On the public citation graph
Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory
0 signed · 237 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3258798openalex-extracted
Speech Acts as Means of Argumentation in Bank's Annual Reports
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3_2openalex-snapshot
Argumentation as an Object of Interest and as a Social and Cultural Resource
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9165-0_12openalex-snapshot
Whether and How Classical Topics can be Revived Within Contemporary Argumentation Theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20457-0_2openalex-snapshot
A Qualitative Methodology for Studying Parent–Child Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28367-4_13openalex-snapshot
Argumentative Abduction in the Interpretation Process: A Pragma-Dialectical Study of an Ironic Utterance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28367-4_2openalex-snapshot
Argument Schemes: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28367-4_4openalex-snapshot
Give the Standard Treatment of Fallacies a Chance! Cognitive and Rhetorical Insights into Fallacy Processing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16293-0_2openalex-snapshot
Agreement: An Argumentation Perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37156-1_12openalex-snapshot
Argument Mining and Analytics in Archaeology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-94094-1_2openalex-snapshot
Argumentation, Fallacies and Language
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-96177-9_13openalex-snapshot
Argument Mining in Scientific Communication: Comparative Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14343-9_5openalex-snapshot
Listen to Your Customers! How Hotels Manage Online Travel Reviews. The Case of Hotels in Lugano
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_26openalex-snapshot
Analysis and Evaluation of Argumentative Discourse
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_27openalex-snapshot
The Pragma-Dialectical Method of Analysis and Evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_8openalex-snapshot
The Case of Pragma-Dialectics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21103-9_14openalex-snapshot
A Means-End Classification of Argumentation Schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30549-3_3openalex-snapshot
Analysing Practical Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38983-7_28openalex-snapshot
Ad Hoc Hypothesis Generation as Enthymeme Resolution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48956-8_13openalex-snapshot
Ad Hoc Hypothesis Generation as Enthymeme Resolution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53562-3_14openalex-snapshot
The Generation of Argument Schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90918-9_1openalex-snapshot
Introduction: The Demonic/-ised Subaltern’s In-sight
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6_1openalex-snapshot
Argumentation Theory as a Discipline
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35731-2_15openalex-snapshot
Argumentation and Intuitive Decision Making: Criminal Sentencing and Sentence Indication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5_11openalex-snapshot
Argumentation and Artificial Intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_14openalex-snapshot
Argumentative Topoi for Refutation and Confirmation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6883-3_11-1openalex-snapshot
Argumentation and Artificial Intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6883-3_11-2openalex-snapshot
Argumentation and Artificial Intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1063-1_2openalex-snapshot
Meaning and Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-340-7_10openalex-snapshot
Seeking Success of Migrant Students through Designed Tasks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5334-7_8openalex-snapshot
‘Remember Our Race, Our Religion and Our Progeny’: An Argumentation Analysis of Malay-Language Newspapers During General Election Campaigns
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-015-0888-6openalex-snapshot
Mining contentious documents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-025-09692-xopenalex-snapshot
An introduction to computational argumentation research from a human argumentation perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-0511-1openalex-snapshot
Reconstructing and Evaluating Genetic Arguments in Judicial Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-4418-7openalex-snapshot
AI & Law, Logic and Argument Schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-006-9000-4openalex-snapshot
Argumentation: The Mixed Game
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9049-8openalex-snapshot
Pragmatic Inconsistency and Credibility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9058-7openalex-snapshot
Dissociation and Presupposition in Discourse: A Corpus Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9061-zopenalex-snapshot
“Eat your Hamburger!”—“No, I don’t Want to!” Argumentation and Argumentative Development in the Context of Dinner Conversation in Twenty Swedish Families
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-009-9167-6openalex-snapshot
Negotiating Problems of Written Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-010-9179-2openalex-snapshot
On the Argumentative Strength of Indirect Inferential Conditionals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-010-9190-7openalex-snapshot
Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9225-8openalex-snapshot
The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9227-6openalex-snapshot
Towards a Critique-Friendly Approach to the Straw Man Fallacy Evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9257-0openalex-snapshot
Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-012-9284-5openalex-snapshot
What Students’ Arguments Can Tell Us: Using Argumentation Schemes in Science Education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-013-9296-9openalex-snapshot
Strategies of Visual Argumentation in Slideshow Presentations: The Role of the Visuals in an Al Gore Presentation on Climate Change
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9323-5openalex-snapshot
Processing Topics from the Beneficial Cognitive Model in Partially and Over-Successful Persuasion Dialogues
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9359-1openalex-snapshot
The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-017-9436-8openalex-snapshot
“You Think That Says a Lot, but Really it Says Nothing”: An Argumentative and Linguistic Account of an Idiomatic Expression Functioning as a Presentational Device
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-017-9444-8openalex-snapshot
The Conjunction of a French Rhetoric of Unity with a Competing Nationalism in New Caledonia: A Critical Discourse Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09512-4openalex-snapshot
Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09519-xopenalex-snapshot
Annotating Argument Schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09523-1openalex-snapshot
The Study of Metaphor in Argumentation Theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-021-09549-zopenalex-snapshot
Designing Critical Questions for Argumentation Schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-022-09573-7openalex-snapshot
Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-024-09644-xopenalex-snapshot
The Recursive Argument Structure
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-025-09653-4openalex-snapshot
Exploring Visual Argument from Latent Authority in Short Video Advertising
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-026-09730-2openalex-snapshot
James B. Freeman: Adequate Connections: Assessing Argument Ground Adequacy: Argumentation Library 38: Cham, Switzerland, Springer 2025, xiii + 179 pp., 11 b/w figures
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09899-1openalex-snapshot
The Irish Public Discourse on Covid-19 at the Intersection of Legislation, Fake News and Judicial Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-6198-xopenalex-snapshot
Argumentation Schemes and Enthymemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0248-6openalex-snapshot
Interpreting enthymematic arguments using belief revision
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-025-10289-yopenalex-snapshot
A Competence-based Approach To the Principle of Charity in Argument Reconstruction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.11.002openalex-snapshot
The effect of goal instructions and need for cognition on interactive argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2015.05.004openalex-snapshot
Extraction and clustering of arguing expressions in contentious text
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.003openalex-snapshot
Analysing multiple addressivity in research interviews: A methodological suggestion from argumentation theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.018openalex-snapshot
Presumptive arguments turned into a fallacy of presumptuousness: Pre-election debates in a democracy of promises
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.019openalex-snapshot
Metaphors and argumentation: The case of Chilean parliamentarian media participation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.011openalex-snapshot
Keywords, frames and the reconstruction of material starting points in argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.014openalex-snapshot
Institutional argumentation and conflict prevention: The case of the Swiss Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.021openalex-snapshot
“For crying out loud, don't call me a warrior”: Standpoints of resistance against violence metaphors for cancer
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.12.001openalex-snapshot
Pragmatics for argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511616389openalex-snapshot
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511616389.003openalex-snapshot
The realm of argumentation studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511616389.004openalex-snapshot
A model of a critical discussion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511616389.006openalex-snapshot
Analysis as reconstruction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511616389.007openalex-snapshot
Rules for a critical discussion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511616389.009openalex-snapshot
A code of conduct for reasonable discussants
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139565776openalex-snapshot
Emotive Language in Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1351324923000062openalex-snapshot
Argumentation models and their use in corpus annotation: Practice, prospects, and challenges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026338402751openalex-snapshot
The Development of the Pragma-dialectical Approach to Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.10.09sanopenalex-snapshot
Context and genre in judicial argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.12.17gatopenalex-snapshot
Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.12.18tseopenalex-snapshot
Analysing multimodal argumentation within the pragma-dialectical framework
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.14.01tseopenalex-snapshot
Argumentation and rhetoric in visual and multimodal communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.14.10jacopenalex-snapshot
Embodied argumentation in public debates
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17.10braopenalex-snapshot
Prototypical argumentative patterns in activist discourse
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.18openalex-snapshot
The Quest for Argumentative Equivalence: Argumentative Patterns in Political Interpreting Contexts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.18.c1openalex-snapshot
Strategic manoeuvring in political interpreting contexts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.22.06braopenalex-snapshot
Argumentative style in international adoption dossiers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.8.appendixopenalex-snapshot
Annex 1. List of cases and relevant information
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.8.c2openalex-snapshot
Chapter 2. The argumentative intervention in context
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.8.c3openalex-snapshot
Chapter 3. Eliciting argumentative situations in takeover bids
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.8.c4openalex-snapshot
Chapter 4. The offer procedure as an argumentative activity a type
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.8.c5openalex-snapshot
Chapter 5. The argumentative coordination in friendly offers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.8.c6openalex-snapshot
Chapter 6. The argumentative opposition in hostile bids
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/aic.8.c7openalex-snapshot
Chapter 7. Refuting the endoxical basis of the opposite argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/fol.18055.pouopenalex-snapshot
Presupposed evaluation in environmental argumentative discourse
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.00030.stoopenalex-snapshot
Detecting generic patterns in multimodal argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18010.kohopenalex-snapshot
From inference processes to situations of misunderstanding
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.19020.bogopenalex-snapshot
“Completely impartial opinion, okay?”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.4.3.03braopenalex-snapshot
Argumentative equivalence as the reproduction of strategic maneuvering in interpreted texts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.1.03palopenalex-snapshot
Predictions in economic-financial news
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.6.1.04snoopenalex-snapshot
Argumentative patterns using symptomatic argumentation in OTC-medicine advertisements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.6.2.02gatopenalex-snapshot
Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.6.2.03palopenalex-snapshot
Practical reasoning in corporate communication with multiple audiences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.2.02bovopenalex-snapshot
Beyond Conflicts: Origin and Types of Issues Leading to Argumentative Discussions During Family Mealtimes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242.14rysopenalex-snapshot
Exploring academic argumentation in course-related blogs through ENGAGEMENT
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.306.06kopopenalex-snapshot
From ‘country’ to ‘confederation’ – debating terms of reference for the EU on a Wikipedia talk page
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.3.09tseopenalex-snapshot
Use and abuse of the strategic function ofin factandfranklywhen qualifying a standpoint
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00131910600796777openalex-snapshot
Argumentation, critical thinking and the postgraduate dissertation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701243636openalex-snapshot
Children's roles and use of evidence in science: an analysis of decision‐making in small groups
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09500780508668803openalex-snapshot
Engaging Electronically: Using CMC to Develop Students’ Argumentation Skills in Higher Education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2023.2294236openalex-snapshot
Nonverbal communication as argumentation: the case of political television debates
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1948334openalex-snapshot
Countering Undesirable Implications of Violence Metaphors for Cancer through Metaphor Extension
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2019.1587702openalex-snapshot
Royal Interventions in the Public Discourse on Immigration: Rhetorical Topoi on Immigration in the New Year’s Speeches of the Scandinavian Monarchs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2018.1553083openalex-snapshot
Ostracism and the EU’s contradictory approach to sanctions at home and abroad
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1386979032000186863openalex-snapshot
A new dialectical theory of explanation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2025.2528069openalex-snapshot
Rhetorical strategies in the speeches of Mrs America
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17437270802417150openalex-snapshot
Using exchange structure analysis to explore argument in text‐based computer conferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2017.1350585openalex-snapshot
Online visit opinions about attractions of the religious heritage: an argumentative approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzz046openalex-snapshot
Argument evaluation in multi-agent justification logics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190844035.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Political Persuasion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190844035.003.0002openalex-snapshot
Value Recruitment Defined
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190844035.003.0003openalex-snapshot
Teaching Intelligent Design
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190844035.003.0004openalex-snapshot
Intelligent Design Interviews
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190844035.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Intelligent Design Experiments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190844035.003.0006openalex-snapshot
Snowmobiles in Yellowstone
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190844035.003.0007openalex-snapshot
Yellowstone Interviews
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190844035.003.0008openalex-snapshot
Yellowstone Experiments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icdm.2014.120openalex-snapshot
Mining Contentious Documents Using an Unsupervised Topic Model Based Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12276openalex-snapshot
The Appeal to Expert Opinion: Quantitative Support for a Bayesian Network Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.m18.tpeaopenalex-snapshot
Tutorías pares de escritura académica: ¿Qué estrategias promueven tutoras con diversa experiencia?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1163/15685330-12341182openalex-snapshot
Between Dialectic and Rhetoric: Rhetorical Questions Expressing Premises in Biblical Prose Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512471758openalex-snapshot
Re/constructing the past: How young people remember the Uruguayan dictatorship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513508858openalex-snapshot
Parental discourse and identity management in the talk of indigenous and migrant speakers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/102986490601000101openalex-snapshot
Zipf's law and the creation of musical context
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016676602openalex-snapshot
Favorite Battlegrounds of Climate Action
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-016-0026-0openalex-snapshot
Exploiting the ‘non-dit’ and other discursive tactics in the New Caledonian independence debate: a pragma-functional approach to critical discourse analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1353/par.0.0011openalex-snapshot
Room for Maneuver When Raising Critical Doubt
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0137openalex-snapshot
Argumentation in participant-driven photo interviews: A case in ICT for development in Mozambique
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15388/respectus.2018.33.38.03openalex-snapshot
Implicit Elements in the Argument Structure: The Problems of Interpretation and Methods of Reconstruction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v26n3a10openalex-snapshot
Las tutorías de escritura académica presenciales y virtuales: ¿qué podemos aprender sobre sus estrategias didácticas?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala/v26n3a10openalex-snapshot
Las tutorías de escritura académica presenciales y virtuales: ¿qué podemos aprender sobre sus estrategias didácticas?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v31i2.1176openalex-snapshot
A Comparative Genre Study of Spoken English Produced by Chinese EFL Learners and Native English Speakers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0136/cgp/v28i02/19-34openalex-snapshot
Discourse as a Generator of Epistemic Relativism in Scientific Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21608/jwadi.2023.278022openalex-snapshot
تطورات أسس الحجاج Developments of the Foundations of Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2024.113openalex-snapshot
Historical Contextualisation of the Word Loyalty in the Discourse of the European Parliament
showing the first 200 of 237 · page through all 237
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.