On the public citation graph

Chapter 9. Human Rights Reporting as a Policy Tool: An Examination of the State Department Country Reports

https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512802863-013
0 signed · 40 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2290513openalex-extracted
Resource Windfalls, Political Regimes, and Political Stability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10122-1_6openalex-snapshot
Some Thoughts on the Systematic Measurement of the Abuse of Human Rights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13160-0_9openalex-snapshot
Advancing Human Rights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf02687218openalex-snapshot
The construction of information in planning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0391-yopenalex-snapshot
Respect for Civil Liberties During the Third Wave of Democratization: Presenting a New Dataset
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-010-0183-6openalex-snapshot
Improving the Effectiveness of the International Law of Human Trafficking: A Vision for the Future of the US Trafficking in Persons Reports
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-011-0190-2openalex-snapshot
Torture Approval in Comparative Perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-008-0003-4openalex-snapshot
The Civil Liberty Dataset: Conceptualization and Measurement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102461openalex-snapshot
Working to protect rights: Women's civil liberties in cross-cultural perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.44openalex-snapshot
The Politics of Scrutiny in Human Rights Monitoring: Evidence from Structural Topic Models of US State Department Human Rights Reports
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000070openalex-snapshot
Respect for Human Rights has Improved Over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781403944030_5openalex-snapshot
Actors: States and Intergovernmental Organizations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.60openalex-snapshot
the construction of human rights: accounting for systematic bias in common human rights measures
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01944369808975956openalex-snapshot
Information in Communicative Planning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/03050629408434834openalex-snapshot
Impact of human rights on U.S. foreign assistance to Latin America
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.738863openalex-snapshot
Autocracies, democracies, and the violation of civil liberties
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.877676openalex-snapshot
Comparing Freedom House Democracy Scores to Alternative Indices and Testing for Political Bias: Are US Allies Rated as More Democratic by Freedom House?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14649350020008378openalex-snapshot
Indicators for Sustainable Communities: A Strategy Building on Complexity Theory and Distributed Intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqy052openalex-snapshot
Nudging the Needle: Foreign Lobbies and US Human Rights Ratings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huz008openalex-snapshot
Are UN Investigations into Human Rights Violations a Viable Solution? An Assessment of UN Commissions of Inquiry
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00121openalex-snapshot
Repression of the Human Right to Personal Integrity Revisited: A Global Cross-National Study Covering the Years 1976-1993
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.1990.tb00244.xopenalex-snapshot
Monitoring Human Rights: Problems of Consistency
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102612-133939openalex-snapshot
Field-Based Methods of Research on Human Rights Violations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00538openalex-snapshot
Resource Windfalls, Political Regimes, and Political Stability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1163/15691497-12341343openalex-snapshot
The Country Reports on Human Rights Practices and us Human Rights Policy in a Changing World
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006293442openalex-snapshot
Racing to the Bottom or Climbing to the Top? Economic Globalization and Collective Labor Rights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0022002791035001007openalex-snapshot
Conditions Affecting the Use of Political Repression
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512451530openalex-snapshot
What One Sees and How One Files Seeing: Human Rights Reporting, Representation and Action 1
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/106591290205500105openalex-snapshot
Constitutional Provisions for Individual Human Rights (1977-1996): Are They More Than Mere "Window Dressing?"
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207075148openalex-snapshot
Making Plans: Representation and Intention
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12794/metadc2180openalex-snapshot
Progress or Decline: International Political Economy and Basic Human Rights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2001.0041openalex-snapshot
How are These Pictures Different? A Quantitative Comparison of the US State Department and Amnesty International Human Rights Reports, 1976-1995
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2013.0046openalex-snapshot
Information Effects and Human Rights Data: Is the Good News about Increased Human Rights Information Bad News for Human Rights Measures?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2016.0057openalex-snapshot
United States Military Assistance and Human Rights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138935openalex-snapshot
Human Rights Texts: Converting Human Rights Primary Source Documents into Data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2015.368openalex-snapshot
Beyond diplomacy: can dialogue overtake history,ideological, and power distortions? The case of human rights conversations between the U.S. and Vietnam
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/2082712openalex-snapshot
Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/2669278openalex-snapshot
Ideas, Bureaucratic Politics, and the Crafting of Foreign Policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2979/gls.2009.16.2.437openalex-snapshot
Civil Rights in International Law: Compliance with Aspects of the “International Bill of Rights”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7202/1034254aropenalex-snapshot
Production de connaissances et processus de planification
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.