On the public citation graph

Painting the White House green: rationalizing environmental policy inside the executive office of the president

https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-2925
0 signed · 15 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1350027openalex-extracted
Issues in Designing U.S. Climate Change Policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2236198openalex-extracted
Designing a Bretton Woods Institution to Address Climate Change
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2715438openalex-extracted
Policy Surveillance in the G-20 Fossil Fuel Subsidies Agreement: Lessons for Climate Policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.976542openalex-extracted
Formulas for Quantitative Emission Targets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1505-0openalex-snapshot
Policy surveillance in the G-20 fossil fuel subsidies agreement: lessons for climate policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-007-9088-3openalex-snapshot
Setting greenhouse gas emission targets under baseline uncertainty: the Bush Climate Change Initiative
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-53685-3.00010-6openalex-snapshot
Environmental Risk and Uncertainty
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.03.003openalex-snapshot
Benefits and costs to China of three different climate treaties
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800190openalex-snapshot
Ambushed: The Kyoto Protocol, the Bush Administration's Climate Policy and the Erosion of Legitimacy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1119098openalex-snapshot
Comparing emissions mitigation efforts across countries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00207.xopenalex-snapshot
Future U.S. Climate Policy: International Re-engagement?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1142/s2010007820400011openalex-snapshot
ROLLING THE DICE IN THE CORRIDORS OF POWER: WILLIAM NORDHAUS’S IMPACTS ON CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018795287openalex-snapshot
Public Comments’ Influence on Science Use in U.S. Rulemaking: The Case of EPA’s National Emission Standards
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110380964openalex-snapshot
Why the United States did not become a party to the Kyoto Protocol: German, Norwegian, and US perspectives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2009.0624openalex-snapshot
Australia's emissions trading scheme: opportunities and obstacles for linking
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.