On the public citation graph
The use of innovative contracts to provide agri-environmental public goods: Comparing attitudes between Ireland and other European countries
0 signed · 41 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9959-6openalex-snapshot
Studies on Agri-environmental Measures: A Survey of the Literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.12.012openalex-snapshot
A Swiss agri-environment scheme effectively enhances species richness for some taxa over time
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.03.005openalex-snapshot
Quantifying the impact of land-use change to European farmland bird populations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.04.006openalex-snapshot
Environmental-friendly farming in Switzerland is not hornwort-friendly
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.10.009openalex-snapshot
Agri-environmental collaboratives for landscape management in Europe
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101430openalex-snapshot
Insights into innovative contract design to improve the integration of biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural management
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110243openalex-snapshot
Participation in agri-environmental schemes: A contingent valuation study of farmers in Ireland
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112826openalex-snapshot
More than two decades of Agri-Environment schemes: Has the profile of participating farms changed?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.12.014openalex-snapshot
Attachment to land and its downfalls: Can policy encourage land mobility?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.05.002openalex-snapshot
Result-oriented agri-environmental schemes in Europe and their potential for promoting behavioural change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.02.015openalex-snapshot
An investigation into the type of farmer who chose to participate in Rural Environment Protection Scheme (REPS) and the role of institutional change in influencing scheme effectiveness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.009openalex-snapshot
The design of agri-environmental schemes: Farmers’ preferences in southern Spain
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104862openalex-snapshot
Do differential payments for agri-environment schemes affect the environmental benefits? A case study in the North-Eastern Italy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104947openalex-snapshot
Farmers’ perception of co-ordinating institutions in agri-environmental measures – The example of peatland management for the provision of public goods on a landscape scale
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106553openalex-snapshot
The impact of long-term land leases on farm investment: Evidence from the Irish dairy sector
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106706openalex-snapshot
The prospects of innovative agri-environmental contracts in the European policy context: Results from a Delphi study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0264-8377(00)00021-1openalex-snapshot
Promoting farmer uptake of agri-environment schemes: the Countryside Stewardship Arable Options Scheme
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513openalex-snapshot
When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2183111openalex-snapshot
Exploring farmers’ perspectives on collective action: a case study on co-operation in Dutch agri-environment schemes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224x.2018.1432494openalex-snapshot
Are all young farmers the same? An exploratory analysis of on-farm innovation on dairy and drystock farms in the Republic of Ireland
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1979098openalex-snapshot
Motivations of farmers to participate in collective agri-environmental schemes: the case of Dutch agricultural collectives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz019openalex-snapshot
Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policy-oriented review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692x.12187openalex-snapshot
Agri‐Environment Scheme Design: Past Lessons and Future Suggestions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692x.12352openalex-snapshot
Implementation of Eco‐schemes in Fifteen European Union Member States
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12666openalex-snapshot
EU milk quota abolition, dairy expansion, and greenhouse gas emissions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12169openalex-snapshot
Unraveling determinants of inferred and stated attribute nonattendance: Effects on farmers’ willingness to accept to join agri‐environmental schemes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12536openalex-snapshot
The role of agri‐environment schemes in conservation and environmental management
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12383openalex-snapshot
Incorporating Land Tenure Security into Conservation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00452.xopenalex-snapshot
Exploring Farmers' Cultural Resistance to Voluntary Agri‐environmental Schemes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2009.00210.xopenalex-snapshot
Modelling Farmers’ Participation in an Agri‐environmental Scheme using Panel Data: An Application to the Rural Environment Protection Scheme in Ireland
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00240.xopenalex-snapshot
Adverse Selection in the Environmental Stewardship Scheme: Does the Higher Level Stewardship Scheme Design Reduce Adverse Selection?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126936openalex-snapshot
Innovative Contract Solutions for the Provision of Agri-Environmental Climatic Public Goods: A Literature Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-14016openalex-snapshot
Innovative contract solutions for the AECPGs provision: Which features meet the farmers’ approval? Insights from Emilia-Romagna (Italy)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-9678openalex-snapshot
A systematic review of attributes used in choice experiments for agri-environmental contracts
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4658563openalex-extracted
Are Innovative Agri-Environmental Contracts Economically Beneficial? Perspectives from Ireland and the Netherlands
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02027-8openalex-snapshot
Factors Influencing the Perceived Economic Benefits of Innovative Agri-Environmental Contracts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104480openalex-snapshot
Dutch farmers' views on public and private incentives for soil health improvements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103804openalex-snapshot
Factors influencing farmer participation in bottom-up collaborative agri-environment-climate measures
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2025.2524258openalex-snapshot
Assessing contract solutions for agricultural public goods in the Netherlands
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-026-00506-6openalex-snapshot
Understanding motivations for agroforestry maintenance and adoption: a comparative analysis in Europe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.36253/bae-15862openalex-snapshot
New pathways for improved delivery of public goods from agriculture and forestry
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.