On the public citation graph

Political Candidate Selection

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315175805
0 signed · 13 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3771526openalex-extracted
Can Interest Groups Influence Elections? Evidence from Unions in Great Britain 1900-2019
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x22000617openalex-snapshot
Explaining Public Support for Gender Quotas: Sexism, Representational Quality, and State Intervention in Japan
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s175577392400002xopenalex-snapshot
Ethnic minority MPs as reputational shields? How Western European political parties respond to public opinion shifts on immigration policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2045191openalex-snapshot
Disability policy and UK political parties: absent, present or absent-present citizens?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2025.2469231openalex-snapshot
Disability and candidate recruitment in congressional elections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12726openalex-snapshot
Selecting and ranking female candidates under PR: Evidence from a two‐stage conjoint experiment with party elites
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12924openalex-snapshot
Can interest groups influence elections? Evidence from unions in Great Britain, 1900–2019
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12667openalex-snapshot
Sex, gender, and promotion in executive office: Cabinet careers in the world of Westminster
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120947458openalex-snapshot
Disability and political representation: Analysing the obstacles to elected office in the UK
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221113665openalex-snapshot
Explaining the migrant–native vote gap under open-list proportional representation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/13691481231221482openalex-snapshot
Local party members’ views are associated, but not completely congruent, with local constituency opinion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/13691481241270519openalex-snapshot
Inside the ‘secret garden’: Candidate selection at the 2019 UK general election
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5363/tits.28.2_38openalex-snapshot
Exploring Candidate Selection Processes in the UK: Climbing the ‘Political Glass Cliff’
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.