On the public citation graph
Acceptability of arguments as ‘logical uncertainty’
0 signed · 84 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5287-7openalex-snapshot
Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(90)90117-oopenalex-snapshot
Non-standard logics for automated reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-1451-1.50018-4openalex-snapshot
Dialectic reasoning with inconsistent information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-1451-1.50054-8openalex-snapshot
Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781118920664.ch4openalex-snapshot
An Argumentation‐based Rough Set Theory for Knowledge Management
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/scj.20391openalex-snapshot
Reasoning with inconsistent knowledge base
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/scj.20539openalex-snapshot
Three‐valued logic for reasoning from an inconsistent knowledge base
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_28openalex-snapshot
Symmetric Argumentation Frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/11591191_42openalex-snapshot
Inference from Controversial Arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48229-6_39openalex-snapshot
Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Reasoning Under Uncertainty in Medical Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_12openalex-snapshot
From non-monotonic syntax-based entailment to preference-based argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4938-5_18openalex-snapshot
From Arguments to Decisions: Extending the Toulmin View
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1486-4_17openalex-snapshot
Cooperative Recognition of Interdatabase Dependencies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_26openalex-snapshot
Base Argumentation as an Abstraction of Deductive Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59294-7_32openalex-snapshot
Expansion and Equivalence Relations on Argumentation Frameworks Based on Logic Programs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61572-1_17openalex-snapshot
Argument-Based Logic Programming for Analogical Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67582-4_15openalex-snapshot
Measuring Disagreement in Argumentation Graphs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75526-5_1openalex-snapshot
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems: Context and Recent Developments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89197-0_46openalex-snapshot
An Argumentation Framework Based on Conditional Priorities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04388-8_3openalex-snapshot
Bridging the Gap between Abstract Argumentation Systems and Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04592-9_3openalex-snapshot
Temporal Logic for Modeling Discovery and Logical Uncertainty
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13062-5_17openalex-snapshot
End-to-End Support for Dating Paleolandforms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30114-8_12openalex-snapshot
Temporal Logics Modeling Logical Uncertainty, Local and Global Chance Discovery
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33362-0_5openalex-snapshot
Stable Semantics in Logic-Based Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33362-0_6openalex-snapshot
The Outcomes of Logic-Based Argumentation Systems under Preferred Semantics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_24openalex-snapshot
Structural Properties for Deductive Argument Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_5openalex-snapshot
Modelling Uncertainty in Persuasion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45772-2_14openalex-snapshot
Modeling Negotiations in Group Decision Support Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0035620openalex-snapshot
Integrating preference orderings into argument-based reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-018-1227-5openalex-snapshot
A formal characterization of the outcomes of rule-based argumentation systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-005-3079-0openalex-snapshot
Guest Editorial: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-007-9025-6openalex-snapshot
Agents that argue and explain classifications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-011-9271-9openalex-snapshot
A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-019-09629-7openalex-snapshot
A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/0169-023x(95)00013-iopenalex-snapshot
Argumentative logics: Reasoning with classically inconsistent information
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/0743-1066(95)00094-1openalex-snapshot
Computer support for protocol-based treatment of cancer
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.012openalex-snapshot
On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2010.12.003openalex-snapshot
Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: Postulates and properties
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.103966openalex-snapshot
A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2024.104203openalex-snapshot
Bisimulation between base argumentation and premise-conclusion argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2012.08.003openalex-snapshot
A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.09.002openalex-snapshot
Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.10.004openalex-snapshot
Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.10.010openalex-snapshot
Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.02.009openalex-snapshot
An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.02.008openalex-snapshot
Cognitive systems at the point of care: The CREDO program
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0888-613x(00)00063-3openalex-snapshot
Cost-bounded argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s1570-8683(03)00013-2openalex-snapshot
Probability, logic and the cognitive foundations of rational belief
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888900002058openalex-snapshot
Argument-based applications to knowledge engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888904000098openalex-snapshot
Argumentation-based negotiation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004987830832openalex-snapshot
Some Syntactic Approaches to the Handling of Inconsistent Knowledge Bases: A Comparative Study Part 1: The Flat Case
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014490210693openalex-snapshot
A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021603608656openalex-snapshot
Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2013.830381openalex-snapshot
Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2014.959332openalex-snapshot
Equivalence in logic-based argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19462160903564592openalex-snapshot
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2013.869765openalex-snapshot
Constructing argument graphs with deductive arguments: a tutorial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2014.881417openalex-snapshot
An argumentation-based approach for reasoning about trust in information sources
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exr037openalex-snapshot
A formal analysis of the role of argumentation in negotiation dialogues
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icdmw.2010.47openalex-snapshot
Temporal Logic TL ^Z_ {DU} Modeling Local and Global Discovery with Logical Uncertainty
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/ictai.2001.974451openalex-snapshot
Inconsistent requirements: an argumentation view
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/ictai.2005.103openalex-snapshot
Prudent semantics for argumentation frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/ictai.2010.38openalex-snapshot
On the Role of Preferences in Argumentation Frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/ictai.2011.100openalex-snapshot
Identifying the Core of Logic-Based Argumentation Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/ictai.2013.97openalex-snapshot
An Axiomatic Approach for Persuasion Dialogs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/intellisys.2015.7361082openalex-snapshot
The CREDO stack: Theory to practice in cognitive systems engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/isre.1997.566844openalex-snapshot
Analysing inconsistent specifications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/itsim.2010.5561565openalex-snapshot
Agent based negotiation in E-commerce
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/mcse.2018.2885412openalex-snapshot
Evidence and Argument: A Cognitive View
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v32i2.2349openalex-snapshot
Providing Decision Support for Cosmogenic Isotope Dating
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3115/v1/w14-21openalex-snapshot
Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3115/v1/w14-2108openalex-snapshot
Automated argumentation mining to the rescue? Envisioning argumentation and decision-making support for debates in open online collaboration communities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3166/jancl.19.311-369openalex-snapshot
Handling controversial arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-39openalex-snapshot
Generalizing stable semantics by preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-928-8-459openalex-snapshot
Risk Assessment in Genetics: A Semi-quantitative Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-117openalex-snapshot
Some Foundations for Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-55openalex-snapshot
A Dialectical Proof Theory for Universal Acceptance in Coherent Logic-Based Argumentation Frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4018/jiit.2010100903openalex-snapshot
Algorithm for Decision Procedure in Temporal Logic Treating Uncertainty, Plausibility, Knowledge and Interacting Agents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1301.7358openalex-snapshot
On the Acceptability of Arguments in Preference-Based Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.65109/ufkt4593openalex-snapshot
A Fully Rational Argumentation System for Preordered Defeasible Rules
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/287e3bf5z984az4b7azbffaz0e578f463977openalex-snapshot
Transparent approach based on deep learning and multiagent argumentation for hypertension management
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/b525d651za4f6z41a3zb4ddzf1ee936dfec7openalex-snapshot
Ranking-based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.