On the public citation graph
Strong subsite‐specific variation in detecting advanced adenomas by fecal immunochemical testing for hemoglobin
0 signed · 78 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1773openalex-snapshot
Low-Dose Aspirin Use and Performance of Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Tests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.8266openalex-snapshot
Effect of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24458openalex-snapshot
False negative fecal occult blood tests due to delayed sample return in colorectal cancer screening
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29148openalex-snapshot
Which adenomas are detected by fecal occult blood testing? A state‐wide analysis from B avaria, G ermany
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2009.04.025openalex-snapshot
Combination of Sigmoidoscopy and a Fecal Immunochemical Test to Detect Proximal Colon Neoplasia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2013.01.013openalex-snapshot
Association Between Early Stage Colon Neoplasms and False-negative Results From the Fecal Immunochemical Test
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.02.021openalex-snapshot
Diagnostic Accuracy of a Qualitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Varies With Location of Neoplasia But Not Number of Specimens
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.023openalex-snapshot
Superior diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin in a head-to-head comparison with guaiac based faecal occult blood test among 2235 participants of screening colonoscopy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.056openalex-snapshot
A Comparison of the Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Test and Total Colonoscopy in the Asymptomatic Population
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60551-xopenalex-snapshot
Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2010.179openalex-snapshot
Comparison of Guaiac-Based and Quantitative Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing in a Population at Average Risk Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Screening
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2012.249openalex-snapshot
Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing Is Equally Sensitive for Proximal and Distal Advanced Neoplasia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2012.380openalex-snapshot
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy vs. Sigmoidoscopy and Alternative Strategies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.492openalex-snapshot
Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.160openalex-snapshot
Sensitivity of immunochemical faecal occult blood testing for detecting left- vs right-sided colorectal neoplasia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.012openalex-snapshot
Trends in Adenoma Detection Rates During the First 10 Years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-995618openalex-snapshot
Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1114635openalex-snapshot
Colorectal-Cancer Incidence and Mortality with Screening Flexible Sigmoidoscopy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1311194openalex-snapshot
Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal-Cancer Screening
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr284openalex-snapshot
Once-Only Sigmoidoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Follow-up Findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial--SCORE
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00231.xopenalex-snapshot
Performance Characteristics and Evaluation of an Automated-Developed and Quantitative, Immunochemical, Fecal Occult Blood Screening Test
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2467openalex-snapshot
Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2008.156448openalex-snapshot
Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2009.177089openalex-snapshot
Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308074openalex-snapshot
Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-3051openalex-snapshot
Head-to-Head Comparison and Evaluation of 92 Plasma Protein Biomarkers for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer in a True Screening Setting
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.capr-11-0076openalex-snapshot
Test Performance of Immunologic Fecal Occult Blood Testing and Sigmoidoscopy Compared with Primary Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Advanced Adenomas
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563213514392openalex-snapshot
A standard for Faecal Immunochemical TesTs for Haemoglobin Evaluation Reporting (FITTER)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.32614/r.manualsopenalex-snapshot
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00210openalex-snapshot
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-150-3-200902030-00005openalex-snapshot
Comparative Evaluation of Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Adenoma Detection
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4574750openalex-extracted
Left-to-Right Shift of Colon Cancer Over 25 Years:A Population Study Encompassing Programmatic Screening
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.4417openalex-snapshot
Screening for Colorectal Cancer
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70120openalex-snapshot
Anatomical Distribution of Polyps Is Different for Men and Women With Positive Stool Tests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0404-xopenalex-snapshot
Flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: implications of different colonoscopy referral strategies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-020-00770-6openalex-snapshot
Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Performance Benchmarks Lead to High Expected Efficacy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-021-01125-3openalex-snapshot
Calibrating Natural History of Cancer Models in the Presence of Data Incompatibility: Problems and Solutions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2017.04.008openalex-snapshot
Distribution of colorectal polyps: Implications for screening
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2022.102229openalex-snapshot
American Indian/Alaska Native and black colon cancer patients have poorer cause-specific survival based on disease stage and anatomic site of diagnosis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.01.025openalex-snapshot
Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Detection Differs According to Stage and Location
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2018.10.011openalex-snapshot
Colorectal cancer screening: The surgery rates they are a-changing. A nationwide study on surgical resections in Italy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2026.03.019openalex-snapshot
Mid-term effects of faecal immunochemical test screening on colorectal cancer incidence by tumour site
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2026.08.037openalex-snapshot
The influence of tumor side, sex, and screening on colon cancer stage and survival: a 25-year population-based study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.08.043openalex-snapshot
Anatomical location of colorectal neoplasia in patients with positive stool test (multitarget stool deoxyribonucleic acid or fecal immunochemical test) results: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.10.025openalex-snapshot
Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2017.37openalex-snapshot
Selecting a Cut-off for Colorectal Cancer Screening With a Fecal Immunochemical Test
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41395-018-0212-7openalex-snapshot
Participant-Related Risk Factors for False-Positive and False-Negative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51377-0openalex-snapshot
Adenoma location, size, and morphology are risk factors for FOBT false-negative results in inpatients with advanced colorectal adenoma
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.023openalex-snapshot
Effect of Sex, Age, and Positivity Threshold on Fecal Immunochemical Test Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000001346openalex-snapshot
Divergent detection rates of fecal immunochemical test and questionnaire-based risk assessment for detecting proximal and distal advanced colorectal adenomas
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000000795openalex-snapshot
Diagnostic Performance of One-off Flexible Sigmoidoscopy with Fecal Immunochemical Testing in a Large Screening Population
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13954openalex-snapshot
Antithrombotic drug use does not affect the fecal immunochemical test PPV for colorectal cancer, but warfarin may have an impact in a Japanese cohort
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001233openalex-snapshot
Interval colorectal cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test in the New Zealand Bowel Screening Pilot
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-1537openalex-snapshot
Black and White Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Screening Outcomes: A Narrative Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x18806497openalex-snapshot
Modeling in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Assessing External and Predictive Validity of MISCAN-Colon Microsimulation Model Using NORCCAP Trial Results
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0969141320918613openalex-snapshot
Interval colorectal cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test in a 13-year screening programme
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/2050640618784053openalex-snapshot
Fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin in combination with fecal transferrin in colorectal cancer screening
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/2050640618792819openalex-snapshot
UEG Week 2018 Poster Presentations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/2381468320984974openalex-snapshot
Development and Validation of Three Regional Microsimulation Models for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits in Europe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4826-3openalex-snapshot
Clinical trial protocol of the ASTER trial: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial evaluating the use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for enhanced early detection of colorectal neoplasms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000465openalex-snapshot
Stage-Specific Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Detecting Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003950openalex-snapshot
Risk Factors of Proximal and Distal Advanced Colorectal Conventional and Serrated Neoplasia in Adults Younger Than 50 Years of Age
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000004141openalex-snapshot
Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality by Age Group, Colon Location, and Histology in Canada
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000277openalex-snapshot
Correlation of Fecal Immunochemical Testing Levels With Pathology Results in a National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2147/clep.s213677openalex-snapshot
Diagnostic Accuracy Of Fecal Occult Blood Tests For Detecting Proximal Versus Distal Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.20.25416openalex-snapshot
PPV and Detection Rate of mt-sDNA Testing, FIT, and CT Colonography for Advanced Neoplasia: A Hierarchic Bayesian Meta-Analysis of the Noninvasive Colorectal Screening Tests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.33160/yam.2020.02.009openalex-snapshot
Characteristics of Advanced Colorectal Cancer Detected by Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening in Participants with a Negative Result the Previous Year
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092610openalex-snapshot
Triage May Improve Selection to Colonoscopy and Reduce the Number of Unnecessary Colonoscopies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112718openalex-snapshot
Tracking the Antibody Immunome in Sporadic Colorectal Cancer by Using Antigen Self-Assembled Protein Arrays
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13143574openalex-snapshot
Consistent Major Differences in Sex- and Age-Specific Diagnostic Performance among Nine Faecal Immunochemical Tests Used for Colorectal Cancer Screening
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010096openalex-snapshot
Stool- and Blood-Associated Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers: A Systematic Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12041013openalex-snapshot
Faecal Immunochemical Test Impact on Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Detected in Symptomatic Patients
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/genes12101539openalex-snapshot
RETRACTED: Using Comorbidity Pattern Analysis to Detect Reliable Methylated Genes in Colorectal Cancer Verified by Stool DNA Test
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3862/jcoloproctology.74.6openalex-snapshot
Clinicopathological Characteristics of Colorectal Adenomas and Cancers Detected by FIT-positive Colonoscopy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0244openalex-snapshot
Influence of Varying Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Positivity Thresholds on Colorectal Cancer Detection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0855openalex-snapshot
Divergent Long-Term Detection Rates of Proximal and Distal Advanced Neoplasia in Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening Programs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7326/m18-2390openalex-snapshot
Performance Characteristics of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenomatous Polyps
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.