On the public citation graph

Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations

https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.47338
0 signed · 381 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90openalex-snapshot
The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140405openalex-snapshot
Citation indexes in sociological and historical research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_8openalex-snapshot
The Use of Bibliometrics for Assessing Research: Possibilities, Limitations and Adverse Effects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2036-xopenalex-snapshot
History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9517-0openalex-snapshot
The Disaster of the Impact Factor
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.09.002openalex-snapshot
Calling all journal editors: Bury the metrics pages!
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4608(97)00459-7openalex-snapshot
The Journal “Impact Factor”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/441792bopenalex-snapshot
Cash for papers: putting a premium on publication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/520429aopenalex-snapshot
Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2008.77openalex-snapshot
Bias in genetic association studies and impact factor
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2697openalex-snapshot
The need for transparency and good practices in the qPCR literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3439-c1openalex-snapshot
Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/wentk/9780190640118.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Measuring Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-01-2017-0014openalex-snapshot
Publish or impoverish
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/dlp-01-2017-0004openalex-snapshot
The Leiden Manifesto under review: what libraries can learn from it
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00064-14openalex-snapshot
Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497openalex-snapshot
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38359.695220.82openalex-snapshot
Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008681openalex-snapshot
How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-76openalex-snapshot
Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-21openalex-snapshot
Authors' opinions on publication in relation to annual performance assessment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16493.1openalex-snapshot
The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.4929.1363openalex-snapshot
The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2002.0028openalex-snapshot
Uncovering the Values in Faculty Evaluation of Service as Scholarship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000797openalex-snapshot
Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089openalex-snapshot
Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291openalex-snapshot
The Impact Factor Game
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063221openalex-snapshot
A Survey on Data Reproducibility in Cancer Research Provides Insights into Our Limited Ability to Translate Findings from the Laboratory to the Clinic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109019openalex-snapshot
The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200312000-00028openalex-snapshot
UNDERSTANDING THE LIMITATIONS OF THE JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2777/337729openalex-snapshot
Next-Generation Metrics: Reponsible Metrics and Evaluation for Open Science. Report of the European Commission Expert Group on Altmetrics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291openalex-snapshot
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037openalex-snapshot
Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v67n0106openalex-snapshot
Validity of the Impact Factor of Journals as a Measure of Randomized Controlled Trial Quality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3978573.v1openalex-snapshot
Next-generation altmetrics: responsible metrics and evaluation for open science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.42254openalex-snapshot
How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/vy4tjeopenalex-snapshot
Terms and Concepts found in Tenure and Promotion Guidelines from the US and Canada

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.110.136048zenodo-depositor-declared
20 years of bibliometric data illustrates a lack of concordance between journal impact factor and fungal species discovery in systematic mycology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781394322183.app2openalex-snapshot
Appendix 2: Initiatives to Improve the Quality of Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781394322183.ch7openalex-snapshot
Why Do Researchers Falsify Data or Manipulate Study Findings?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14537openalex-snapshot
Promotion and tenure for medical physicists should be based on article specific measures and not on journal impact factor
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24445openalex-snapshot
Conjoint analysis of researchers' hidden preferences for bibliometrics, altmetrics, and usage metrics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24706openalex-snapshot
Uses of the Journal Impact Factor in national journal rankings in China and Europe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24767openalex-snapshot
In which fields are citations indicators of research quality?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/its2.140openalex-snapshot
Analysis of turfgrass research papers 2008–2019: Implications and future opportunities for the International Turfgrass Society
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1571openalex-snapshot
A multidimensional journal evaluation framework based on the Pareto‐dominated set measured by the Manhattan distance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77127-0openalex-snapshot
Towards a Sustainable Future - Life Cycle Management
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77127-0_26openalex-snapshot
Research Activities on LCA and LCM in Poland
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25617-2_7openalex-snapshot
Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27111-3_8openalex-snapshot
Science Evaluation: Peer Review, Bibliometrics, and Research Impact Assessment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28035-1_31openalex-snapshot
Exploring the Association Between Multiple Classifications and Journal Rankings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29455-6_27openalex-snapshot
Research Assessments Should Recognize Responsible Research Practices. Narrative Review of a Lively Debate and Promising Developments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84036-4_13openalex-snapshot
Clinicians Heavily Involved in Research: Clinician-Scientist, Clinician-Investigators, and Similar Tracks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84036-4_3openalex-snapshot
What Counts for Academic Promotion?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84036-4_7openalex-snapshot
Strategies for Success: The Long Game
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84036-4_9openalex-snapshot
Practical Approaches and Pearls to Completing a Successful Application
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-92469-9_8openalex-snapshot
Wissenschaftliche Bewertung: Peer-Review, Bibliometrie und Forschungsimpact-Bewertung
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7018-4_2openalex-snapshot
What Is a Grant? How to Prepare a Grant Proposal Application
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-021-02120-3openalex-snapshot
The 1-h fraud detection challenge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-025-04651-5openalex-snapshot
The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03165-9openalex-snapshot
Authorship by gender in anesthesiology journals: a retrospective cross-sectional study for Japan
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12801-0openalex-snapshot
Mapping knowledge and research trend on technology adoption in higher education: A bibliometric analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01302-1openalex-snapshot
Mentoring matters: examining the relationship between adviser interactions and doctoral student publications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-026-01661-xopenalex-snapshot
Book review of the making universities matter
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09628-3openalex-snapshot
Publication Patterns of Higher Education Research Using Quantitative Criticalism and QuantCrit Perspectives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-025-09592-0openalex-snapshot
Internationalizing Doctoral Education: Examining the Relationship Between International Engagement Opportunities and Research Production
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-021-00531-7openalex-snapshot
Mycopathologia 2020: Legacy and Change to Remain Relevant for Content, Creation, and Communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-022-09718-3openalex-snapshot
Predicting Research Productivity in STEM Faculty: The Role of Self-determined Motivation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03339-xopenalex-snapshot
The role of Web of Science publications in China’s tenure system
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03349-0openalex-snapshot
Charting the Open Access scholarly journals landscape in the UAE
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03651-xopenalex-snapshot
Comparing the impact of subfields in scientific journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03812-yopenalex-snapshot
Citation inequality and the Journal Impact Factor: median, mean, (does it) matter?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04118-3openalex-snapshot
A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04402-wopenalex-snapshot
When a journal is both at the ‘top’ and the ‘bottom’: the illogicality of conflating citation-based metrics with quality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04576-3openalex-snapshot
A logical set theory approach to journal subject classification analysis: intra-system irregularities and inter-system discrepancies in Web of Science and Scopus
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04655-zopenalex-snapshot
Institutional drivers of research productivity: a canonical multivariate analysis of Romanian public universities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04735-0openalex-snapshot
In which fields do higher impact journals publish higher quality articles?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04855-7openalex-snapshot
From citation metrics to citation ethics: Critical examination of a highly-cited 2017 moth pheromone paper
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05115-yopenalex-snapshot
Through the secret gate: a study of member-contributed submissions in PNAS
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05586-1openalex-snapshot
Citation distance matters: towards a new metric for evaluating journal impact
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00352-3openalex-snapshot
An Ethical Exploration of Increased Average Number of Authors Per Publication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-025-09854-3openalex-snapshot
Stigmatizing Labels Used for Individuals Involved in the Criminal Legal System: A Meta-Study of Academic Literature
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-021-00894-2openalex-snapshot
Bee surveys in Brazil in the last six decades: a review and scientometrics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00626-9openalex-snapshot
Knowledge syntheses in medical education: A bibliometric analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-026-00510-yopenalex-snapshot
Human capital and economic growth: a meta-analytic reassessment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00122-7openalex-snapshot
Distance education as a tool to improve researchers’ knowledge on predatory journals in countries with limited resources: the Moroccan experience
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-026-00666-0openalex-snapshot
The Machine Consumes Itself: Artificial Intelligence and the End of Publish-or-Perish
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-01004-5openalex-snapshot
Science faculty perceptions of the promotion and tenure process at major research universities in the United States
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-817218-6.00012-7openalex-snapshot
Rigor and reproducibility in genetic research and the effects on scientific reporting and public discourse
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102941openalex-snapshot
Growth of Knowledge Synthesis in a University Setting: Types, Disciplines, and Librarian Involvement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103142openalex-snapshot
Library science literature, 2019–2025: An exploration using critical bibliometric methods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111445openalex-snapshot
Slaying the hydra of journal impact factor obsession in evaluating conservation biology research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2026.109000openalex-snapshot
Microbe-specific and product-specific strategies for scalable biomanufacturing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjao.2021.100001openalex-snapshot
BJA Open: a new open access journal for anaesthesiology, critical care, and pain medicine
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100067openalex-snapshot
Equitable access to TPACK research: Tensions about using social media to disseminate scholarship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.04.010openalex-snapshot
Mitigating delayed academic promotion of female radiologists due to the COVID pandemic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110679openalex-snapshot
Amplifying signal-to-noise: Responsible use of large language models in radiology publishing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108932openalex-snapshot
Twenty-six years anniversary (1992–2018) of Food Research International: An overview of research trends
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.08.018openalex-snapshot
Publication Disparity in Lymphomatous Hematologic Radiation Oncology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2023.e00423openalex-snapshot
Don't always judge an article by its cover: An examination of proxies for journal impact and citations in entrepreneurship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101073openalex-snapshot
Introducing recalibrated academic performance indicators in the evaluation of individuals’ research performance: A case study from Eastern Europe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2025.101757openalex-snapshot
Assessing scientific output through self-evaluation: Evidence from four social science fields
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2026.101816openalex-snapshot
Author team size as a structural pathway of citation impact: A transformation-robust bibliometric analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2026.07.003openalex-snapshot
Pipeline: Eugene Garfield, Ph.D. and bibliometrics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.12.004openalex-snapshot
Disrupting research in orthopedics: Reasons for facing the challenge of change
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.103039openalex-snapshot
Global research trends on photodynamic therapy in endodontics: A bibliometric analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcot.2020.01.005openalex-snapshot
Disrupter la recherche en orthopédie : les raisons d’oser le changement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104226openalex-snapshot
The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104484openalex-snapshot
How status of research papers affects the way they are read and cited
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104829openalex-snapshot
Do bibliometrics introduce gender, institutional or interdisciplinary biases into research evaluations?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ringeo.2020.100001openalex-snapshot
The growth of open access publishing in geochemistry
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.080openalex-snapshot
Gender Differences in Authorship in Urology: a Five-year Review of Publications in Five High-impact Journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.11.041openalex-snapshot
Authorship Gender Composition in Urology Literature From 2015 Through 2020
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.020openalex-snapshot
Academic Productivity of Neurosurgeons Practicing in Joint Residency Advisory and Accreditation Committee Accredited Programs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009342513.006openalex-snapshot
Use Productive Research Approaches
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10067openalex-snapshot
Academic influencers: Clinical and Translational Science scholars and trainees at the intersection of influential scholarship and public attention
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000679openalex-snapshot
Impact Factor Wars
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387openalex-snapshot
Seven Easy Steps to Open Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1029/2024cn000240openalex-snapshot
Replaying the Tape of Academia: Fourteen Alternative Practices for the Physical Sciences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01759-5openalex-snapshot
Impact factor abandoned by Dutch university in hiring and promotion decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00212-1openalex-snapshot
‘Stamp out paper mills’ — science sleuths on how to fight fake research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-023-01075-5openalex-snapshot
Wavering impact-factor trajectories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1openalex-snapshot
Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02575-5openalex-snapshot
How contemporary academic structures constrain scientific creativity and hold back early-career researchers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08422-9openalex-snapshot
Regional and institutional trends in assessment for academic promotion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04667-1openalex-snapshot
Reproducibility in biomedical research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46050-xopenalex-snapshot
Early-career factors largely determine the future impact of prominent researchers: evidence across eight scientific fields
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45844-zopenalex-snapshot
Gender shapes the relationship between productivity and journal prestige in science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00647-zopenalex-snapshot
The transformative power of values-enacted scholarship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/pc22041openalex-snapshot
There are many ways for research to be influential, not just citations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911911116openalex-snapshot
Impact factor impacts on early-career scientist careers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2507394122openalex-snapshot
Geographical diversity of peer reviewers shapes author success
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2022.2095993openalex-snapshot
Centralising professional staff: is this another instrument of symbolic violence in the managerialised university?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2023.2237150openalex-snapshot
Synthesis of Publication Metrics in Kinesiology-Related Journals: Proxies for Rigor, Usage, and Prestige
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2025.2603938openalex-snapshot
Properties of Kinesiology-Related Journals According to Cabells Journalytics Not Apparent in Other Journal Metrics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2026.2727347openalex-snapshot
Evaluating and Predicting Journal Performance for Serials Assessment: A Multidimensional Bibliometric and Machine Learning Analysis of First Quartile Strategy and Management Journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0361526x.2024.2312114openalex-snapshot
From Research to Publication: Understanding the Publishing Landscape in Architectural Studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1909481openalex-snapshot
Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2141625openalex-snapshot
Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2295415openalex-snapshot
Correlation between journal metrics-based academic evaluation and researchers’ ethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2022.2106166openalex-snapshot
A critical review of the proposed academic performance indicators for the assessment of individual researchers in Hungary
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2022.2082917openalex-snapshot
The methodological rigour of systematic reviews in environmental health
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2023.2261797openalex-snapshot
What Happens after Tenure? Exploring Stimuli of Promotion to Full Professor in Top-Ranking Criminology and Criminal Justice Programs in the United States
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2026.2736417openalex-snapshot
Use Characteristics of Indexed Scholarly Communication Venues (ISCVs): The Case of Library and Information Science Scholars in Nigeria
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2023.2272152openalex-snapshot
Using research to build power: the Pittsburgh Wage study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2024.2341849openalex-snapshot
Are There Meaningful Prestige Metrics of Kinesiology-Related Journals?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2026.2621420openalex-snapshot
Bibliometrics of Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science Over the Last Twenty-Five Years
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2024.2347306openalex-snapshot
Assessing publication trends in selected GIScience journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2024.2320765openalex-snapshot
Open knowledge disclosure and firm value: a signalling theory perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2026.2663725openalex-snapshot
Research Expectation Details in Expectations Documents: The Case of Mathematics Education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/2372966x.2021.2000841openalex-snapshot
Realignment of School Psychology Research, Training, and Practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2023.2216212openalex-snapshot
Sport management journals should be rated higher in journal ranking lists! Towards a better international recognition of the field
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1960180openalex-snapshot
Gendered citation practices in the field of communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/anncom/wlaf004openalex-snapshot
Communication scholarship impact reality check: a comparison of SSCI journals’ research orientations and citation metrics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/anncom/wlaf023openalex-snapshot
Authors’ gender and productivity as predictors of reciprocal dynamics in publications and citations in communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac049openalex-snapshot
Valuation regimes in academia: Researchers’ attitudes towards their diversity of activities and academic performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae007openalex-snapshot
Practicing responsible research assessment: Qualitative study of faculty hiring, promotion, and tenure assessments in the United States
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae044openalex-snapshot
Formal authorship in the wake of uncertain futures: the narrative of publish or perish in the humanities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae045openalex-snapshot
Noted, but not decisive. A cross-disciplinary analysis of metrics usage in Polish evaluative cultures
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag008openalex-snapshot
Digging deeper into data citations: recognizing and rewarding data work
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac059openalex-snapshot
Fostering a research integrity culture: Actionable advice for institutions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad073openalex-snapshot
Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: individual and perceived institutional priorities in review, promotion, and tenure
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaf003openalex-snapshot
A delicate balance: responsible evaluation, tenure review, and the pursuit of institutional innovation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaf076openalex-snapshot
Perspectives on recognizing open research data in research assessment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000031052openalex-snapshot
Research features between Urology and Nephrology authors in articles regarding UTI related to CKD, HD, PD, and renal transplantation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000039234openalex-snapshot
Identifying authorial roles in research: A Kano model-based bibliometric analysis for the Journal of Medicine (Baltimore) 2023
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000001488openalex-snapshot
Addressing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusivity Contributions in Academic Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000008800openalex-snapshot
Beyond the Impact Factor in Peer-Reviewed Literature: What Really Matters
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220334openalex-snapshot
Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221460openalex-snapshot
Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.252032openalex-snapshot
Examining a citation advantage for publicly accessible articles in special education journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.01.128355openalex-snapshot
TeamTree analysis: a new approach to evaluate scientific production
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.01.181669openalex-snapshot
Task specialization across research careers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.07.556750openalex-snapshot
Analysis of citation dynamics reveals that you do not receive enough recognition for your influential science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.17.23295682openalex-snapshot
An International, Cross-Sectional Survey of Preprinting Attitudes Among Biomedical Researchers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.28.615619openalex-snapshot
Current Reporting Practices in Human Neuroscience Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1101/802850openalex-snapshot
Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in faculties of biomedical sciences: a cross-sectional analysis of 146 universities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033158openalex-snapshot
Association between productivity and journal impact across disciplines and career age
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80262-685-820241004openalex-snapshot
Recognition and Rewards in Academia – Recent Trends in Assessment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/9781802626858openalex-snapshot
Talent Management in Higher Education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-10-2019-0300openalex-snapshot
What we can learn from elite academic staff publication portfolios: a social network analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/emjb-05-2020-0039openalex-snapshot
Which journal ranking list? A case study in business and economics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/itp-01-2023-0032openalex-snapshot
Quantified academics: Heideggerian technology critical analysis of the academic ranking competition
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/apha.13710openalex-snapshot
A further increase in Acta Physiologica’s impact factor
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14391openalex-snapshot
Role of low‐impact‐factor journals in conservation implementation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70575openalex-snapshot
Highlighting Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency of Research in an Academic CV
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14395openalex-snapshot
David versus Goliath: Early career researchers in an unethical publishing system
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12459openalex-snapshot
Family and Consumer Sciences Researchers' publishing prospects: Review of three research journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.12455openalex-snapshot
Are we playing the same “research” game in business?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13015openalex-snapshot
Impact factor rankings for sleep research journals between 2005 and 2018
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12316openalex-snapshot
(When) should psychology be a science?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1123/smej.2024-0012openalex-snapshot
A Content Analysis of the Sport Management Education Journal: 2007–2023
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2020-0182openalex-snapshot
A Survey of Applied Impact of Literature in Sport Psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aec0494openalex-snapshot
Editorial and peer review dynamics at elite general science journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2081openalex-snapshot
Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035168openalex-snapshot
Definitions of blinding in randomised controlled trials of interventions published in high-impact anaesthesiology journals: a methodological study and survey of authors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117895openalex-snapshot
Evaluation of methodology, reporting and transparency of 50 highly cited randomised trials in neurology: a cross-sectional analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2020-0044openalex-snapshot
Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in faculties of medicine: a cross-sectional study of the Canadian U15 universities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2022-0242openalex-snapshot
The White House’s march towards open science: implications for Canada
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.229016openalex-snapshot
Radiology and the Impact Factor
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1161/atvbaha.122.317426openalex-snapshot
Web of Science’s Citation Median Metrics Overcome the Major Constraints of the Journal Impact Factor
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00125openalex-snapshot
Textual analysis of artificial intelligence manuscripts reveals features associated with peer review outcome
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00128openalex-snapshot
Inferring the causal effect of journals on citations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00224openalex-snapshot
Indicators of research quality, quantity, openness, and responsibility in institutional review, promotion, and tenure policies across seven countries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00113921261434021openalex-snapshot
Bibliometric (in)visibilities in the global social sciences: Revisiting regional dynamics across Web of Science, Scopus, and OpenAlex (1980–2023)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/01655515211039665openalex-snapshot
Determinants of societal and academic recognition: Evidence from randomised controlled trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/01945998221088751openalex-snapshot
Distribution of Article Citation Frequency, Citation Skew, and Impact Factor in Otolaryngology Journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0379572119885484openalex-snapshot
The Next 40 Years of Impact of the Food and Nutrition Bulletin
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/05390184211021364openalex-snapshot
If you do not deign to quantify, someone else will do it for you: In support of a balanced approach to the evaluation of science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/07419325251379789openalex-snapshot
Introduction to the Special Series: Examining the Special Education Research Base
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10525629211062591openalex-snapshot
Getting Published in JME: Top 10 Tips From the Co-Editors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x251320494openalex-snapshot
“But what is next?”: Culture & Psychology ’s next chapter
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231182568openalex-snapshot
Shifting the Level of Selection in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211031868openalex-snapshot
Assessment of Research Topic Prevalence by Journal Impact Quartile in Oral Health Sciences Using Bayesian Methods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221120217openalex-snapshot
Journal N-Pact Factors From 2011 to 2019: Evaluating the Quality of Social/Personality Journals With Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/25152459251357568openalex-snapshot
A Cross-Sectional Study of the Completeness of Preregistrations by Psychological Authors From German-Speaking Institutions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/25152459251372115openalex-snapshot
A Window Into the State of the Science: Current Reporting Practices Related to Generalizability in MRI and Functional-MRI Studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03435-2openalex-snapshot
Faculty appointment and promotion in Taiwan’s medical schools, a systematic analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12919-021-00221-8openalex-snapshot
Preparing for tenure at a research-intensive university
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01928-1openalex-snapshot
Honorary authorship in health sciences: a protocol for a systematic review of survey research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02167-8openalex-snapshot
Study results from journals with a higher impact factor are closer to “truth”: a meta-epidemiological study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00530-7openalex-snapshot
The 100 most impactful articles on the rotator cuff: an altmetric analysis of online media
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00092-1openalex-snapshot
The limitations to our understanding of peer review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00323-0openalex-snapshot
Metrics to evaluate implementation scientists in the USA: what matters most?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.133710.1openalex-snapshot
Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Science research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.133710.2openalex-snapshot
Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Access research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.143013.1openalex-snapshot
An international, cross-sectional survey of preprint attitudes among biomedical researchers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.152168.1openalex-snapshot
Trust in open publishing practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19619.1openalex-snapshot
Preprints and Scholarly Communication: Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19619.2openalex-snapshot
Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23418.2openalex-snapshot
Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.553openalex-snapshot
Lecturers’ Aptitudes, Attitudes and Professional Development in Higher Education at University of Cuenca
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.13169/prometheus.40.4.0002openalex-snapshot
Health and medical researchers are willing to trade their results for journal impact factors: results from a discrete choice experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002238openalex-snapshot
Relationship between journal impact factor and the thoroughness and helpfulness of peer reviews
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003368openalex-snapshot
Ending publication bias: A values-based approach to surface null and negative results
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003532openalex-snapshot
Most researchers would receive more recognition if assessed by article-level metrics than by journal-level metrics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008565openalex-snapshot
Technical and social issues influencing the adoption of preprints in the life sciences
showing the first 200 of 344
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.