On the public citation graph

Errors in Judicial Decisions

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1270597
0 signed · 30 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20181-5_26openalex-extracted
Statistical Decision Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-049-6_12openalex-extracted
Blundering Justice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00122574openalex-extracted
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01044641openalex-extracted
Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01064271openalex-extracted
Bayes' theorem in the trial process: Instructing jurors on the value of statistical evidence.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9073-5openalex-extracted
Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9115-7openalex-extracted
On the diagnosticity of multiple-witness identifications.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3openalex-extracted
Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(98)00051-1openalex-extracted
Strategies of search
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-4870(99)00038-0openalex-extracted
Decisions and strategies in a sequential search experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511809477.019openalex-extracted
Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511809477.026openalex-extracted
Conservatism in human information processing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511812651.003openalex-extracted
Statistical Decision Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00003435openalex-extracted
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00041157openalex-extracted
The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.71.1.168openalex-extracted
Juror underutilization of eyewitness nonidentifications: Theoretical and practical implications.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.1.168openalex-extracted
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/087345a0openalex-extracted
An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/445254aopenalex-extracted
Conviction by numbers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316030001629292openalex-extracted
The impact of different types of expert scientific testimony on mock jurors’ liability verdicts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgm003openalex-extracted
On the (ab)use of statistics in the legal case against the nurse Lucia de B.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icdar.2007.4377030openalex-extracted
Towards Explainable Writer Verification and Identification Using Vantage Writers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937x.2009.00557.xopenalex-extracted
A Truth Serum for Non-Bayesians: Correcting Proper Scoring Rules for Risk Attitudes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2005.00075.xopenalex-extracted
Statistics on Trial
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2005.00089.xopenalex-extracted
Appealing Statistics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024700openalex-extracted
Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.257634openalex-extracted
Inside the Judicial Mind
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2345046openalex-extracted
An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3053225openalex-extracted
Human Information Processing and Adjudication: Trial by Heuristics

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i1.175openalex-snapshot
Artificial Intelligence and Quality of Composition Verdicts in Indonesia: Lessons from New Zealand
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.