On the public citation graph

An empirical basis for the statement that measurement scale properties (and meaning) are irrelevant in statistical analyses

0 signed · 21 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(84)90094-1openalex-snapshot
Restrictions on statistics imposed by method of measurement: Some reality, much mythology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.87.3.564openalex-snapshot
Measurement scales and statistics: Resurgence of an old misconception.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.96.2.394openalex-snapshot
Measurement scales and statistics: The misconception misconceived.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042576openalex-snapshot
Scales and statistics: Parametric and nonparametric.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043043openalex-snapshot
Scale classification and statistics.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057991openalex-snapshot
Additive scales and statistics.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063675openalex-snapshot
On the Statistical Treatment of Football Numbers.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076714openalex-snapshot
Microcounseling versus human relations training: Relative effectiveness with undergraduate trainees.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079858openalex-snapshot
Some issues in the measurement-statistics controversy.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.103.2684.677openalex-snapshot
On the Theory of Scales of Measurement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1412635openalex-snapshot
The Psychological Bulletin

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3787-0_2openalex-snapshot
Assessment Measures and Clinical Scales
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf01097155openalex-snapshot
Scales of measurements: An introduction and a selected bibliography
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2004.01.004openalex-snapshot
Measurement of mobility following stroke: a comparison of the Modified Rivermead Mobility Index and the Motor Assessment Scale
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9406(05)65448-xopenalex-snapshot
Four Outcome Measures for Patellofemoral Joint Problems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9406(05)65449-1openalex-snapshot
Four Outcome Measures for Patellofemoral Joint Problems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00359-xopenalex-snapshot
Dead reckoning (path integration) requires the hippocampal formation: evidence from spontaneous exploration and spatial learning tasks in light (allothetic) and dark (idiothetic) tests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1191/1352458504ms983oaopenalex-snapshot
Outcome measures for multiple sclerosis clinical trials: relative measurement precision of the Expanded Disability Status Scale and Multiple Sclerosis Functional C omposite
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1348/000711007x243582openalex-snapshot
The psychometricians' fallacy: Too clever by half?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3758/bf03337683openalex-snapshot
The measurement-statistics controversy: Factor analysis and subinterval data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.175.7.4761openalex-snapshot
Suppression of Ongoing Disease in a Nonhuman Primate Model of Multiple Sclerosis by a Human-Anti-Human IL-12p40 Antibody
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.