On the public citation graph
Talent Identification at the limits of Peer Review: an analysis of the EMBO Postdoctoral Fellowships Selection Process
0 signed · 72 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03440100162024openalex-snapshot
The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1116-7_1openalex-snapshot
The Past, Present, and Future of University Rankings
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02129599openalex-snapshot
The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.039openalex-snapshot
Publication metrics and success on the academic job market
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2011.11.001openalex-snapshot
Work–life balance: One size fits all? An exploratory analysis of the differential effects of career stage
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-4870(99)00023-9openalex-snapshot
A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014254214337openalex-snapshot
Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016082432660openalex-snapshot
Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000034384.35498.7dopenalex-snapshot
Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/489203aopenalex-snapshot
Well-funded investigators should receive extra scrutiny
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/544411aopenalex-snapshot
Reviewers are blinkered by bibliometrics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/547007aopenalex-snapshot
Our obsession with eminence warps research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300179openalex-snapshot
Transforming Higher Education in Whose Image? Exploring the Concept of the ‘World-Class’ University in Europe and Asia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307545100openalex-snapshot
Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102openalex-snapshot
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707962104openalex-snapshot
Does the h index have predictive power?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714379115openalex-snapshot
Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713openalex-snapshot
R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/377025openalex-snapshot
Uncertainty, Hiring, and Subsequent Performance: The NFL Draft
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199390076.003.0007openalex-snapshot
Heuristic Decision Making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-12-2012-0214openalex-snapshot
Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.xopenalex-snapshot
Co‐Authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis*
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01178.xopenalex-snapshot
Social Biases and Solutions for Procedural Objectivity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158357openalex-snapshot
Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56openalex-snapshot
The Matthew Effect in Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5301.793openalex-snapshot
The Scientific Wealth of Nations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.336.6084.969openalex-snapshot
NSF's ‘Big Pitch’ Tests Anonymized Grant Reviews
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7302566openalex-snapshot
Chance and Consensus in Peer Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0185openalex-snapshot
Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00064-14openalex-snapshot
Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00422-16openalex-snapshot
Research Funding: the Case for a Modified Lottery
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.296.6624.774openalex-snapshot
Research Policy: Problems with peer review and alternatives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497openalex-snapshot
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346openalex-snapshot
Heuristic Decision Making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002openalex-snapshot
HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES:
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.10.3.153openalex-snapshot
Trends in Multi-Authored Papers in Economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.13130/2282-5398/8626openalex-snapshot
Policy Considerations for Random Allocation of Research Funds
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002010openalex-snapshot
Grant Application Review: The Case of Transparency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003480openalex-snapshot
Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046054openalex-snapshot
Peer Review of Grant Applications: Criteria Used and Qualitative Study of Reviewer Practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106474openalex-snapshot
The Validation of Peer Review through Research Impact Measures and the Implications for Funding Strategies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1890/13.wb.017openalex-snapshot
The predictive power of NSF reviewers and panels
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1982020openalex-snapshot
Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2092499openalex-snapshot
Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: A Test of the "Invisible College" Hypothesis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2579681openalex-snapshot
Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3149486openalex-snapshot
Product Bias in the Central American Common Market
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3152/030234207x265394openalex-snapshot
Focal randomisation: an optimal mechanism for the evaluation of R&D projects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1212.0304openalex-snapshot
Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers: A visualization of results from multi-level models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.13323openalex-snapshot
NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/nadc.20194086258openalex-snapshot
Einstellungskriterium Zufall
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02008-3openalex-snapshot
How to assess the impact of fellowships on academic careers? Latent transition analyses for funding programmes of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04130-7openalex-snapshot
Imaginary carrot or effective fertiliser? A rejoinder on funding and productivity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2019.1603882openalex-snapshot
Practitioners’ perspectives: a funder’s experience of addressing gender balance in its portfolio of awards
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/2330443x.2022.2086190openalex-snapshot
Rethinking the Funding Line at the Swiss National Science Foundation: Bayesian Ranking and Lottery
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.26.400028openalex-snapshot
How to best evaluate applications for junior fellowships? Remote evaluation and face-to-face panel meetings compared
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047386openalex-snapshot
Face-to-face panel meetings versus remote evaluation of fellowship applications: simulation study at the Swiss National Science Foundation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14295/biblos.v32i2.8635openalex-snapshot
Preprints na comunicação científica: uma introdução
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.20350/digitalcsic/10548openalex-snapshot
Grant Allocation Disparities from a Gender Perspective: Literature Review. Synthesis Report
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.571777openalex-snapshot
Automation in the Life Science Research Laboratory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.38126/jspg180105openalex-snapshot
Towards inclusive funding practices for early career researchers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v7ns1.14680openalex-snapshot
Recent advancements in laboratory automation technology and their impact on scientific research and laboratory procedures
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.