On the public citation graph
The Positive and the Normative in Economic Thought
0 signed · 21 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2025.6openalex-snapshot
A Defence of Informed Preference Satisfaction Theories of Welfare
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2023.2258363openalex-snapshot
Geoff Harcourt and the Central Role of Values in Economics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1350178x.2026.2707952openalex-snapshot
Value judgments and economic expertise: revisiting the division of labor model
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvad022openalex-snapshot
Stated preference methods and STI policy studies: a foreground approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.16995/rhetm.17321openalex-snapshot
On the (non) History of Preference Purification in Modern Economics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459openalex-snapshot
Equitable Evaluation: Voices from the Global South
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459.01openalex-snapshot
Inequality through the evaluation lens
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459.02openalex-snapshot
Holding space for social justice and equity: The relational work of evaluators implementing a Made in Africa Evaluation approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459.03openalex-snapshot
Programme evaluation as a reflection and perpetuator of inequality in the global political economy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459.04openalex-snapshot
‘Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?’ Un(masking) inequality by international institutions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459.05openalex-snapshot
Unlocking climate change adaptation injustice through using intersectional analysis as an evaluation approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459.06openalex-snapshot
‘Whose agenda is it?’ Reframing equity and justice in the evaluation of climate-smart agriculture
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459.07openalex-snapshot
Rethinking how gender inequality is framed in GBV prevention interventions: Learnings from a South African evaluation of interventions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459.08openalex-snapshot
The role of evaluation practice in promoting the prioritisation of mental health equity on the public health agenda in Africa
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459.09openalex-snapshot
Mechanisms and strategies perpetuating evaluative inequalities in policy practice in Zimbabwe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459.10openalex-snapshot
Why emphasis on randomised controlled trials is a flawed approach to evaluation for a more equitable society
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459.11openalex-snapshot
Transformative Equity: Promoting systemic change through a new evaluation criterion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459.12openalex-snapshot
Evaluation in service of equity? A synthesis of the conceptualisation of inequality and evaluation approaches to address inequality
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.