On the public citation graph
Variation in Test Validity with Variation in the Distribution of Item Difficulties, Number of Items, and Degree of their Intercorrelation
0 signed · 53 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02288003openalex-snapshot
The Relation between the Difficulty and the Differential Validity of a Test
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02288391openalex-snapshot
The Theory of the Estimation of Test Reliability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02288588openalex-snapshot
The Factorial Interpretation of Test Difficulty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02288734openalex-snapshot
Factor Pattern of Test Items and Tests as a Function of the Correlation Coefficient: Content, Difficulty, and Constant Error Factors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02288877openalex-snapshot
The Relation of Item Difficulty and Inter-Item Correlation to Test Variance and Reliability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02288894openalex-snapshot
Maximum Validity of a Test with Equivalent Items
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289298openalex-snapshot
Test Selection with Integral Gross Score Weights
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070874openalex-snapshot
The difficulty of a test and its diagnostic value.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071867openalex-snapshot
Factors influencing test reliability.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2341876openalex-snapshot
Tables for Statisticians and Biometricians.
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1951.tb00219.xopenalex-snapshot
A MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD APPROACH TO TEST SCORES
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1951.tb00223.xopenalex-snapshot
AN INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATION OF THE RELIABILITY OF MULTIPLE CHOICE TESTS TO THE DISTRIBUTION OF ITEM DIFFICULTIES
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1951.tb00922.xopenalex-snapshot
A THEORY OF TEST SCORES AND THEIR RELATION TO THE TRAIT MEASURED
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1954.tb00485.xopenalex-snapshot
SOME PERSPECTIVES ON “THE ATTENUATION PARADOX IN TEST THEORY”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1955.tb00257.xopenalex-snapshot
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ITEM DIFFICULTY AND TEST VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1972.tb00822.xopenalex-snapshot
INDIVIDUALIZED TESTING AND ITEM CHARACTERISTIC CURVE THEORY*
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9829-6_20openalex-snapshot
Assessment and Prediction Methods in Crime and Delinquency
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf02288778openalex-snapshot
Efficiency of Multiple-Choice Tests as a Function of Spread of Item Difficulties
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf02288781openalex-snapshot
The Relation of the Reliability of Multiple-Choice Tests to the Distribution of Item Difficulties
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289028openalex-snapshot
An Application of Confidence Intervals and of Maximum Likelihood to the Estimation of an Examinee's Ability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf02310555openalex-snapshot
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-024-09964-7openalex-snapshot
Recognize the Value of the Sum Score, Psychometrics’ Greatest Accomplishment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/0191-765x(82)90017-9openalex-snapshot
Selecting items for criterion-referenced tests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-0087-3.50029-2openalex-snapshot
Item Analysis in Relation to Educational and Psychological Testing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30openalex-snapshot
Working Memory and Intelligence: The Same or Different Constructs?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/h0041091openalex-snapshot
The normal curve and the attenuation paradox in test theory.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/h0042247openalex-snapshot
Manipulation of item marginal frequencies by means of multiple-response items.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/h0044001openalex-snapshot
Some perspectives on "the attenuation paradox in test theory."
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/h0056811openalex-snapshot
Item analysis in relation to educational and psychological testing.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/h0058543openalex-snapshot
The attenuation paradox in test theory.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1982.11011819openalex-snapshot
Reconsideration of the “Attenuation Paradox”—and Some New Paradoxes in Test Validity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq219openalex-snapshot
Measuring patient-centredness, the neglected outcome in fertility care: a random multicentre validation study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12044openalex-snapshot
Are True Scores and Construct Scores the Same? A critical examination of their substitutability and the implications for research results
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/001316444600600408openalex-snapshot
The Effect of Bias Due to Difficulty Factors in Product-Moment Item Intercorre-Lations on the Accuracy of Estimation of Reliability by the Kuder-Richardson Formula Number 20
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/001316446202200314openalex-snapshot
The Relationship Between Item Difficulty and Test Validity and Reliability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/001316446202200401openalex-snapshot
Internal-Consistency Reliability Formulas Applied to Randomly Sampled Single-Factor Tests: an Empirical Comparison
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/001316446302300104openalex-snapshot
Deviant Response Tendencies: Their Measurement and Interpretation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/001316446402400406openalex-snapshot
The Effects of Varying Time Limits on Test Validity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000206openalex-snapshot
A Simulation Model for Achievement Testing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/001316447103100110openalex-snapshot
A Comparison of Computer-Simulated Conventional and Branching Tests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400206openalex-snapshot
Approximations to Item Parameters of Mental Test Models and Their Uses1
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/001316447703700304openalex-snapshot
The Urry Method of Approximating the Item Parameters of Latent Trait Theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/001316447803800208openalex-snapshot
Computer Assisted Tailored Testing: Examinee Reactions and Evaluations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290611openalex-snapshot
Gulliksen’s pool: A quick tool for preliminary detection of problematic items in item factor analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2020-0105openalex-snapshot
Spatial thinking from a different view: Disentangling top-down and bottom-up processes using eye tracking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17654/0973563114002openalex-snapshot
IMPROVING TESTS BY USING ITEM ANALYSIS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO EIGHTH STANDARD STUDENTS OF THREE SAMPLED SCHOOLS OF GUWAHATI
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/1168658openalex-snapshot
Construction and Validation of Educational Tests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1957.3.3.635openalex-snapshot
Objective Tests as Instruments of Psychological Theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3102/00346543020001087openalex-snapshot
Chapter IX: Construction and Validation of Educational Tests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3310/hta13120openalex-snapshot
Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3758/bf03192845openalex-snapshot
SAS and SPSS macros to calculate standardized Cronbach’s alpha using the upper bound of the phi coefficient for dichotomous items
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.