On the public citation graph
An Argumentation Framework for Merging Conflicting Knowledge Bases: The Prioritized Case
0 signed · 34 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_45openalex-snapshot
An Argumentation Framework for Merging Conflicting Knowledge Bases: The Prioritized Case
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45757-7_3openalex-snapshot
An Argumentation Framework for Merging Conflicting Knowledge Bases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48159-1_16openalex-snapshot
A Practical Approach to Fusing Prioritized Knowledge Bases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1737-3openalex-snapshot
Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1737-3_5openalex-snapshot
Possibilistic Logic: Complexity and Algorithms
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00154005openalex-snapshot
On inference from inconsistent premisses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-xopenalex-snapshot
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(95)00019-4openalex-snapshot
Integration of weighted knowledge bases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(78)90029-5openalex-snapshot
Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0114(99)80004-9openalex-snapshot
Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0888-613x(03)00018-5openalex-snapshot
Fusion of possibilistic knowledge bases from a postulate point of view
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014446411602openalex-snapshot
Possibilistic Merging and Distance-Based Fusion of Propositional Information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014490210693openalex-snapshot
A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021603608656openalex-snapshot
Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.1997.10510900openalex-snapshot
Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198537472.003.0009openalex-snapshot
Possibilistic Logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218843098000040openalex-snapshot
MERGING DATABASES UNDER CONSTRAINTS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/153850.153857openalex-snapshot
On the semantics of theory change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1207.4130openalex-snapshot
Using arguments for making decisions: A possibilistic logic approach
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32597-7_1openalex-snapshot
Consistent Query Answering Using Relational Databases through Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2105-0_16openalex-snapshot
Dempster–Shafer Theory Based Consensus Building in Collaborative Conceptual Modeling
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-007-9025-6openalex-snapshot
Agents that argue and explain classifications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-006-9043-0openalex-snapshot
A split-combination approach to merging knowledge bases in possibilistic logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.02.003openalex-snapshot
On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2007.07.004openalex-snapshot
Formalizing argumentative reasoning in a possibilistic logic programming setting with fuzzy unification
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.07.010openalex-snapshot
Relational databases as a massive information source for defeasible argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/cts.2009.5067509openalex-snapshot
Integration of the dynamic, mutual evaluating and role-based iterated revision belief into collaborative conceptual modeling
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-231openalex-snapshot
Two-Agent Conflict Resolution with Assumption-Based Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/aac-170017openalex-snapshot
Defeasible argumentation over relational databases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/his-2009-0098openalex-snapshot
Portfolio construction using argumentation and hybrid evolutionary forecasting algorithms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1203.3508openalex-snapshot
Merging Knowledge Bases in Possibilistic Logic by Lexicographic Aggregation
showing the first 13 of 14 · page through all 14
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.