On the public citation graph

“Neuromyths”: A Critical Consideration

0 signed · 37 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.017openalex-snapshot
Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x0999152xopenalex-snapshot
The weirdest people in the world?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x1000018xopenalex-snapshot
WEIRD languages have misled us, too [Comment on Henrich et al.]
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.48.1.26openalex-snapshot
The structure of phenotypic personality traits.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12193openalex-snapshot
Neuromyths and Their Origin Among Teachers in Quebec
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2342907openalex-snapshot
An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3324560openalex-snapshot
Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x026008004openalex-snapshot
Education and the Brain: A Bridge Too Far
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00377openalex-snapshot
A Bridge Too Far – Revisited: Reframing Bruer’s Neuroeducation Argument for Modern Science of Learning Practitioners
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-6524openalex-snapshot
Howard Gardner under fire: the rebel psychologist faces his critics

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4680206openalex-extracted
Refuting Neuroscience Misconceptions to Enhance Research Policy in Neuromarketing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781394393695.ch5openalex-snapshot
Differentiation Through the Lens of Metaphors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.13040-4openalex-snapshot
Neurocognitive and physiological measurment of STEM learning processes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2025.100250openalex-snapshot
Seen through teachers’ eyes: Neuromyths and their application in Malaysian classrooms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2025.100260openalex-snapshot
Pre-service teachers’ misconceptions about brain and mind–prevalence and predictors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2026.2657846openalex-snapshot
Neuromarketing myths: a conceptual framework and empirical insights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12294openalex-snapshot
Measuring Educational Neuromyths: Lessons for Future Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10525629261458400openalex-snapshot
Advancing Practices in Management Pedagogy Through Kolb’s Learning Style Theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2101openalex-snapshot
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2101.08openalex-snapshot
Differences between concepts of brain development in modern neurobiology and teachers’ knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2020.8456openalex-snapshot
Determining Biology Teachers' Neuromyths and Knowledge About Brain Functions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2023.12089openalex-snapshot
Myths or Facts: Prevalence, and Predictors of Neuromyths among Turkish Teachers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17227/ted.num60-21928openalex-snapshot
Prevalência dos Estilos de Aprendizagem em Livros Didáticos de Ciências da Natureza
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17244/eku.1256588openalex-snapshot
Neuromyths in Education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21723/riaee.v18i00.17992openalex-snapshot
Equívocos conceituais são difíceis de morrer
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12035openalex-snapshot
An interview with Howard Gardner: John H. and Elisabeth A. Hobbs research professor of cognition and education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.781735openalex-snapshot
Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence Among South Indian School Teachers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720706openalex-snapshot
“Neuromyths” and Multiple Intelligences (MI) Theory: A Comment on Gardner, 2020
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920851openalex-snapshot
A Conceptual Analysis of the Semantic Use of Multiple Intelligences Theory and Implications for Teacher Education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1217288openalex-snapshot
Why multiple intelligences theory is a neuromyth
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.35826/ijoess.2996openalex-snapshot
DETERMINING CANDIDATE SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS KNOWLEDGE ABOUT BRAIN FUNCTIONS A
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.36315/2023inpact119openalex-snapshot
USING MULTIPLE STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS NEUROMYTHS IN PRESERVICE TEACHERS
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3917/raised.025.0119openalex-snapshot
Du cerveau à la classe, un pont toujours aussi loin ?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.46997/revecuatneurol30200026openalex-snapshot
Prevalencia de neuromitos en académicos universitarios de Chile.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.54167/qvadrata.v7i13.1831openalex-snapshot
Prácticas educativas emergentes: la docencia en el nivel superior como herramienta de vinculación y responsabilidad social
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.56383/zevv4282openalex-snapshot
Brain development and maturation in the context of learning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2024.07190openalex-snapshot
Neuromyths about movement and the brain: debunking misconceptions
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.