On the public citation graph

An argumentation framework in default logic

https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01531263
0 signed · 54 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119375500.ch1openalex-snapshot
The Doctoral Dissertation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-50701-9_19openalex-snapshot
Hierarchic autoepistemic theories for nonmonotonic reasoning: Preliminary report
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2699-8_9openalex-snapshot
Defeasible Reasoning: A Philosophical Analysis in Prolog
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8484-4_5openalex-snapshot
Hierarchies of Regulations and their Logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(80)90014-4openalex-snapshot
A logic for default reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(88)90077-xopenalex-snapshot
A logical framework for default reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(88)90079-3openalex-snapshot
An approach to default reasoning based on a first-order conditional logic: Revised report
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(92)90069-aopenalex-snapshot
A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/112646.112666openalex-snapshot
A tool in modelling disagreement in law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/41735.41743openalex-snapshot
A case-based system for trade secrets law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1104_4openalex-snapshot
Defeasible Reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2218530openalex-snapshot
Hypothetical Reasoning.

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/11752912_49openalex-snapshot
Combining Credibility in a Source Sensitive Argumentation System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48317-9_15openalex-snapshot
A System for Defeasible Argumentation, with Defeasible Priorities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49426-x_2openalex-snapshot
A Review of Uncertainty Handling Formalisms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61313-7_97openalex-snapshot
A system for defeasible argumentation, with defeasible priorities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5643-5_4openalex-snapshot
The Role of Deontic Logic in the Specification of Information Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35254-6_18openalex-snapshot
Ergo: A Quest for Declarativity in Logic Programming
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74209-5_10openalex-snapshot
Multi-paradigm Logic Programming in the $$\mathcal{E}$$rgoAI System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40581-0_21openalex-snapshot
Argumentation Framework Based on Evidence Theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02846-5_35openalex-snapshot
Logic Programming with Defaults and Argumentation Theories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29414-3_14openalex-snapshot
Some Reflections on Two Current Trends in Formal Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_4openalex-snapshot
A Conditional Logic-Based Argumentation Framework
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0456-4_3openalex-snapshot
Logics for Defeasible Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1739-7_2openalex-snapshot
Paraconsistent Logics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1739-7_3openalex-snapshot
Modal Logics for Representing Incoherent Knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf00370670openalex-snapshot
Two approaches to the formalisation of defeasible deontic reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0035614openalex-snapshot
Information fusion in logic: A brief overview
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-015-9475-5openalex-snapshot
Preferences in artificial intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2019.02.019openalex-snapshot
Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-023x(99)00030-0openalex-snapshot
Ramification analysis using causal mapping
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511802034openalex-snapshot
Argumentation Schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888900002046openalex-snapshot
Reasoning with inconsistency in structured text
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004999920152openalex-snapshot
Is Default Logic a Reinvention of Inductive-Statistical Reasoning?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.1997.10510900openalex-snapshot
Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2014.1002536openalex-snapshot
Sequent-based logical argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/infocom.2008.221openalex-snapshot
Capacity of Hybrid Cellular-Ad Hoc Data Networks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/iri.2010.5558935openalex-snapshot
MUS-based generation of arguments and counter-arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/iri.2015.51openalex-snapshot
On Extracting Arguments in Favor of One Given Conclusion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1995.tb00025.xopenalex-snapshot
A LOGIC OF ARGUMENTATION FOR REASONING UNDER UNCERTAINTY
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/158976.158977openalex-snapshot
A logical framework for modelling legal argument
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/158976.159001openalex-snapshot
A simple computational model for nonmonotonic and adversarial legal reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/158976.159002openalex-snapshot
A design for reasoning with policies, precedents, and rationales
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/222092.222096openalex-snapshot
On the relation between legal language and legal argument
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/292182.292187openalex-snapshot
Managing inconsistent specifications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12681/eadd/17424openalex-snapshot
Symbolic representations and common - sense reasoning in open multi - agent systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-436-7-89openalex-snapshot
Dynamic Derivations for Sequent-Based Logical Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/aac-200536openalex-snapshot
A logic of defeasible argumentation: Constructing arguments in justification logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/sw-140140openalex-snapshot
Defeasibility in answer set programs with defaults and argumentation rules
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.33612/diss.136479932openalex-snapshot
Reasoning with Defeasible Reasons
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4114/ia.v19i58.1129openalex-snapshot
Restablecimiento y especificidad en Sistemas Argumentativos
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4230/lipics.iclp.2011.162openalex-snapshot
Transaction Logic with Defaults and Argumentation Theories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.cs/0207065openalex-snapshot
Embedding Default Logic in Propositional Argumentation Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/15e9b415z4c63z4383zb324z9e0cf5e3b487openalex-snapshot
Contributions aux approches logiques de l'argumentation en intelligence artificielle
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.