Reference health
What's the Right Thing to Do? Increasing Pro-Sociality with Simple Moral Nudges
99/99 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
4 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 99 checked references that resolve
resolves10.3386/w12338
Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence From a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment
resolves10.1257/aer.99.1.544
Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially
resolves10.1016/0162-3095(92)90032-y
Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups
resolves10.1038/nature02978
Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem
resolves10.1073/pnas.0504902103
Stabilizing the Earth’s climate is not a losing game: Supporting evidence from public goods experiments
resolves10.1017/S1930297500004800
Partner selection supported by opaque reputation promotes cooperative behavior
resolves10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00051.x
THE EFFECT OF REWARDS AND SANCTIONS IN PROVISION OF PUBLIC GOODS
resolves10.1002/nvsm.385
Gendered giving: the influence of social norms on the donation behavior of men and women
resolves10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.02.003
Social anxiety and alcohol problems: The roles of perceived descriptive and injunctive peer norms
resolves10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60330-5
A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior
resolves10.3386/w17189
Using Non-Pecuniary Strategies to Influence Behavior: Evidence from a Large Scale Field Experiment
resolves10.1037/a0034837
Experimental effects of injunctive norms on simulated risky driving among teenage males.
resolves10.1080/2153599x.2013.775664
Religious motivations for cooperation: an experimental investigation using explicit primes
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.05.002
“Do the right thing:” The effects of moral suasion on cooperation
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2965067
Do the Right Thing: Preferences for Moral Behavior, Rather Than Equity or Efficiency per se, Drive Human Prosociality
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2018.06.005
Doing good vs. avoiding bad in prosocial choice: A refined test and extension of the morality preference hypothesis
resolves10.1257/aer.104.10.3003
The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Behavioral Interventions: Experimental Evidence from Energy Conservation
resolves10.1257/aer.101.3.318
The Persistence of Treatment Effects with Norm-Based Policy Instruments: Evidence from a Randomized Environmental Policy Experiment
resolves10.1177/0146167211400208
Striving for the Moral Self: The Effects of Recalling Past Moral Actions on Future Moral Behavior
resolves10.1257/aer.96.3.669
A Change Would Do You Good .... An Experimental Study on How to Overcome Coordination Failure in Organizations
resolves10.1006/obhd.2000.2882
Increasing Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemmas by Establishing a Precedent of Efficiency in Coordination Games
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2015.2168
Habits of Virtue: Creating Norms of Cooperation and Defection in the Laboratory
resolves10.1038/srep06790
Heuristics guide the implementation of social preferences in one-shot Prisoner's Dilemma experiments
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0102881
Benevolent Characteristics Promote Cooperative Behaviour among Humans
resolves10.1038/ncomms5939
Humans display a ‘cooperative phenotype’ that is domain general and temporally stable
resolves10.1007/s10683-007-9192-y
Do people behave in experiments as in the field?—evidence from donations
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.013
A field study on cooperativeness and impatience in the Tragedy of the Commons
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2017.2908
On the External Validity of Social Preference Games: A Systematic Lab-Field Study
resolves10.1111/j.1548-1433.2008.00024.x
Collective Action in Action: Prosocial Behavior in and out of the Laboratory
resolves10.1037/xge0000154
Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men.
resolves10.1007/s10683-011-9273-9
The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market
resolves10.1093/pan/mpr057
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
resolves10.1002/bdm.1753
Data Collection in a Flat World: The Strengths and Weaknesses of Mechanical Turk Samples
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.014
No margin, no mission? A field experiment on incentives for public service delivery
resolves10.1073/pnas.1301210110
Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment
resolves10.1007/s10683-007-9190-0
Matching and challenge gifts to charity: evidence from laboratory and natural field experiments
resolves10.1162/jeea.2007.5.6.1203
Do Subsidies Increase Charitable Giving in the Long Run? Matching Donations in a Field Experiment
resolves10.1007/s10683-011-9312-6
Do watching eyes affect charitable giving? Evidence from a field experiment
resolves10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.10.006
Effects of eye images on everyday cooperative behavior: a field experiment
resolves10.1257/0002828043052187
Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior: Testing “Conditional Cooperation” in a Field Experiment
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2017.02.029
Push, don’t nudge: Behavioral spillovers and policy instruments
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00707.x
Putting Behavioral Economics to Work: Testing for Gift Exchange in Labor Markets Using Field Experiments
resolves10.3386/w17648
Avoiding The Ask: A Field Experiment on Altruism, Empathy, and Charitable Giving
resolves10.3386/w11611
Toward an Understanding of the Economics of Charity: Evidence from a Field Experiment
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.022
Gender differences in altruism on Mechanical Turk: Expectations and actual behaviour
resolves10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.01.002
Stake size effects in ultimatum game and dictator game offers: A meta-analysis
resolves10.3982/ecta10637
Homo Moralis--Preference Evolution Under Incomplete Information and Assortative Matching
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1310598
Identifying Social Norms using Coordination Games: Why Does Dictator Game Sharing Vary?
resolves10.1017/S1930297500004356
The power of moral words: Loaded language generates framing effects in the extreme dictator game
The 4 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedExtending the cooperative phenotype: Assessing the stability of cooperation across countries
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedref103
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3064004"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3064004/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3064004)