On the public citation graph

Constructive controversy as a way to create "true collaboration" in an open ended group project setting

0 signed · 5 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3380120openalex-extracted

Conflict Resolution with Constructive Controversy, Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2015.7344344openalex-snapshot

A comparative analysis of two globally distributed group projects: A perspective from CSCW/CSCL research

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--17187openalex-snapshot

Integrating Global Systems Development Skills into the Engineering Curriculum

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28358openalex-snapshot

Finding Möjligheter: Creativity and Ill-Structured Problems

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.37256/ser.4120232058openalex-snapshot

Teaching Method as a Critical Issue in Science Education in Ghana

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.