On the public citation graph
Science-based Stakeholder Dialogue for Environmental Policy Implementation
0 signed · 40 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1636openalex-snapshot
Sustainable bioproducts in Brazil: disputes and agreements on a common ground agenda for agriculture and nature protection
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1832openalex-snapshot
Knowledge coproduction in environmental impact assessment: Lessons from the mining industry in Panama
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-008-0047-7openalex-snapshot
A stakeholder dialogue on European vulnerability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9812-xopenalex-snapshot
How wide is the “knowing-doing” gap in invasion biology?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1316-xopenalex-snapshot
Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001openalex-snapshot
How science makes environmental controversies worse
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.001openalex-snapshot
Stakeholder involvement in sustainability science—A critical view
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.12.002openalex-snapshot
Science-based stakeholder dialogues: Theories and tools
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2016.03.003openalex-snapshot
A critical analysis of the Native Vegetation Protection Law of Brazil (2012): updates and ongoing initiatives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1574-101x(08)00605-4openalex-snapshot
Chapter Five Uncertainty in Environmental Decision Making: Issues, Challenges and Future Directions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01300openalex-snapshot
Effects of Governance on Availability of Land for Agriculture and Conservation in Brazil
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016300523441openalex-snapshot
Editorial Introduction: The Practice of Co-operative Inquiry
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/530148aopenalex-snapshot
Does it take too long to publish research?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0855-9openalex-snapshot
The systematic dismantling of Brazilian environmental laws risks losses on all fronts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0191-0openalex-snapshot
To co-produce or not to co-produce
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0194-xopenalex-snapshot
Policy design for the Anthropocene
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015002303.xopenalex-snapshot
Crisis in a Crisis Discipline
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz088openalex-snapshot
World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs121openalex-snapshot
The role of funding agencies in creating interdisciplinary knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/sl-02-2017-0013openalex-snapshot
Stretch collaboration: how to work with people you don’t agree with or like or trust
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12294openalex-snapshot
PRACTITIONER'S PERSPECTIVE: How can ecologists make conservation policy more evidence based? Ideas and examples from a devolved perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12353openalex-snapshot
How to make (in)effective conservation projects: look at the internal context!
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00557.xopenalex-snapshot
Bridging the Gap: How Can Information Access and Exchange Between Conservation Biologists and Field Practitioners be Improved for Better Conservation Outcomes?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.363.6425.330openalex-snapshot
Bolsonaro's first moves have Brazilian scientists worried
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547001022004003openalex-snapshot
Climbing the Ladder of Research Utilization
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-28openalex-snapshot
How research funding agencies support science integration into policy and practice: An international overview
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008120openalex-snapshot
Developing a Framework for Transferring Knowledge Into Action: A Thematic Analysis of the Literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1590/1234-56781806-9479005302003openalex-snapshot
Impactos Econômicos do Código Florestal Brasileiro: uma discussão à luz de um modelo computável de equilíbrio geral
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2018-0658openalex-snapshot
Unfolding additional massive cutback effects of the Native Vegetation Protection Law on Legal Reserves, Brazil
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-40422005000700018openalex-snapshot
O Quadrante de Ruetsap e a anti-ciência, tecnologia e inovação
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.186335openalex-snapshot
Re-mapping integrative conservation: (Dis) coordinate participation in a biosphere reserve in Mexico
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_17_35openalex-snapshot
The Politics of Environmental Knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4322/natcon.00801017openalex-snapshot
O Código Florestal Tem Base Científica?
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4758760openalex-extracted
A New Methodological Framework to Assess Ecological Equivalence in Compensation Schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2025.743165openalex-snapshot
Biodiversity integration drives sustainable and restorative aquaculture
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2026.101390openalex-snapshot
Design principles of dialogue about science and technology and the design frictions they reveal: Towards a demo-technical analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100595openalex-snapshot
A new methodological framework to assess ecological equivalence in compensation schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-026-03124-1openalex-snapshot
A Brazilian approach to training stakeholder engagement skills in biotechnology undergraduates through curricular innovation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2022-1373openalex-snapshot
Science and environmental policy establishment: the case of the Forest Act in the State of São Paulo, Brazil
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.