Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository
metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is
labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not
evidence of absence.
1 of the 60 references listed on this page is in the Retraction Watch database as retracted (export 2026-10-21): 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4070 (notice 2019-04-25).
Dataset join, best-effort; this page does not check the publisher record.
Retraction Watch data via Crossref Labs, used with credit; OpenCitations Index (CC0) and Meta (CC BY 4.0);
dataset doi:10.7910/DVN/WT8VOA (CC BY 4.0).
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
Effectiveness and Safety of Entecavir or Tenofovir in a Spanish Cohort of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: Validation of the Page-B Score to Predict Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Association of Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Therapy With Reduced Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B—A Nationwide Cohort Study
Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Core-Related Antigen During Nucleos(t)ide Analog Therapy Is Related to Intra-hepatic HBV Replication and Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Long‐term outcome and hepatocellular carcinoma development in chronic hepatitis B or cirrhosis patients after nucleoside analog treatment with entecavir or lamivudine
The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review
Antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: pharmacokinetics and side effects of interferon and adenine arabinoside alone and in combination
Effect of Antiviral Treatment With Nucleotide/Nucleoside Analogs on Postoperative Prognosis of Hepatitis B Virus–Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Two-Stage Longitudinal Clinical Study
Risk score model for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in treatment-naïve patients receiving oral antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis B
Tenofovir versus entecavir in lowering the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma development in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a critical systematic review and meta-analysis
Hepatocellular carcinoma risk in patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving tenofovir- vs. entecavir-based regimens: Individual patient data meta-analysis
Differential Effectiveness of Tenofovir and Entecavir for Prophylaxis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Depending on Coexisting Cirrhosis and Prior Exposure to Antiviral Therapy
Five‐year comparative risk of hepatocellular carcinoma development under entecavir or tenofovir treatment‐naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B‐related compensated cirrhosis in Taiwan
Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in treatment‐naïve chronic hepatitis B patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus entecavir in the United States
Comparison of tenofovir versus entecavir on reducing incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Magnitude of and prediction for risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B taking entecavir or tenofovir therapy: A systematic review
Cancer immunotherapy clinical trials to support urgently needed access in low- and middle-income countries: a report from the SITC global access and impact committee
Tenofovir Treatment Has Lower Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma than Entecavir Treatment in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in antiviral treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a network meta-analysis
Tenofovir alafenamide is superior to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir in cost-effectiveness of treatment of chronic hepatitis B in china with new volume-based procurement policy
No difference in hepatocellular carcinoma risk in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with tenofovir vs entecavir: evidence from an updated meta-analysis
Overview of methodologies and statistical strategies in observational studies and meta-analyses on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B on entecavir or tenofovir therapy
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is superior to Entecavir and Tenofovir alafenamide in Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B in China with New Volume-Based Purchasing Policy
Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Comparison of the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Antiviral-Naive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Treated with Entecavir versus Tenofovir: The Devil in the Detail
Greater Reductions in Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen Associated with Switching from Entecavir to Tenofovir Alafenamide Compared with Continued Entecavir Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Study
Comparison of the Efficacy of Entecavir and Tenofovir in Reducing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Real-Life Study in Turkey
ĐẶC ĐIỂM LÂM SÀNG, CẬN LÂM SÀNG Ở BỆNH NHÂN VIÊM GAN VI RÚT B MẠNTIẾN TRIỂN UNG THƯ GAN NGUYÊN PHÁT TẠI BỆNH VIỆN BỆNH NHIỆT ĐỚI TRUNG ƯƠNG
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.