On the public citation graph
Philosophical Conjectures and Their Refutation
0 signed · 107 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/clad.1997.0046openalex-snapshot
Probabilism and Phylogenetic Inference
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/clad.1999.0123openalex-snapshot
The Science of Phylogenetic Systematics: Explanation, Prediction, and Test
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/clad.2001.0165openalex-snapshot
Philosophy and Phylogenetic Inference: A Comparison of Likelihood and Parsimony Methods in the Context of Karl Popper's Writings on Corroboration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69024-2_35openalex-snapshot
Methods for Inferring Phylogenies: A Statistical View
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_14openalex-snapshot
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01734359openalex-snapshot
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02459467openalex-snapshot
Links between maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony under a simple model of site substitution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4403(76)90038-8openalex-snapshot
Human evolutionary trees
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/44766openalex-snapshot
Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150118268openalex-snapshot
Philosophy and Phylogenetic Inference: A Comparison of Likelihood and Parsimony Methods in the Context of Karl Popper's Writings on Corroboration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150119150openalex-snapshot
Popper and Likelihood Versus "Popper"
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/412935openalex-snapshot
Numerical Methods for Inferring Evolutionary Trees
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026364openalex-snapshot
Parsimony, Likelihood, and the Role of Models in Molecular Phylogenetics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/27.4.401openalex-snapshot
Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/44.3.299openalex-snapshot
Objections to Bootstrapping Phylogenies: A Critique
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/45.3.363openalex-snapshot
General Inconsistency Conditions for Maximum Parsimony: Effects of Branch Lengths and Increasing Numbers of Taxa
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1981.tb01847.xopenalex-snapshot
A likelihood approach to character weighting and what it tells us about parsimony and compatibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1997.tb00242.xopenalex-snapshot
Testability and the Refutation and Corroboration of Cladistic Hypotheses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1997.tb00322.xopenalex-snapshot
Probabilism and Phylogenetic Inference
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1999.tb00391.xopenalex-snapshot
Long-Branch Abstractions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.1997.tb00424.xopenalex-snapshot
Sophisticated falsification and research cycles: Consequences for differential character weighting in phylogenetic systematics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5310.227openalex-snapshot
Phylogenetic Methods Come of Age: Testing Hypotheses in an Evolutionary Context
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5420.1625openalex-snapshot
Being an Absolute Skeptic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.437openalex-snapshot
Phylogeny Estimation and Hypothesis Testing Using Maximum Likelihood
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.10.010165.000525openalex-snapshot
Phylogenetic Systematics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.002513openalex-snapshot
PHYLOGENIES FROM MOLECULAR SEQUENCES: INFERENCE AND RELIABILITY
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.22.1.521openalex-snapshot
Phylogenies From Molecular Sequences: Inference And Reliability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2218271openalex-snapshot
Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2412923openalex-snapshot
Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods Will be Positively Misleading
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2992355openalex-snapshot
Maximum Likelihood Inference of Phylogenetic Trees, with Special Reference to a Poisson Process Model of DNA Substitution and to Parsimony Analyses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203090732-9openalex-snapshot
The Logic of Scientific Discovery
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3825.1.1zenodo-depositor-declared
Molecular systematics of terraranas (Anura: Brachycephaloidea) with an assessment of the effects of alignment and optimality criteria
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781119990475.ch4openalex-snapshot
Progress and Obstacles in the Phylogenetics of Modern Birds
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68436-5_56-1openalex-snapshot
Abduction as Phylogenetic Inference: Epistemological Perspectives in Scientific Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10135-9_56openalex-snapshot
Abduction as Phylogenetic Inference: Epistemological Perspectives in Scientific Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf02814479openalex-snapshot
Homologies in phylogenetic analyses – concept and tests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-007-9025-6openalex-snapshot
Popper, Laws, and the Exclusion of Biology from Genuine Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-008-9058-5openalex-snapshot
What, Exactly, is Cladistics? Re-writing the History of Systematics and Biogeography
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-008-9066-5openalex-snapshot
Evidence, Content and Corroboration and the Tree of Life
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-009-9070-4openalex-snapshot
Explanation and Falsification in Phylogenetic Inference: Exercises in Popperian Philosophy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-004-0679-zopenalex-snapshot
Monophyly, Paraphyly, and Natural Kinds
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-7325-2openalex-snapshot
The ‘requirement of total evidence’ and its role in phylogenetic systematics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-017-9577-zopenalex-snapshot
When is a cladist not a cladist?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-017-9891-3openalex-snapshot
On the Scientific Methods of Kuhn and Popper: Implications of Paradigm-Shifts to Development Models
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-016-9381-8openalex-snapshot
Phylogenetic Hypotheses: Neither Testable Nor Falsifiable
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-016-0274-6openalex-snapshot
Dispelling five myths about hypothesis testing in biological systematics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2005.11.007openalex-snapshot
Support versus corroboration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2003.12.012openalex-snapshot
Molecular phylogenetics of the Meteoriaceae s. str.: focusing on the genera Meteorium and Papillaria
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2005.01.003openalex-snapshot
Falsifications and corroborations: Karl Popper’s influence on systematics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0748-3007(02)00008-7openalex-snapshot
Is Karl Popper's philosophy of science all things to all people?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0748-3007(02)00125-1openalex-snapshot
Distinguishing “or” from “and” and the case for historical identification
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0748-3007(02)00146-9openalex-snapshot
Taxon names as paradigms: the structure of nomenclatural revolutions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0748-3007(03)00050-1openalex-snapshot
On the deduction of species relationships: a précis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0748-3007(03)00072-0openalex-snapshot
The repugnant and the mature in phylogenetic inference: atemporal similarity and historical identity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0748-3007(03)00074-4openalex-snapshot
Data exploration in phylogenetic inference: scientific, heuristic, or neither
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0022336000057954openalex-snapshot
The Narrow Way - Randall T. Schuh 2000. Biological Systematics: Principles and Applications. Cornell University Press, 256 p.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s147720000999017xopenalex-snapshot
Perspective: Parsimony, explanatory power, and dynamic homology testing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00228.xopenalex-snapshot
Semaphoronts, cladograms and the roots of total evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-6409.2002.00101.xopenalex-snapshot
Divergent evolution, hierarchy and cladistics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/is02016openalex-snapshot
Systematics and biogeography of the family Scorpionidae (Chelicerata : Scorpiones), with a discussion on phylogenetic methods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/sb03017openalex-snapshot
From species to supertrees: Popperian corroboration and some current controversies in systematics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1071/sb14025openalex-snapshot
Popper and phylogenetics, a misguided rendezvous
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1078/1439-6092-00051openalex-snapshot
Testing and weighting characters
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1078/1439-6092-00052openalex-snapshot
Weighting indels as phylogenetic markers of 18S rDNA sequences in Diptera and Strepsiptera
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02698590802496789openalex-snapshot
Matters of Demarcation: Philosophy, Biology, and the Evolving Fraternity between Disciplines
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10635150309324openalex-snapshot
Failed Refutations: Further Comments on Parsimony and Likelihood Methods and Their Relationship to Popper's Degree of Corroboration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/106351591007444openalex-snapshot
On Probability and Systematics: Possibility, Probability, and Phylogenetic Inference
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297306.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297306.003.0008openalex-snapshot
Parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syu064openalex-snapshot
Popperian Corroboration and Phylogenetics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz088openalex-snapshot
Exploring the impact of morphology, multiple sequence alignment and choice of optimality criteria in phylogenetic inference: a case study with the Neotropical orb-weaving spider genus Wagneriana (Araneae: Araneidae)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.0300-3256.2004.00160.xopenalex-snapshot
The measurement of test severity, significance tests for resolution, and a unified philosophy of phylogenetic inference
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.0300-3256.2004.00164.xopenalex-snapshot
Phylogenetic nomenclature is compatible with diverse philosophical perspectives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2002.tb00294.xopenalex-snapshot
Distinguishing “or” from “and” and the case for historical identification
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2003.tb00297.xopenalex-snapshot
Parsimony, likelihood, and simplicity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2003.tb00311.xopenalex-snapshot
Data exploration in phylogenetic inference: scientific, heuristic, or neither
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.00013.xopenalex-snapshot
The nightmare of the combination: comments on matrix representation with parsimony and its first application in biogeography
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.00020.xopenalex-snapshot
On total evidence: for the record
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.00029.xopenalex-snapshot
Escaping the matrix: a new algorithm for phylogenetic comparative studies of co‐evolution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00082.xopenalex-snapshot
Stability, sensitivity, science and heurism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00100.xopenalex-snapshot
From conviction to anti‐superfluity: old and new justifications of parsimony in phylogenetic inference
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00110.xopenalex-snapshot
Rejecting “the given” in systematics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00169.xopenalex-snapshot
The unfalsifiability of cladograms and its consequences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00214.xopenalex-snapshot
Parsimony and explanatory power
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00231.xopenalex-snapshot
Clade support measures and their adequacy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.2006.00370.xopenalex-snapshot
Logic in systematics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2006.00277.xopenalex-snapshot
A falsificationist perspective on the usage of process frequencies in phylogenetics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11606/2176-7793/2020.51.02openalex-snapshot
Popper as a process: revisiting the appropriation of the Popperian philosophy by the cladists during the “systematics wars”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11606/t.41.2018.tde-20082018-134133openalex-snapshot
Systematics and evolution of the orb-weaving spider genus Wagneriana F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1904 (Araneae; Araneidae)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3435.1.2openalex-snapshot
The limits of understanding in biological systematics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0215openalex-snapshot
Editorial: Errors in the Variables, Unobserved Heterogeneity, and Other Ways of Hiding Statistical Error
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2004.022openalex-snapshot
Signs and phylogeny: A semiotic approach to systematics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-62252012000100003openalex-snapshot
Monophyly of Heterandriini (Teleostei: Poeciliidae) revisited: a critical review of the data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1655/herpetologica-d-21-00015openalex-snapshot
The Enigmatic Hyloxalus edwardsi Species Group (Anura: Dendrobatidae): Phylogenetic Position, a New Species, and New Putative Morphological Synapomorphies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1666/0022-3360(2002)076<1113:r>2.0.co;2openalex-snapshot
Book Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5691/jjb.28.s25openalex-snapshot
Statistical Sciences and Evolutionary Biology with Special Reference to Phylogeny Estimation
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.