On the public citation graph
The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research
0 signed · 333 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0845-1_3openalex-snapshot
Higher Education Management
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02192823openalex-snapshot
Internal criteria for scientific choice: An evaluation of research in high-energy physics using electron accelerators
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(84)90133-2openalex-snapshot
Science and technology policy in the 1980s and beyond
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(83)90005-7openalex-snapshot
Assessing basic research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90014-3openalex-snapshot
CERN: Past performance and future prospects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3050879openalex-snapshot
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1992.tb00785.xopenalex-snapshot
The influence of primary task on R&D laboratory evaluation: a comparative bibliometric analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.132.3435.1229openalex-snapshot
Identifying Significant Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/030631278001000202openalex-snapshot
Production and Citation Measures in the Sociology of Science: The Problem of Multiple Authorship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/030631283013001004openalex-snapshot
Assessing Basic Research: The Case of the Isaac Newton Telescope
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/030631295025003003openalex-snapshot
Author Judgements about Works They Cite: Three Studies from Psychology Journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2217783openalex-snapshot
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2233880openalex-snapshot
Investing in the Future: An International Comparison of Government Funding of Academic and Related Research.
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1932135openalex-extracted
A Fuzzy-Based Scoring Rule for Author Ranking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1983185openalex-extracted
Measuring Innovation Efficacy: An Operational Framework for Mapping and Measuring Innovation Capacity and Performance of Countries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2722500openalex-extracted
The Evaluation of Research Infrastructures: A Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3124931openalex-extracted
Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor in a Rapidly Changing Digital World
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3202220openalex-extracted
Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of HL-LHC
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4755494openalex-extracted
Foundations of Narrative Bibliometrics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4776641openalex-extracted
Gamification in Entrepreneurship Education: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1999)50:2<115::aid-asi3>3.0.co;2-jopenalex-snapshot
Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(2000)51:2<123::aid-asi4>3.0.co;2-nopenalex-snapshot
Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance: A case study of Kurdish scholarship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20227openalex-snapshot
Ranking the research productivity of library and information science faculty and schools: An evaluation of data sources and research methods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20677openalex-snapshot
Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20914openalex-snapshot
Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21348openalex-snapshot
A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21368openalex-snapshot
Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21532openalex-snapshot
Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23196openalex-snapshot
A study of research collaboration in the pre‐web and post‐web stages: A coauthorship analysis of the information systems discipline
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23286openalex-snapshot
Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of M endeley user categories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23314openalex-snapshot
Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504301185openalex-snapshot
Citation Analysis: A Comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22660-2_41openalex-snapshot
Evaluation Index to Find Relevant Papers: Improvement of Focused Citation Count
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52391-6openalex-snapshot
The Economics of Big Science: Essays by Leading Scientists and Policymakers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52391-6_11openalex-snapshot
Designing a Research Infrastructure with Impact in Mind
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53793-6_22openalex-snapshot
Funding for Equitable Infectious Disease Research and Development
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69580-3_6openalex-snapshot
How Citations Relate to Research Quality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40349-6_17openalex-snapshot
A Visual Citation Search Engine
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41631-1_1openalex-snapshot
Science and Society. Assessment of Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41631-1_2openalex-snapshot
Commonly Used Indexes for Assessment of Research Production
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58524-6_34openalex-snapshot
Analysis of the Quality of Academic Papers by the Words in Abstracts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf02457962openalex-snapshot
New bibliometric techniques for the evaluation of medical schools
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf02457977openalex-snapshot
General performance indexes calculated for research institutes of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences based on scientometric indicators
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf02458472openalex-snapshot
A compendium of issues for citation analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-017-0412-zopenalex-snapshot
Attribute-based quality classification of academic papers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10108-003-0072-0openalex-snapshot
Publishing performance in economics: Spanish rankings (1990-1999)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s101080300066openalex-snapshot
Publishing performance in economics: Spanish rankings (1990–1999)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-010-9134-8openalex-snapshot
Refining the systematic literature review process—two participant-observer case studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-008-9101-3openalex-snapshot
Search Regimes and the Industrial Dynamics of Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-010-9151-1openalex-snapshot
Innovation Without the Word: William F. Ogburn’s Contribution to the Study of Technological Innovation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-014-9254-1openalex-snapshot
University Knowledge Production and Innovation: Getting a Grip
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01562-yopenalex-snapshot
Methodi Ordinatio 2.0: revisited under statistical estimation, and presenting FInder and RankIn
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9142-yopenalex-snapshot
The Effects of University–Industry Relationships and Academic Research On Scientific Performance: Synergy or Substitution?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0210-6openalex-snapshot
Bibliometrics of a controversial scientific literature: Polywater research, 1962-1974
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0251-xopenalex-snapshot
Competition for funding as an indicator of research competitiveness
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0123-zopenalex-snapshot
Composite scientometric indicators for evaluating publications of research institutes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0171-4openalex-snapshot
A new reader trial approach to peer review in funding research grants: An Australian experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0105-9openalex-snapshot
Evaluating the performance of sponsored Chinese herbal medicine research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1986-3openalex-snapshot
Bibliometric analysis of the Czech research publications from 1994 to 2005
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1997-0openalex-snapshot
Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0047-5openalex-snapshot
hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-2058-7openalex-snapshot
Structural equation model with PLS path modeling for an integrated system of publicly funded basic research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0210-zopenalex-snapshot
Assessing publication performance of research units: extensions through operational research and economic techniques
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0286-5openalex-snapshot
To publish or not to publish? On the aggregation and drivers of research performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0769-7openalex-snapshot
Grim tales about the impact factor and the h-index in the Web of Science and the Journal Citation Reports databases: reflections on Vanclay’s criticism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0785-7openalex-snapshot
Love dynamics between science and technology: some evidences in nanoscience and nanotechnology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0792-8openalex-snapshot
Iberian universities: a characterisation from ESI rankings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0912-5openalex-snapshot
Comparison of independent research of China’s top universities using bibliometric indicators
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1049-xopenalex-snapshot
Evaluating the research performance of the Greek medical schools using bibliometrics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1326-3openalex-snapshot
Bibliometric evaluation of the research performance of the Greek civil engineering departments in National and European context
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1437-xopenalex-snapshot
Organizational factors influencing scholarly performance: a multivariate study of biomedical research groups
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1518-xopenalex-snapshot
Identifying patterns and structural influences in the scientific communication of business knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1744-xopenalex-snapshot
Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1828-7openalex-snapshot
Automated Research Impact Assessment: a new bibliometrics approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2042-yopenalex-snapshot
Modelling the Basic Research Competitiveness Index (BR-CI) with an application to the biomass energy field
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2379-xopenalex-snapshot
EM-index: a new measure to evaluate the scientific impact of scientists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2798-3openalex-snapshot
Construction and qualitative assessment of a bibliographic portfolio using the methodology Methodi Ordinatio
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2909-1openalex-snapshot
Gatekeeping African studies: what does “editormetrics” indicate about journal governance?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03406-8openalex-snapshot
Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics: meaningful results by using an improved variant of the disruption index originally proposed by Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03592-5openalex-snapshot
Putting personality in context: determinants of research productivity and impact in political science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03635-xopenalex-snapshot
Basic research intensity and diversified performance: the moderating role of government support intensity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03937-8openalex-snapshot
Iterative weighted EM and iterative weighted EM′-index for scientific assessment of scholars
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04019-5openalex-snapshot
The larger scientific and technological human scale, the better innovation effect? Evidence from key universities in China
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04464-wopenalex-snapshot
Impact of h-index on author’s rankings: an improvement to the h-index for lower-ranked authors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04793-4openalex-snapshot
Co-follower metric on academic-social media ResearchGate: similarities between Derek de Solla Price Memorial Medal winners
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04830-2openalex-snapshot
A two-fold evaluation in science: the case of Nobel Prize
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00712-7openalex-snapshot
Assessing the Origins, Evolution and Prospects of National Innovation Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.05.002openalex-snapshot
Key questions in the development and use of survey-based journal rankings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.06.005openalex-snapshot
Composite journal rankings in library and information science: A factor analytic approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.037openalex-snapshot
The use of the Hirsch index in benchmarking hepatic surgery research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.08.011openalex-snapshot
Blockbuster effect of COVID-19 on the impact factor of infectious disease journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2008.09.024openalex-snapshot
Publicación científica, indicadores bibliométricos e índice h de Hirsch
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.iilr.2007.07.005openalex-snapshot
Trend and patterns in explicit organizational knowledge: A correspondence analysis and cluster analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.06.006openalex-snapshot
Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.001openalex-snapshot
The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001openalex-snapshot
h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.003openalex-snapshot
Scholarly journal evaluation based on panel data analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.001openalex-snapshot
Publication point indicators: A comparative case study of two publication point systems and citation impact in an interdisciplinary context
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.004openalex-snapshot
Multivariate approach to classify research institutes according to their outputs: The case of the CSIC's institutes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.04.003openalex-snapshot
An international comparison of journal publishing and citing behaviours
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.08.004openalex-snapshot
International Collaboration Activity Index: Case study of dye-sensitized solar cells
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.04.006openalex-snapshot
Unravelling the performance of individual scholars: Use of Canonical Biplot analysis to explore the performance of scientists by academic rank and scientific field
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.001openalex-snapshot
Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles? Unweighted or weighted citation impact?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.01.011openalex-snapshot
Research assessment by percentile-based double rank analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.06.004openalex-snapshot
Author ranking evaluation at scale
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.006openalex-snapshot
Rooted citation graphs density metrics for research papers influence evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101013openalex-snapshot
Assigning credit to scientific datasets using article citation networks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101503openalex-snapshot
Rank analysis of most cited publications, a new approach for research assessments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101546openalex-snapshot
Foundations of Narrative Bibliometrics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2014.03.005openalex-snapshot
Ranking of orthopaedic journals: A challenge to the citation-based metrics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2013.10.009openalex-snapshot
Average evaluation intensity: A quality-oriented indicator for the evaluation of research performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.010openalex-snapshot
The scientific value of scientific whaling
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.062openalex-snapshot
Text Mining and Similarity Search Using Extended Tri-gram Algorithm in the Reference Based Local Repository Dataset
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.08.005openalex-snapshot
Journal impact factor or intellectual influence? A content analysis of citation use in Communication Monographs and Human Communication Research (2007–2009)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.001openalex-snapshot
Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.10.002openalex-snapshot
Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.002openalex-snapshot
Proliferation dynamics in new sciences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.013openalex-snapshot
The implications of academic enterprise for public science: An overview of the empirical evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.015openalex-snapshot
How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.009openalex-snapshot
Does massive funding support of researchers work?: Evaluating the impact of the South African research chair funding initiative
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.008openalex-snapshot
Exploring the promises of transdisciplinary research: A quantitative study of two climate research programmes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104627openalex-snapshot
Public support of science: A contingent valuation study of citizens' attitudes about CERN with and without information about implicit taxes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2007.11.011openalex-snapshot
Designing foresight studies for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (NST) future developments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.024openalex-snapshot
Social benefits and costs of large scale research infrastructures
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.02.005openalex-snapshot
Research infrastructures in the LHC era: A scientometric approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.02.007openalex-snapshot
Some remarks concerning the cost/benefit analysis applied to LHC at CERN
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006openalex-snapshot
Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102614openalex-snapshot
Science and technology evaluation reform and universities’ innovation performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.01.017openalex-snapshot
Tracking the evolution of waste recycling research using overlay maps of science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(97)00046-2openalex-snapshot
Institutions and the map of science: matching university departments and fields of research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(98)00026-2openalex-snapshot
Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-2896(03)75417-9openalex-snapshot
Algunas reflexiones y consideraciones sobre el factor de impacto
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-8932(99)75008-6openalex-snapshot
Evaluación de la actividad científica a través de indicadores bibliométricos
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0923-4748(02)00022-xopenalex-snapshot
Government R&D expenditures and US technology advancement in the aerospace industry: a case study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s1130-6343(07)75361-8openalex-snapshot
Análisis bibliométrico de la revista Farmacia Hospitalaria (2001-2006)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096510990811openalex-snapshot
Emerging Models of Collaboration in Political Science: Changes, Benefits, and Challenges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014804608785openalex-snapshot
Researchers" and users" perceptions of the relative standing of biomedical papers in different journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014860726532openalex-snapshot
Subfield problems in applying the Garfield (Impact) Factors in practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016082432660openalex-snapshot
Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021630803637openalex-snapshot
Patent Related Indicators for Assessing Knowledge-Generating Institutions: Towards a Contextualised Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025048516769openalex-snapshot
Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and 'Periphery Effects' in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995-2000
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000018529.58334.ebopenalex-snapshot
The effect of highly cited papers on national citation indicators
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.435openalex-snapshot
The Nature of Social and Personality Psychology as Reflected in JPSP, 1965-2000.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95264-8openalex-snapshot
Quantifying the dynamics of peak disruption in scientific careers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/srep01649openalex-snapshot
A measure for the impact of research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2011.70openalex-snapshot
Assessing Political Science Quality: ‘Excellence in Research for Australia’
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2140763openalex-snapshot
Projecting the socio-economic impact of a big science center: the world’s largest particle accelerator at CERN
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2023.2237150openalex-snapshot
Synthesis of Publication Metrics in Kinesiology-Related Journals: Proxies for Rigor, Usage, and Prestige
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2025.2603938openalex-snapshot
Properties of Kinesiology-Related Journals According to Cabells Journalytics Not Apparent in Other Journal Metrics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2021.2018225openalex-snapshot
Significance of Variable Contributing Factors on Impact Factor of Clarivate Analytics Dental Journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.801950openalex-snapshot
Just how difficult can it be counting up R&D funding for emerging technologies (and is tech mining with proxy measures going to be any better)?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1933412openalex-snapshot
Research types and innovation performance: the mediating effect of paper influence and patent novelty
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1988556openalex-snapshot
Money is not everything: funding investment and dual performance of key universities in China
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2012.10700939openalex-snapshot
Scientometrics or science of science: quantitative, qualitative or mixed one
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2017.1306179openalex-snapshot
A review of eminence of scientometric indicators in scientific research productivity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2024.2341849openalex-snapshot
Are There Meaningful Prestige Metrics of Kinesiology-Related Journals?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2017.1396558openalex-snapshot
What factors inhibit publicly funded principal investigators’ commercialization activities?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2012.670918openalex-snapshot
Evaluation of ninety-three major Greek university departments using Google Scholar
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13682820304815openalex-snapshot
Evaluating UK research in speech and language therapy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/724/1/012012openalex-snapshot
A bibliometric analysis of scientific research on tribology of composites in Southeastern Europe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/20/1/33openalex-snapshot
The rise and rise of citation analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/0199266603.001.0001openalex-snapshot
A History of Sociology in Britain
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/0199266603.003.0003openalex-snapshot
The Rise of Scientific Method
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/0199266603.003.0005openalex-snapshot
British Post-war Sociologists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/0199266603.003.0008openalex-snapshot
Years of Uncertainty 1976–2000
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/0199266603.005.0001openalex-snapshot
The Professorial Survey 2001
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/0199266603.005.0002openalex-snapshot
Students Numbers and Quality 1950–2000
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/0199266603.005.0003openalex-snapshot
Citation and Content Analyses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejab008openalex-snapshot
Does Experiencing International Research Collaboration Permanently Affect the Impact of Scientific Production? Evidence from Africa
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa032openalex-snapshot
The role of metrics in peer assessments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx034openalex-snapshot
Research impact assessment in agriculture—A review of approaches and impact areas
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy006openalex-snapshot
The impacts of diabetes research from 31 European Countries in 2002 to 2013
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx015openalex-snapshot
Strategic behaviour of research groups within the entrepreneurial university policy rhetoric: the Estonian biotechnology sector
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx021openalex-snapshot
European Paradox or Delusion—Are European Science and Economy Outdated?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.07.23295220openalex-snapshot
Computational Methods for Characterizing Research Outputs, Collaborative Networks and Thematic Concentration: a Case Study in Primary Care Research Evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1101/481655openalex-snapshot
Talent Identification at the limits of Peer Review: an analysis of the EMBO Postdoctoral Fellowships Selection Process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211215150openalex-snapshot
The impact of university library resources on university research achievement outputs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/00220410310698734openalex-snapshot
Citation counts and the Research Assessment Exercise V
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/14684521011054099openalex-snapshot
Differences in the rank position of journals by Eigenfactor metrics and the five‐year impact factor in the Journal Citation Reports and the Eigenfactor Project web site
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/14684521011073034openalex-snapshot
Comparison of journal impact rankings in the SCImago Journal & Country Rank and the Journal Citation Reports databases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/14684521211276064openalex-snapshot
The problems with the subject categories schema in the EigenFactor database from the perspective of ranking journals by their prestige and impact
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/17410380710743815openalex-snapshot
The role of federal government funding on the outreach programs of independent industrial R&D establishments in Canada
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-06-2021-0156openalex-snapshot
The weighted impact factor: the paper evaluation index based on the citation ratio
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/bij-02-2021-0111openalex-snapshot
Blending absorptive capacity with open innovation: a bibliometric review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000007207openalex-snapshot
The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/jd-06-2020-0093openalex-snapshot
The steering effects of citations and metrics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/jd-07-2018-0108openalex-snapshot
Bibliometric differences – a case study in bibliometric evaluation across SSH and STEM
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/k-10-2022-1363openalex-snapshot
A review of research on entrepreneurship and crowdfunding: insights from bibliometric analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/lr-05-2013-0058openalex-snapshot
Institutional repositories as complementary tools to evaluate the quantity and quality of research outputs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/oir-02-2015-0041openalex-snapshot
How to conduct a multi-item research assessment in bibliometric studies? Theoretical support and empirical evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/oir-11-2022-0634openalex-snapshot
A contribution-based indicator of research productivity: theoretical definition and empirical testing in the field of communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2913615openalex-snapshot
Identifying the Mode and Impact of Technological Substitutions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3045435openalex-snapshot
Assessing the Scientific Impact of Individual Scholars With Multi-Scale H-Index
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/aemcse50948.2020.00119openalex-snapshot
S-Index: A New Measure to Evaluate the Scientific Impact of Scholars
showing the first 200 of 319 · page through all 319
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.