On the public citation graph
Predictors of the need for supportive femoral approach during transvenous extraction of pacemaker and defibrillator leads in Japanese patients
0 signed · 24 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27003openalex-snapshot
A randomized comparison of modified subcutaneous “Z”‐stitch versus manual compression to achieve hemostasis after large caliber femoral venous sheath removal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.1050openalex-snapshot
“Spaghetti twisting” technique: a novel method of catching pacemaker leads using a needle's eye snare
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12395openalex-snapshot
Predictors of the need for supportive femoral approach during transvenous extraction of pacemaker and defibrillator leads in Japanese patients
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.05.020openalex-snapshot
Transvenous Lead Extraction: Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus on Facilities, Training, Indications, and Patient Management
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.01.029openalex-snapshot
Predictors and outcomes of lead extraction requiring a bailout femoral approach: Data from 2 high-volume centers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.09.001openalex-snapshot
2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.05.022openalex-snapshot
Simultaneous lead traction from above and below: A novel technique to reduce the risk of superior vena cava injury during transvenous lead extraction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx080openalex-snapshot
The European Lead Extraction ConTRolled (ELECTRa) study: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Registry of Transvenous Lead Extraction Outcomes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eur338openalex-snapshot
Pathways for training and accreditation for transvenous lead extraction: a European Heart Rhythm Association position paper
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu004openalex-snapshot
Safety and efficacy of internal transjugular approach for transvenous extraction of implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu124openalex-snapshot
Prevalence of venous occlusion in patients referred for lead extraction: implications for tool selection
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euy050openalex-snapshot
2018 EHRA expert consensus statement on lead extraction: recommendations on definitions, endpoints, research trial design, and data collection requirements for clinical scientific studies and registries: endorsed by APHRS/HRS/LAHRS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.13791openalex-snapshot
Prolonged lead dwell time and lead burden predict bailout transfemoral lead extraction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.116.004768openalex-snapshot
Incidence and Predictors of Perioperative Complications With Transvenous Lead Extractions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.115.001878openalex-snapshot
Venous Stenosis After Transvenous Lead Placement: A Study of Outcomes and Risk Factors in 212 Consecutive Patients
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181aa084copenalex-snapshot
The Efficacy of an Intraoperative Cell Saver During Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4017056openalex-extracted
Predictors and Outcomes of Transvenous Lead Extraction Requiring Femoral Bailout
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70286openalex-snapshot
Annual Trends and Regional Disparities in Transvenous Lead Extractions in Japan: Insights From the Nationwide Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases‐Diagnostic Procedure Combination Data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2023.05.001openalex-snapshot
Transvenous Lead Extraction: Outcomes From a Single Centre Providing a National Service for New Zealand
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.11.001openalex-snapshot
A “hands-on” approach to femoral lead extraction: Indications, tools, and techniques
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16398openalex-snapshot
Removal of leads broken during extraction: A comparison of different approaches and tools
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1253/circj.cj-23-0103openalex-snapshot
Regional Disparities in Transvenous Lead Extraction for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Japan ― A Descriptive Study Using the National Database Open Data ―
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22541/au.165156306.64687911/v1openalex-snapshot
Predictors and Outcomes of Transvenous Lead Extraction Requiring Femoral Bailout
showing the first 7 of 8 · page through all 8
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.