On the public citation graph

Conditionals and monotonic belief revisions: the success postulate

https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00370165
0 signed · 15 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00370643openalex-snapshot
Variations on the Ramsey test: More triviality results
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00401549openalex-snapshot
The G�rdenfors impossibility theorem in non-monotonic contexts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00869346openalex-snapshot
Conditionals and theory change: Revisions, expansions, and additions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2185133openalex-snapshot
Belief Revisions and the Ramsey Test for Conditionals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2274239openalex-snapshot
On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2672-4_36openalex-snapshot
Generation and Maintenance of Computational Viewpoints in Student Models
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0456-4_1openalex-snapshot
Conditional Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf00401549openalex-snapshot
The G�rdenfors impossibility theorem in non-monotonic contexts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf00413768openalex-snapshot
Two notions of epistemic validity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s001990100194openalex-snapshot
Minimal belief change, Pareto-optimality and logical consequence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-017-9968-1openalex-snapshot
Two Approaches to Belief Revision
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-025-02459-wopenalex-snapshot
From belief change to modality: Epistemic semantics for modal and conditional logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1755020308090023openalex-snapshot
BELIEF-REVISION, THE RAMSEY TEST, MONOTONICITY, AND THE SO-CALLED IMPOSSIBILITY RESULTS
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005162303126openalex-snapshot
Minimal Belief Change and the Pareto Principle
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.1993.10510809openalex-snapshot
Observations on validity and conditionals in belief revision systems
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.