On the public citation graph

Citizens United and the Illusion of Coherence

https://doi.org/10.36644/mlr.109.4.citizens
0 signed · 17 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1089/153312904322907676openalex-snapshot
McConnell v. FEC : Not Senator Buckley's First Amendment

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1723663openalex-extracted
Corporate Powers and Political Speech - Implications for Korea of Recent US Supreme Court Decisions (Korean)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3034705openalex-extracted
The Missing Account of Progressive Corporate Criminal Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3797804openalex-extracted
Campaign Speech and the Universal Dilemma in the Common Law of Elections: A Lesson from the Anglo-American Divide
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-23580-0_1openalex-snapshot
The Return of the Robber Barons: The Creation of Super PACs and the Outsized Influence of Corporate Donors Today
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2025.10openalex-snapshot
Electoral costs of political retaliation: bipartisan rejection of attacks on corporate speech
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0738248018000160openalex-snapshot
Corporate Democracy: How Corporations Justified Their Right to Speak in 1970s Boston
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x14000345openalex-snapshot
The influence of lobbying on climate policies; or, why the world might fail
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjx028openalex-snapshot
State Responses to U.S. Supreme Court Campaign Finance Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12708openalex-snapshot
Citizens United , citizens divided:
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1714.2012.01138.xopenalex-snapshot
The Supreme Court as Prometheus: Breathing Life into the Corporate Supercitizen
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12011openalex-snapshot
Law and Public Policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11606/t.2.2020.tde-23032021-002848openalex-snapshot
Autocontenção judicial e jurisdição constitucional
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/009885881303900206openalex-snapshot
The First Amendment and Public Health, at Odds
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15367/kf.v1i2.35openalex-snapshot
United States, Inc.: Citizens United and the Shareholder Citizen
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2202/2152-2820.1057openalex-snapshot
Nonsense and Worries in Citizens United and Its Aftermath
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3982/ecta22979openalex-snapshot
The Equilibrium Effects of Campaign Finance Deregulation on U.S. Elections
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.