On the public citation graph

Evaluation of Low Trace DNA Recovery Techniques from Ridged Surfaces

0 signed · 18 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.07.003openalex-snapshot
Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2007.10.071openalex-snapshot
DNA profiling success and relevance of 1739 contact stains from caseworks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2009.08.098openalex-snapshot
Trace DNA collection—Performance of minitape and three different swabs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2006.12.003openalex-snapshot
Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(02)00092-0openalex-snapshot
Archived or directly swabbed latent fingerprints as a DNA source for STR typing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01416.xopenalex-snapshot
The Use of Adhesive Tape for Recovery of DNA from Crime Scene Items

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8385523openalex-extracted
Low Template DNA: Tad, Touch and Traces
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9780470061589.fsa526.pub2openalex-snapshot
Transfer: DNA
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03351-8openalex-snapshot
How to best assess shedder status: a comparison of popular shedder tests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-020-00329-xopenalex-snapshot
Evaluation of the efficiency of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabs for recovery of DNA from metal surfaces
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-021-00423-8openalex-snapshot
Comparison of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabbing systems for touch DNA recovery from metal surfaces
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.03.016openalex-snapshot
Trace DNA evidence dynamics: An investigation into the deposition and persistence of directly- and indirectly-transferred DNA on regularly-used knives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.01.012openalex-snapshot
On DNA transfer: The lack and difficulty of systematic research and how to do it better
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2020.01.002openalex-snapshot
Forensic touch DNA recovery from metal surfaces – A review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2025.101309openalex-snapshot
A simple protocol to improve touch DNA analysis using direct STR amplification
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14733openalex-snapshot
Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin‐to‐skin contact in mock assault scenarios—A comparison of nine collection methods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-025-00444-2openalex-snapshot
Evaluation of swab materials in forensic DNA testing: a systematic review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24126/jobrc.2017.11.1.492openalex-snapshot
الحمض النووي التلامسي (دراسة)
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.