On the public citation graph

Attitudes to crime and criminal justice: Findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey: Home Office research study 200

https://doi.org/10.1037/e454372008-001
0 signed · 29 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3135478openalex-extracted
The Role of Neighbourhood Condition and Ethnicity on Fear of Crime
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19385-9_1openalex-snapshot
Parole: An Uncertain Institution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-008-9088-1openalex-snapshot
Once a Criminal, Always a Criminal?: ‘Redeemability’ and the Psychology of Punitive Public Attitudes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-007-9029-xopenalex-snapshot
Newspaper juries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511520976openalex-snapshot
The Virtual Prison
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511520976.001openalex-snapshot
Forewordby Andrew Ashworth
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511520976.002openalex-snapshot
Preface
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511520976.003openalex-snapshot
Introduction to the concept of community custody
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511520976.004openalex-snapshot
The way we punish now
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511520976.005openalex-snapshot
Conceptualizing community custody
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511520976.006openalex-snapshot
Representative models of community custody
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511520976.007openalex-snapshot
Coming home to prison: offender perceptions and experiences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511520976.008openalex-snapshot
The effect of community custody on prison admissions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511520976.009openalex-snapshot
Public attitudes to community custody
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511520976.010openalex-snapshot
Making community custody sentences work
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511520976.011openalex-snapshot
Notes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511520976.012openalex-snapshot
References
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139168625.019openalex-snapshot
Protecting the rights of young offenders
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14681990410001715418openalex-snapshot
Broken hearts and mending bodies: the impact of trauma on intimacy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/20504721.2017.1343420openalex-snapshot
The decision to participate in mediation and individual factors: the role of moral foundations and their relation to restorative and retributive orientations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azi050openalex-snapshot
Public Opinion Versus Public Judgment About Crime
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azl030openalex-snapshot
Russia and Youth Crime
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935383.013.102openalex-snapshot
Sentencing Councils and Commissions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0887403402013001004openalex-snapshot
Sentencing Juvenile Offenders: Comparing Public Preferences and Judicial Practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/147322540200200203openalex-snapshot
Youth Crime, the ‘Parenting Deficit’ and State Intervention: A Contextual Critique
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/147322540400400103openalex-snapshot
Requirements for Communication in the Courtroom: A Comparative Perspective on the Youth Court in England/Wales and The Netherlands
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4000/champpenal.8246openalex-snapshot
Explorer et comprendre l’insatisfaction du public face à la « clémence » des tribunaux
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4467/12307483pfs.25.015.23650openalex-snapshot
Between an opinion from the judicial expert teams for evaluation and social expectations. Axiological sources of distrust towards the judicial expert teams for evaluation in juvenile cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.54945/gavps.v1i1.8openalex-snapshot
Directory Right or Mandatory Obligation to Participate: Psycho-Legal Dimensions of Victim-Person’s Participation in Criminal Justice System
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.