On the public citation graph
Influence of Varying Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Positivity Thresholds on Colorectal Cancer Detection
0 signed · 114 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1362openalex-snapshot
Sex-Specific Prevalence of Adenomas, Advanced Adenomas, and Colorectal Cancer in Individuals Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.3332openalex-snapshot
Screening for Colorectal Cancer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.5989openalex-snapshot
Screening for Colorectal Cancer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.6828openalex-snapshot
Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30629openalex-snapshot
Strong subsite‐specific variation in detecting advanced adenomas by fecal immunochemical testing for hemoglobin
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4169-3openalex-snapshot
Does Low Threshold Value Use Improve Proximal Neoplasia Detection by Fecal Immunochemical Test?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1375-0openalex-snapshot
Effect of Verification Bias on the Sensitivity of Fecal Occult Blood Testing: a Meta-Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8openalex-snapshot
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2009.01.017openalex-snapshot
Investigation of Colonic and Whole-Gut Transit With Wireless Motility Capsule and Radiopaque Markers in Constipation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2012.03.015openalex-snapshot
Positivity rates and performances of immunochemical faecal occult blood tests at different cut-off levels within a colorectal cancer screening programme
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2016.12.020openalex-snapshot
The fecal immunochemical test has high accuracy for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia before age 50
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.025openalex-snapshot
Recommendations on fecal immunochemical testing to screen for colorectal neoplasia: a consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2010.301openalex-snapshot
Sex Differences in Performance of Fecal Occult Blood Testing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2012.249openalex-snapshot
Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing Is Equally Sensitive for Proximal and Distal Advanced Neoplasia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41395-018-0023-xopenalex-snapshot
Patterns and predictors of repeat fecal immunochemical and occult blood test screening in four large health care systems in the United States
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.08.043openalex-snapshot
Difference in Performance of Fecal Immunochemical Tests With the Same Hemoglobin Cutoff Concentration in a Nationwide Colorectal Cancer Screening Program
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.053openalex-snapshot
Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.022openalex-snapshot
Real-Time Monitoring of Results During First Year of Dutch Colorectal Cancer Screening Program and Optimization by Altering Fecal Immunochemical Test Cut-Off Levels
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.018openalex-snapshot
Direct Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of 9 Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198809013190901openalex-snapshot
Genetic Alterations during Colorectal-Tumor Development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1300720openalex-snapshot
Long-Term Mortality after Screening for Colorectal Cancer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1311194openalex-snapshot
Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal-Cancer Screening
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxr007openalex-snapshot
Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening in Integrated Health Care Systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djs190openalex-snapshot
A Proposal to Standardize Reporting Units for Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Hemoglobin
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000004414openalex-snapshot
Fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer from a prospective cohort with 513,283 individuals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01875.xopenalex-snapshot
Cochrane Systematic Review of Colorectal Cancer Screening Using the Fecal Occult Blood Test (Hemoccult): An Update
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2007.122739openalex-snapshot
Risk of progression of advanced adenomas to colorectal cancer by age and sex: estimates based on 840 149 screening colonoscopies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300535openalex-snapshot
Interval cancers in a FOBT-based colorectal cancer population screening programme: implications for stage, gender and tumour site
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0470openalex-snapshot
Time to Colonoscopy after Positive Fecal Blood Test in Four U.S. Health Care Systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640616659998openalex-snapshot
Fecal immunochemical test‐based colorectal cancer screening: The gender dilemma
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-014-0217-7openalex-snapshot
Prospective cross-sectional study on faecal immunochemical tests: sex specific cut-off values to obtain equal sensitivity for colorectal cancer?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3555-3openalex-snapshot
Population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes using a faecal immunochemical test: should faecal haemoglobin cut-offs differ by age and sex?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079292openalex-snapshot
Validity of Fecal Occult Blood Test in the National Cancer Screening Program, Korea
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-0115openalex-snapshot
Faecal haemoglobin concentrations vary with sex and age, but data are not transferable across geography for colorectal cancer screening
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2011.815openalex-snapshot
Faecal haemoglobin concentrations by gender and age: implications for population-based screening for colorectal cancer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.82.5.703openalex-snapshot
Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2147/clep.s155548openalex-snapshot
Variation of diagnostic performance of fecal immunochemical testing for hemoglobin by sex and age: results from a large screening cohort
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.22034/apjcp.2017.18.2.405openalex-snapshot
The Optimal Cut-Off Level of The Fecal Immunochemical Test For Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Country with Limited Colonoscopy Resources: A Multi-Center Study from Thailand
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2217/cer.15.39openalex-snapshot
Observational methods to assess the effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing right colon cancer mortality risk: SCOLAR
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2016.06.160060openalex-snapshot
Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) for Colon Cancer Screening: Variable Performance with Ambient Temperature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i38.5397openalex-snapshot
Similar fecal immunochemical test results in screening and referral colorectal cancer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.1038openalex-snapshot
Fecal immunochemical test accuracy in average-risk colorectal cancer screening
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5167openalex-snapshot
Sex- and gender-specific disparities in colorectal cancer risk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i20.3632openalex-snapshot
Colorectal cancer population screening programs worldwide in 2016: An update
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-146-4-200702200-00003openalex-snapshot
A Quantitative Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Neoplasia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7326/m13-1484openalex-snapshot
Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7326/m15-0983openalex-snapshot
Fecal Immunochemical Test Program Performance Over 4 Rounds of Annual Screening
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7326/m17-1441openalex-snapshot
Long-Term Effectiveness of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Women and Men
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7812/tpp/12-031openalex-snapshot
Sociodemographic Characteristics of Members of a Large, Integrated Health Care System: Comparison with US Census Bureau Data
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4574750openalex-extracted
Left-to-Right Shift of Colon Cancer Over 25 Years:A Population Study Encompassing Programmatic Screening
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.4417openalex-snapshot
Screening for Colorectal Cancer
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.23671openalex-snapshot
Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening and Risk of Colorectal Cancer Death
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/aid2.13169openalex-snapshot
Relatively low risk and nonaggressive stage of colorectal cancer in individuals with negative baseline fecal immunochemical test results: A cohort study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32747openalex-snapshot
Circulating lncRNA SNHG11 as a novel biomarker for early diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57273-0_6openalex-snapshot
Information on Colon Polyps in Terms of Gastroenterology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-026-02221-5openalex-snapshot
Disparities in colonoscopy adherence and neoplasia detection after positive fecal immunochemical test: a retrospective matched cohort study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08695-0openalex-snapshot
Does Colonoscopy as a First Screening Test Still Make Sense?—Counterpoint
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2023.107353openalex-snapshot
Hub-and-Spoke centralized intervention to optimize colorectal cancer screening and follow-up: A pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial protocol
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.04.077openalex-snapshot
Lower Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Test Cut-Off Values Improve Detection of Colorectal Cancer in System-Level Screens
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.021openalex-snapshot
Incidence of Interval Colorectal Cancer After Negative Results From First-Round Fecal Immunochemical Screening Tests, by Cutoff Value and Participant Sex and Age
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.008openalex-snapshot
Do We Need a New Paradigm for Assessing the Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.09.036openalex-snapshot
A Predictive Model Based on Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Can Stratify the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in an Organized Screening Program
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2026.08.037openalex-snapshot
The influence of tumor side, sex, and screening on colon cancer stage and survival: a 25-year population-based study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.04.022openalex-snapshot
Optimizing the Finnish colorectal cancer population screening program with decision programming
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100288openalex-snapshot
A user-friendly objective prediction model in predicting colorectal cancer based on 234 044 Asian adults in a prospective cohort
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.038openalex-snapshot
Varying fecal immunochemical test screening cutoffs by age and gender: a way to increase detection rates and reduce the number of colonoscopies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.06.015openalex-snapshot
Development of an algorithm combining blood-based biomarkers, fecal immunochemical test, and age for population-based colorectal cancer screening
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.08.011openalex-snapshot
Performance comparison of quantitative and qualitative fecal immunochemical tests in community-based colorectal cancer screening
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2020.02.002openalex-snapshot
What Is Organized Screening and What Is Its Value?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01694-2openalex-snapshot
Optimizing the colorectal cancer screening programme using faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in Flanders, Belgium from the “interval cancer” perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-020-00368-3openalex-snapshot
A risk-stratified approach to colorectal cancer prevention and diagnosis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.023openalex-snapshot
Effect of Sex, Age, and Positivity Threshold on Fecal Immunochemical Test Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0284186x.2019.1588475openalex-snapshot
Continuous development of colorectal cancer screening programs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwag008openalex-snapshot
Should we screen for colorectal cancer with biennial FIT beginning at age 45 in Canada?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae022openalex-snapshot
Maximizing scarce colonoscopy resources: the crucial role of stool-based tests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf171openalex-snapshot
Noninvasive colorectal cancer screening: simple may be optimal
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18314openalex-snapshot
Performance of Faecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening at Varying Positivity Thresholds
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15860openalex-snapshot
Cost‐effectiveness of risk‐tailored screening strategy for colorectal cancer: A systematic review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16182openalex-snapshot
Development and Validation of eRADAR: A Tool Using EHR Data to Detect Unrecognized Dementia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13810openalex-snapshot
Colonoscopy findings after increasing two‐stool faecal immunochemical test (FIT) cut‐off: Cross‐sectional analysis of the SCREESCO randomized trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1855openalex-snapshot
Screening and prevention of colorectal cancer
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001233openalex-snapshot
Interval colorectal cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test in the New Zealand Bowel Screening Pilot
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059940openalex-snapshot
A cohort study of duplicate faecal immunochemical testing in patients at risk of colorectal cancer from North-West England
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.capr-20-0620openalex-snapshot
The Costs and Benefits of Risk Stratification for Colorectal Cancer Screening Based On Phenotypic and Genetic Risk: A Health Economic Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0969141320921427openalex-snapshot
The effect of using fecal testing after a negative sigmoidoscopy on the risk of death from colorectal cancer
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/09691413221094919openalex-snapshot
One or two faecal immunochemical tests in an organised population-based colorectal cancer screening programme in Murcia (Spain)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10732748231222109openalex-snapshot
Blood Biomarkers Panels for Screening of Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma on a Machine Learning-Assisted Detection Platform
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/20101058261451666openalex-snapshot
A narrative review of colorectal cancer screening – current screening modalities, barriers and facilitators, strategies, future challenges, and the application in the local context
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-04954-8openalex-snapshot
One- versus two-sample fecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of participation, diagnostic performance, and cost-effectiveness
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01750-3openalex-snapshot
The impact of hypothetical PErsonalised Risk Information on informed choice and intention to undergo Colorectal Cancer screening colonoscopy in Scotland (PERICCS)—a randomised controlled trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000412openalex-snapshot
Overestimated Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Screening Cohorts With Registry-Based Follow-up
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000465openalex-snapshot
Stage-Specific Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Detecting Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0583openalex-snapshot
Strategies to minimise the current disadvantages experienced by women in faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-0236openalex-snapshot
A simplified multitarget stool test for colorectal cancer and advanced precancerous lesion detection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2022-9-3-11openalex-snapshot
Fecal occult blood testing in colorectal cancer screening programs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1791919openalex-snapshot
Fecal hemoglobin concentration as a risk stratification tool for advanced colorectal neoplasm in a community-based screening program
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13142332openalex-snapshot
Faecal Immunochemical Testing to Detect Colorectal Cancer in Symptomatic Patients: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.33920/med-15-2401-04openalex-snapshot
Questionnaire as a stratification method in organizing colorectal cancer screening
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2023.105.6.333openalex-snapshot
National cancer screening program for colorectal cancer in Korea
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13115196openalex-snapshot
Additional file 1 of The impact of hypothetical PErsonalised Risk Information on informed choice and intention to undergo Colorectal Cancer screening colonoscopy in Scotland (PERICCS)—a randomised controlled trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13115199openalex-snapshot
Additional file 2 of The impact of hypothetical PErsonalised Risk Information on informed choice and intention to undergo Colorectal Cancer screening colonoscopy in Scotland (PERICCS)—a randomised controlled trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13115202openalex-snapshot
Additional file 3 of The impact of hypothetical PErsonalised Risk Information on informed choice and intention to undergo Colorectal Cancer screening colonoscopy in Scotland (PERICCS)—a randomised controlled trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13115205openalex-snapshot
Additional file 4 of The impact of hypothetical PErsonalised Risk Information on informed choice and intention to undergo Colorectal Cancer screening colonoscopy in Scotland (PERICCS)—a randomised controlled trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13115208openalex-snapshot
Additional file 5 of The impact of hypothetical PErsonalised Risk Information on informed choice and intention to undergo Colorectal Cancer screening colonoscopy in Scotland (PERICCS)—a randomised controlled trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13115211openalex-snapshot
Additional file 6 of The impact of hypothetical PErsonalised Risk Information on informed choice and intention to undergo Colorectal Cancer screening colonoscopy in Scotland (PERICCS)—a randomised controlled trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13115214openalex-snapshot
Additional file 7 of The impact of hypothetical PErsonalised Risk Information on informed choice and intention to undergo Colorectal Cancer screening colonoscopy in Scotland (PERICCS)—a randomised controlled trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.61568/kbm.2021.002openalex-snapshot
Quantitative determination of hemoglobin in stool - preanalytical and analytical aspects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7326/l19-0094openalex-snapshot
Influence of Varying Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Positivity Thresholds on Colorectal Cancer Detection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7326/m18-2257openalex-snapshot
Intelligent Use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test in Population-Based Screening
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7326/m18-2390openalex-snapshot
Performance Characteristics of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenomatous Polyps
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7326/m18-2444openalex-snapshot
In Screening for Colorectal Cancer, Is the FIT Right for the Right Side of the Colon?
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.