On the public citation graph

Information fusion in logic: A brief overview

0 signed · 68 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/int.4550090103openalex-snapshot
A glance at revision and updating in knowledge bases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/int.4550090107openalex-snapshot
Interference logic = conditional logic + frame axiom
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54507-7_3openalex-snapshot
Making inconsistency respectable: A logical framework for inconsistency in reasoning, part I — A position paper
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58095-6_13openalex-snapshot
A logical approach to multi-sources reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_15openalex-snapshot
Automated reasoning with merged contradictory information whose reliability depends on topics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_47openalex-snapshot
Why defeasible deontic logic needs a multi preference semantics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_5openalex-snapshot
A local approach to reasoning under inconsistency in stratified knowledge bases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_6openalex-snapshot
Quasi-classical logic: Non-trivializable classical reasoning from inconsistent information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61313-7_97openalex-snapshot
A system for defeasible argumentation, with defeasible priorities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1488-8_10openalex-snapshot
Defeasible Reasoning with Legal Rules
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05689-9openalex-snapshot
An Introduction to Default Logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1161-7_2openalex-snapshot
A Useful Four-Valued Logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5054-5_6openalex-snapshot
Reasoning About Merged Information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1739-7_1openalex-snapshot
Introduction to Actual and Potential Contradictions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1739-7_2openalex-snapshot
Paraconsistent Logics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1739-7_3openalex-snapshot
Modal Logics for Representing Incoherent Knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00154005openalex-snapshot
On inference from inconsistent premisses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00935736openalex-snapshot
Introduction: Paraconsistent logics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01531263openalex-snapshot
An argumentation framework in default logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0028192openalex-snapshot
Making inconsistency respectable: Part 2 — Meta-level handling of inconsistency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(79)90008-0openalex-snapshot
A truth maintenance system
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(86)90080-9openalex-snapshot
An assumption-based TMS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(88)90031-8openalex-snapshot
A model for belief revision
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(88)90077-xopenalex-snapshot
A logical framework for default reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(92)90105-7openalex-snapshot
A logic for reasoning with inconsistent knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(95)00100-xopenalex-snapshot
A semantics for reasoning consistently in the presence of inconsistency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-023x(95)00013-iopenalex-snapshot
Argumentative logics: Reasoning with classically inconsistent information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4379(89)90044-6openalex-snapshot
How to recognize interesting topics to provide cooperative answering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-1451-1.50054-8openalex-snapshot
Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-1453-5.50009-xopenalex-snapshot
Consistent Belief Reasoning in the Presence of Inconsistency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0049-237x(08)70642-6openalex-snapshot
On the Imaginary Logic of N. A. Vasil'év
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511663109openalex-snapshot
Updating Logical Databases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/32.310667openalex-snapshot
Inconsistency handling in multiperspective specifications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/69.88001openalex-snapshot
Combining multiple knowledge bases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/isre.1997.566844openalex-snapshot
Analysing inconsistent specifications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tai.1996.560397openalex-snapshot
Intelligent text handling using default logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00337.xopenalex-snapshot
COMBINING KNOWLEDGE BASES CONSISTING OF FIRST‐ORDER THEORIES
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/222092.222096openalex-snapshot
On the relation between legal language and legal argument
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/222092.222241openalex-snapshot
Solving normative conflicts by merging roles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093891487openalex-snapshot
On the theory of inconsistent formal systems.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.21236/ada144937openalex-snapshot
Updating Logical Databases.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2274239openalex-snapshot
On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2x8v8c7.8openalex-snapshot
Systems of Paraconsistent Logic

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45581-7_19openalex-snapshot
Coping with Inconsistent Constraint Specifications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19570-0_10openalex-snapshot
Repairing Non-monotonic Knowledge Bases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35514-2_2openalex-snapshot
Inconsistency Measurement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58449-8_23openalex-snapshot
An Algorithm for the Contension Inconsistency Measure Using Reductions to Answer Set Programming
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58449-8_6openalex-snapshot
Measuring Disagreement with Interpolants
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60438-1_23openalex-snapshot
Rule-Based Reasoning with Belief Structures
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45062-7_40openalex-snapshot
Epistemic Logics for Information Fusion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1923-1_11openalex-snapshot
Type-Theoretical Dynamics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-006-9043-0openalex-snapshot
A split-combination approach to merging knowledge bases in possibilistic logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0328-zopenalex-snapshot
Computer science and decision theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9370-2openalex-snapshot
Majority merging by adaptive counting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103344openalex-snapshot
Handling and measuring inconsistency in non-monotonic logics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2004.09.003openalex-snapshot
Evaluating violations of expectations to find exceptional information
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.06.002openalex-snapshot
Inconsistency-tolerant reasoning over linear probabilistic knowledge bases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2005.05.002openalex-snapshot
Merging operators: Beyond the finite case
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.001openalex-snapshot
On the interplay between inconsistency and incompleteness in multi-perspective requirements specifications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2005.01.021openalex-snapshot
Qualitative reasoning about consistency in geographic information
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-023x(00)00019-7openalex-snapshot
Merging potentially inconsistent items of structured text
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888900002046openalex-snapshot
Reasoning with inconsistency in structured text
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014606325783openalex-snapshot
Handling Locally Stratified Inconsistent Knowledge Bases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/ific.2000.862670openalex-snapshot
Applying theory of evidence in multisensor data fusion: a logical interpretation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/1042038.1042043openalex-snapshot
A modal logic framework for multi-agent belief fusion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21954/ou.ro.000084dcopenalex-snapshot
Fusing Automatically Extracted Annotations for the Semantic Web
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3166/jancl.14.247-274openalex-snapshot
Belief fusion and revision: an overview based on epistemic logic semantics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4156/jdcta.vol4.issue2.9openalex-snapshot
Fusion Techniques for Reliable Information: A Survey
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.