On the public citation graph
Requirements for Communication in the Courtroom: A Comparative Perspective on the Youth Court in England/Wales and The Netherlands
0 signed · 31 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01499021openalex-snapshot
Theoretical and methodological issues in studying children's capacities in legal contexts.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01499023openalex-snapshot
Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01501658openalex-snapshot
Evaluating adolescent decision making in legal contexts.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.53.2.205openalex-snapshot
The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: Lessons from research on successful children.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/e454372008-001openalex-snapshot
Attitudes to crime and criminal justice: Findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey: Home Office research study 200
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1143396openalex-snapshot
Children and Justice: Decision-Making in Children's Hearings and Juvenile Courts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315439563-18openalex-snapshot
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472562616openalex-snapshot
Punishing Juveniles : Principle and Critique
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2270494openalex-extracted
Juvenile Justice and the Role of Judges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3879-8_13openalex-snapshot
Victim-Offender Mediation and Conferencing with Juvenile Offenders in the Netherlands
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66984-3_3openalex-snapshot
Judge–Witness Courtroom Power Distance Dynamics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.061openalex-snapshot
Surveillance Behavior of Juvenile by using RFID and CCTV Monitoring
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137390400openalex-snapshot
Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/07418820701834584openalex-snapshot
Judicial Censure and Moral Communication to Youth Sex Offenders
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2014.942725openalex-snapshot
The participation of social services in youth justice systems in Europe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00431.xopenalex-snapshot
Indirect Moralising—An Ethnographic Exploration of a Procedural Modality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-29040005openalex-snapshot
Welfare, Justice, and Diverse Models of Youth Justice: A Children’s Rights Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0269758011432954openalex-snapshot
Antidotes to injustice? Victim statements’ impact on victims’ sense of security
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0964663918764004openalex-snapshot
‘Impressed’ by Feelings-How Judges Perceive Defendants’ Emotional Expressions in Danish Courtrooms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/09646639241268921openalex-snapshot
Kinder Justice: Communicating Legitimacy to Children in Sentencing Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1462474514548789openalex-snapshot
Punishment as moral communication: The experiences of long-term prisoners
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1473225407087041openalex-snapshot
Youth Courts and Children's Rights: The Irish Experience
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1473225418819086openalex-snapshot
Realising the Right of the Child to Participate in the Criminal Process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/14732254211004764openalex-snapshot
Sentencing explanations provided via judicial remarks made within the English magistrates’ youth court: Towards a better global understanding
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/14732254241300396openalex-snapshot
Achieving Meaningful Youth Participation in Juvenile Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1477370821996850openalex-snapshot
YOT Talk: Examining the communicative influences on children’s engagement with youth justice assessment processes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i3.738openalex-snapshot
Status of a child witness involved in the offence of an adult in criminal procedure
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31648/sp.8064openalex-snapshot
Konsensualne sposoby zakończenia postępowania karnego w stosunku do nieletniego sprawcy czynu karalnego
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2023.v03i08.033openalex-snapshot
On the Role of Court Interpreter
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.