On the public citation graph

THE CONSEQUENCES OF SPEAKING OUT: PROCESSES OF HOSTILITY AND ISSUE RESOLUTION INVOLVING FEDERAL WHISTLEBLOWERS.

https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1992.17516059

0 signed · 15 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2906120openalex-extracted

Incidence of Whistle-blowing in the Public and Private Sectors

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf02622256openalex-snapshot

Don’t kill the messenger! Whistle-blowing in America — A review with recommendations

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1880-2openalex-snapshot

Whistle-Blowing Systems and Legitimacy Theory: A Study of the Motivation to Implement Whistle-Blowing Systems in German Organizations

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-7301(05)24003-3openalex-snapshot

Standing Up or Standing By: What Predicts Blowing the Whistle on Organizational Wrongdoing?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2017.1315235openalex-snapshot

Where to report wrongdoings? Exploring the determinants of internal versus external whistleblowing

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-60752-705-320251012openalex-snapshot

Stopping Organizational Wrongdoing

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12946openalex-snapshot

Internal Whistle‐Blowing in the Public Service: A Matter of Trust

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702055004463openalex-snapshot

What Makes Whistle-Blowers Effective? Three Field Studies

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704043273openalex-snapshot

Blowing the Whistle on Sexual Harassment: Test of a Model of Predictors and Outcomes

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712447004openalex-snapshot

Predicting employee reactions to perceived organizational wrongdoing: Demoralization, justice, proactive personality, and whistle-blowing

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/001872679905200705openalex-snapshot

Predicting Intentions to Report Administrative and Disciplinary Infractions: Applying the Reasoned Action Model

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/014920639402000405openalex-snapshot

Relationships Among Value Congruence, Perceived Victimization, and Retaliation Against Whistle-blowers

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200306openalex-snapshot

Whistle-Blowing: Myth and Reality

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x221078784openalex-snapshot

Whistleblowing in the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.32477/jrm.v4i1.59openalex-snapshot

PENGARUH FAKTOR DEMOGRAFI DAN IKLIM ORGANISASI TERHADAP NIAT WHISTLEBLOWING INTERNAL

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.