On the public citation graph

Conviction by numbers

https://doi.org/10.1038/445254a
0 signed · 12 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/427384aopenalex-snapshot
Quashed convictions reignite row over British cot deaths
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/428799aopenalex-snapshot
Statistics don't support cot-death murder theory

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1270597openalex-extracted
Errors in Judicial Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2017.09.005openalex-snapshot
A systematic analysis of misleading evidence in unsafe rulings in England and Wales
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewq019openalex-snapshot
Errors in Judicial Decisions: Experimental Results
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgu011openalex-snapshot
To catch a thief with and without numbers: arguments, scenarios and probabilities in evidential reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgv013openalex-snapshot
Arguments, scenarios and probabilities: connections between three normative frameworks for evidential reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1365712718783427openalex-snapshot
Evidentiary instructions improve mock juror assessment of feature-comparison evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/13657127261490564openalex-snapshot
A Bayesian analysis of the Lucy Letby case: Reasonable doubt
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/dmvm-2013-0084openalex-snapshot
2013: Internationales Jahr der Statistik
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.0708.1401openalex-snapshot
Data selection and confounding in the court case of Lucia de Berk
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1338openalex-snapshot
Risk as an Explanatory Factor for Researchers’ Inferential Interpretations
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.