On the public citation graph

Integrating preference orderings into argument-based reasoning

https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0035620
0 signed · 27 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48317-9_15openalex-snapshot
A System for Defeasible Argumentation, with Defeasible Priorities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56735-6_39openalex-snapshot
Management of preferences in assumption-based reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_12openalex-snapshot
From non-monotonic syntax-based entailment to preference-based argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_13openalex-snapshot
Non-monotonic syntax-based entailment: A classification of consequence relations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61313-7_97openalex-snapshot
A system for defeasible argumentation, with defeasible priorities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8242-1_13openalex-snapshot
The Feasibility of Defeat in Defeasible Reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0028186openalex-snapshot
Acceptability of arguments as ‘logical uncertainty’
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(92)90069-aopenalex-snapshot
A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(92)90103-5openalex-snapshot
How to reason defeasibly
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-xopenalex-snapshot
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-023x(95)00013-iopenalex-snapshot
Argumentative logics: Reasoning with classically inconsistent information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-1451-1.50054-8openalex-snapshot
Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-1452-8.50122-6openalex-snapshot
Defeasible reasoning with structured information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tai.1996.560731openalex-snapshot
Comparing arguments using preference orderings for argument-based reasoning

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03098-8_24openalex-snapshot
Computing Preferences in Abstract Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44832-9_2openalex-snapshot
Argumentation for Practical Reasoning: An Axiomatic Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0456-4_3openalex-snapshot
Logics for Defeasible Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-015-9475-5openalex-snapshot
Preferences in artificial intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2017.11.002openalex-snapshot
Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0888-613x(00)00063-3openalex-snapshot
Cost-bounded argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014490210693openalex-snapshot
A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021603608656openalex-snapshot
Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/ictai.2001.974451openalex-snapshot
Inconsistent requirements: an argumentation view
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-379openalex-snapshot
Moving Between Argumentation Frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1301.7358openalex-snapshot
On the Acceptability of Arguments in Preference-Based Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/15e9b415z4c63z4383zb324z9e0cf5e3b487openalex-snapshot
Contributions aux approches logiques de l'argumentation en intelligence artificielle
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/287e3bf5z984az4b7azbffaz0e578f463977openalex-snapshot
Transparent approach based on deep learning and multiagent argumentation for hypertension management
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.