On the public citation graph
Collective Reflective Equilibrium in Practice (CREP) and controversial novel technologies
0 signed · 114 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199909)19:9<808::aid-pd637>3.0.co;2-bopenalex-snapshot
Termination rates after prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome, spina bifida, anencephaly, and Turner and Klinefelter syndromes: a systematic literature review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.27openalex-snapshot
Why and When Should We Use Public Deliberation?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103261openalex-snapshot
Adapting a kidney exchange algorithm to align with human values
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.003openalex-snapshot
To push or not to push? Affective influences on moral judgment depend on decision frame
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00343-xopenalex-snapshot
Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0711-6openalex-snapshot
From public preferences to ethical policy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6openalex-snapshot
The Moral Machine experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910125116openalex-snapshot
Veil-of-ignorance reasoning favors the greater good
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12869openalex-snapshot
Collective Reflective Equilibrium in Practice (CREP) and controversial novel technologies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2654openalex-snapshot
The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7291.875openalex-snapshot
Resources, Down's syndrome, and cardiac surgery
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2017-104428openalex-snapshot
Golden opportunity, reasonable risk and personal responsibility for health
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-105167openalex-snapshot
‘Is it better not to know certain things?’: views of women who have undergone non-invasive prenatal testing on its possible future applications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105382openalex-snapshot
Responsibility in healthcare across time and agents
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116685866openalex-snapshot
Framing Effect in the Trolley Problem and Footbridge Dilemma
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617752640openalex-snapshot
Of Mice, Men, and Trolleys: Hypothetical Judgment Versus Real-Life Behavior in Trolley-Style Moral Dilemmas
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0152-yopenalex-snapshot
The Intensive Care Lifeboat: a survey of lay attitudes to rationing dilemmas in neonatal intensive care
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0272-7openalex-snapshot
Rationing elective surgery for smokers and obese patients: responsibility or prognosis?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00122openalex-snapshot
Using Virtual Reality to Assess Ethical Decisions in Road Traffic Scenarios: Applicability of Value-of-Life-Based Models and Influences of Time Pressure
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4681063openalex-extracted
Entangled Challenges: Policymaking for Quantum Computing and Other Novel Technologies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03169-3_10openalex-snapshot
Contemporary Perspectives on AI and Neurocomputational Ethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-20117-1_11openalex-snapshot
Toward Better Socio-digital Environments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-8023-1_21openalex-snapshot
Pathways, Limitations, and Future Directions for Embedding Values in Large Models
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01614-9openalex-snapshot
“Just” accuracy? Procedural fairness demands explainability in AI-based medical resource allocations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01813-yopenalex-snapshot
Moral judgment in realistic traffic scenarios: moving beyond the trolley paradigm for ethics of autonomous vehicles
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02474-9openalex-snapshot
AI preference prediction and policy making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-03030-9openalex-snapshot
Justifiability and AI: putting explainability in its place
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-024-00805-8openalex-snapshot
When Should Popular Views be Included in a Reflective Equilibrium?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09613-yopenalex-snapshot
Psychological consequences of legal responsibility misattribution associated with automated vehicles
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09722-wopenalex-snapshot
Digitising reflective equilibrium
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-025-09882-xopenalex-snapshot
Disruptive technologies, engineered concepts, and normative guidance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04544-9openalex-snapshot
Reflective equilibrium in practice and model selection: a methodological proposal from a survey experiment on the theories of distributive justice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04729-2openalex-snapshot
Seeking a reflective equilibrium in the face of disagreement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10286-zopenalex-snapshot
The Vagueness of Integrating the Empirical and the Normative: Researchers’ Views on Doing Empirical Bioethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00525-wopenalex-snapshot
Moral Intuition Regarding the Possibility of Conscious Human Brain Organoids: An Experimental Ethics Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-025-00528-1openalex-snapshot
Moral Complexity in Traffic: Advancing the ADC Model for Automated Driving Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-025-00547-yopenalex-snapshot
Does Humanness Matter? An Ethical Evaluation of Sharing Care Work with Social Robots
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-025-09610-8openalex-snapshot
Moral Characteristics Underpinning Concerns for Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Cross-Cultural Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-026-00282-5openalex-snapshot
Trust-based beneficence and relational autonomy in neonatal ethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-026-00291-4openalex-snapshot
Eliciting normative judgments for ethically and politically legitimate policy-making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-024-00299-0openalex-snapshot
Debate: Should Parents be able to Request Non-Resuscitation for All Extremely Premature Newborn Infants?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00496-5openalex-snapshot
Aligning artificial intelligence with moral intuitions: an intuitionist approach to the alignment problem
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00591-7openalex-snapshot
Crash dilemmas and the ethical design of self-driving vehicles: implications from metaethics and pragmatic road marks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00631-2openalex-snapshot
The need for an empirical research program regarding human–AI relational norms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01257-2openalex-snapshot
Ethical framework for AI-based emotion regulation for performance enhancement in sport
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2024.151470openalex-snapshot
Beyond consciousness: Ethical, legal, and social issues in human brain organoid research and application
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116794openalex-snapshot
Preparing popular views for inclusion in a reflective equilibrium: A case study on illness severity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0953820822000395openalex-snapshot
Of trolleys and self-driving cars: What machine ethicists can and cannot learn from trolleyology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180124000719openalex-snapshot
Collective Reflective Equilibrium, Algorithmic Bioethics and Complex Ethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02506-4openalex-snapshot
Refining the role of behavioural and social sciences in pandemic response post-COVID-19
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-024-00593-4openalex-snapshot
Global Healthspan Summit 2023: closing the gap between healthspan and lifespan
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2075968openalex-snapshot
How to Use AI Ethically for Ethical Decision-Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2024.2399852openalex-snapshot
Why It Could Be Ethical to Return to Biological Categories in Sport: Values-Based Rules
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2025.2497972openalex-snapshot
A Justice-First Approach to Ambient Intelligence in Healthcare
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2024.2303154openalex-snapshot
Strong Bipartisan Support for Controlled Psilocybin Use as Treatment or Enhancement in a Representative Sample of US Americans: Need for Caution in Public Policy Persists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2025.2474911openalex-snapshot
‘Why Do You Ask?’ Revisiting the Purpose of Eliciting the Public’s Moral Judgments About Emerging Technologies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780198945215.003.0094openalex-snapshot
How Relational Context Matters for Human-AI Cooperation Within Organizations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae264openalex-snapshot
Ethics of artificial intelligence in embryo assessment: mapping the terrain
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhag005openalex-snapshot
Parfitian Priority, Gene Therapy, and Disability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192871688.003.0009openalex-snapshot
Ethics of Selective Restriction of Liberty in a Pandemic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192871688.003.0011openalex-snapshot
Pluralism and Allocation of Limited Resources
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197628478.001.0001openalex-snapshot
The Bioethics of Space Exploration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197628478.003.0001openalex-snapshot
The Place of Space Bioethics in the Philosophy and Ethics of Space Missions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197628478.003.0002openalex-snapshot
Human Health Risks in Space and the Methodology of Space Bioethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197628478.003.0003openalex-snapshot
Biomedical Human Enhancement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197628478.003.0004openalex-snapshot
Germline Gene Editing and Embryo Selection for Future Long-Term Space Missions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197628478.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Justification of Human Enhancement versus Rationale for Space Missions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197628478.003.0006openalex-snapshot
Is the Bioethics of Space Missions Different from Bioethics on Earth?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197628478.003.0007openalex-snapshot
Moral Bioenhancement in Long-Term Space Missions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197628478.003.0008openalex-snapshot
Space Bioethics, Population Ethics, and Space Colonization
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197628478.005.0001openalex-snapshot
Bioethics of Space Missions in the Light of Futures Studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197639191.003.0004openalex-snapshot
Trolleys and Autonomous Vehicles
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13440openalex-snapshot
Should We Use Behavioural Predictions in Organ Allocation?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70013openalex-snapshot
Against Public‐Facing Religious Bio‐Restrictionism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70072openalex-snapshot
Assessing Risk Thresholds in Controlled Human Infection Models (CHIM)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70156openalex-snapshot
Respectful Debiasing in Democratic Deliberation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062561openalex-snapshot
Race and resource allocation: an online survey of US and UK adults’ attitudes toward COVID-19 ventilator and vaccine distribution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108515openalex-snapshot
Going high and low: on pluralism and neutrality in human embryology policy-making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108702openalex-snapshot
Justification of principles for healthcare priority setting: the relevance and roles of empirical studies exploring public values
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110145openalex-snapshot
Polygenic risk scores and embryonic screening: considerations for regulation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110490openalex-snapshot
Singaporean attitudes to cognitive enhancement: a cross-sectional survey
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110583openalex-snapshot
Artificial intelligence, existential risk and equity: the need for multigenerational bioethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2025-111065openalex-snapshot
Academic freedom, artificial intelligence and the blandification of ethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/jmepb-2025-000007openalex-snapshot
Autonomy, oppression and genetic enhancements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/jmepb-2026-000266openalex-snapshot
Discrimination or protection? Investigating the ethics of limiting athletes’ participation in sports on public health and individual well-being grounds
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3715275.3732174openalex-snapshot
The Hard Problem of AI Alignment: Value Forks in Moral Judgment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-030123-113559openalex-snapshot
The Moral Psychology of Artificial Intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251386037openalex-snapshot
When is black-box AI justifiable to use in healthcare?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00845-1openalex-snapshot
Acceptable objectives of empirical research in bioethics: a qualitative exploration of researchers’ views
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01353-8openalex-snapshot
Autonomy under pressure: a scoping review of social egg freezing in the bottom quintile of the gender gap index
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01377-8openalex-snapshot
Cognitive gene enhancements and the capitalist meritocracy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01536-xopenalex-snapshot
Medical artificial intelligence and the right to health
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-026-03355-xopenalex-snapshot
Ethical, legal, and social issues of AI use in emergency healthcare: a scoping review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.24721.1openalex-snapshot
The Problem (and the Value) of Radical Moral Disagreement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011933openalex-snapshot
Ethical frameworks should be applied to computational modelling of infectious disease interventions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275812openalex-snapshot
Personal ethical settings for driverless cars and the utility paradox: An ethical analysis of public attitudes in UK and Japan
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2023.1.44388openalex-snapshot
Veículos Autônomos e Equilíbrio Reflexivo Amplo Coletivo
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.269377openalex-snapshot
Three Limitations of Reflective Equilibrium’s Justificatory Claims
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2026.1788161openalex-snapshot
Japanese attitudes toward human brain organoid research: broad support amid ethical concerns
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1508763openalex-snapshot
Morality on the road: the ADC model in low-stakes traffic vignettes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.smj-2023-279openalex-snapshot
Ethics of artificial intelligence in medicine
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781003301424-18openalex-snapshot
The Use and Abuse of Moral Preferences in the Ethics of Self-Driving Cars
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.508771openalex-snapshot
¿Automatizando la mejora moral humana? La inteligencia artificial para la ética
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26557802openalex-snapshot
Additional file 1 of Acceptable objectives of empirical research in bioethics: a qualitative exploration of researchers’ views
showing the first 92 of 93 · page through all 93
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.