von und über nachhaltige Bioökonomie mit Jugendlichen
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783839459836openalex-snapshot
Zukünfte nachhaltiger Bioökonomie
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2021.31openalex-snapshot
Personal Experiences of Bioeconomy Development: Autoethography Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17221/21/2021-agriceconopenalex-snapshot
Case studies research in the bioeconomy: A systematic literature review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2478/forj-2021-0025openalex-snapshot
Bioeconomy perception by students of different study programs – study from Slovakia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2478/forj-2026-0006openalex-snapshot
Bioeconomy future: Green transition in Europe from the perspective of life-science students
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2478/vjbsd-2023-0007openalex-snapshot
Grappling with Bioeconomy Research and Discourse in Nigeria – Mixed Method to the Rescue
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24818/ea/2019/50/138openalex-snapshot
German Students Perception of Bioeconomy An Exploratory Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24818/ea/2019/50/9openalex-snapshot
Transition to Bioeconomy: Perceptions and Behaviors in Central and Eastern Europe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-57-109openalex-snapshot
ОБҐРУНТУВАННЯ МЕТОДОЛОГІЇ ЯКІСНОЇ ОЦІНКИ КОРПОРАТИВНОГО СПРИЙНЯТТЯ БІОЕКОНОМІЧНОЇ ТРАНСФОРМАЦІЇ НА УПРАВЛІНСЬКОМУ РІВНІ
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2023-12-336-345openalex-snapshot
A Scientific and Methodological Substantiation of the Conceptual Model for Studying the Factors of Perception of Bioeconomic Transformation in Management
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/app11115307openalex-snapshot
Can Sustainable Packaging Help to Reduce Food Waste? A Status Quo Focusing Plant-Derived Polymers and Additives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/land12010234openalex-snapshot
Bioeconomy—A Systematic Literature Review on Spatial Aspects and a Call for a New Research Agenda
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/land12040809openalex-snapshot
What Makes Farmers Aware in Adopting Circular Bioeconomy Practices? Evidence from a Greek Rural Region
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/land14081533openalex-snapshot
Spatial Variations in Perceptions of Decarbonization Impacts and Public Acceptance of the Bioeconomy in Western Macedonia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/su11113005openalex-snapshot
A Path Transition Towards a Bioeconomy—The Crucial Role of Sustainability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/su11247247openalex-snapshot
Policy Coherence and the Transition to a Bioeconomy: The Case of Ireland
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/su12051877openalex-snapshot
Bioeconomy—Spatial Requirements for Sustainable Development
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/su12083179openalex-snapshot
Constructing the Public in Roadmapping the Transition to a Bioeconomy: A Case Study from the Netherlands
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/su12197987openalex-snapshot
Potential Pathways to the German Bioeconomy: A Media Discourse Analysis of Public Perceptions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/su141912098openalex-snapshot
An Analysis of Irish Dairy Farmers’ Participation in the Bioeconomy: Exploring Power and Knowledge Dynamics in a Multi-actor EIP-AGRI Operational Group
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/su15107883openalex-snapshot
Bioeconomy in Romania: Investigating Farmers’ Knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.36333/k2a03openalex-snapshot
Public perceptions of forestry and the forest-based bioeconomy in the European Union
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781003453529-3openalex-snapshot
Institutional environment of the bioeconomy from a theoretical perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewglce32021338openalex-snapshot
Predicting Acceptance of Biobased Products Based on Subjective Knowledge, Environmental Attitude, Perceived Usefulness, and Socio-demographic Characteristics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/5772eba3z4ea6z4544z9418z3c099ed09c53openalex-snapshot
The transition to a bio-based economy -Toward an integrated understanding
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7896/j.2289openalex-snapshot
Developing BioMAT: A new conceptual framework to model the market of bio-based materials in the EU
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.