On the public citation graph
Empirical research on folk moral objectivism
0 signed · 107 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444308709.ch6openalex-snapshot
A Defense of the Use of Intuitions in Philosophy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05854-6_20openalex-snapshot
Philosophische Untersuchungen
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-007-9081-7openalex-snapshot
The Argument from Moral Experience
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9220-6openalex-snapshot
Indeterminacy and variability in meta-ethics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1412-1openalex-snapshot
Intuitions, reflective judgments, and experimental philosophy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-009-0013-4openalex-snapshot
The Perceived Objectivity of Ethical Beliefs: Psychological Findings and Implications for Public Policy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-016-0300-9openalex-snapshot
Revisiting Folk Moral Realism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0400-9openalex-snapshot
Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0401-8openalex-snapshot
How to Measure Moral Realism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-019-00447-8openalex-snapshot
Anti-Realist Pluralism: a New Approach to Folk Metaethics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-017-0115-9openalex-snapshot
Folk Platitudes as the Explananda of Philosophical Metaethics: Are They Accurate? And Do They Help or Hinder Inquiry?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.007openalex-snapshot
The psychology of meta-ethics: Exploring objectivism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.014openalex-snapshot
Can only one person be right? The development of objectivism and social preferences regarding widely shared and controversial moral beliefs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.014openalex-snapshot
Meta-ethics and the mortality: Mortality salience leads people to adopt a less subjectivist morality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.04.007openalex-snapshot
Persistent bias in expert judgments about free will and moral responsibility: A test of the expertise defense
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.07.008openalex-snapshot
Children’s developing metaethical judgments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.006openalex-snapshot
Why are some moral beliefs perceived to be more objective than others?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.013openalex-snapshot
Moral realism as moral motivation: The impact of meta-ethics on everyday decision-making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.014openalex-snapshot
Morality in high definition: Emotion differentiation calibrates the influence of incidental disgust on moral judgments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.06.008openalex-snapshot
Exposure to moral relativism compromises moral behavior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.01.003openalex-snapshot
Without God, everything is permitted? The reciprocal influence of religious and meta-ethical beliefs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.012openalex-snapshot
Moral objectivism and a punishing God
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.04.005openalex-snapshot
Folk moral objectivism and its measurement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107475openalex-snapshot
Theory of Mind network activity is associated with metaethical judgment: An item analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00160-4openalex-snapshot
Are children moral objectivists? Children's judgments about moral and response-dependent properties
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511624612openalex-snapshot
Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x17001911openalex-snapshot
The difference between ice cream and Nazis: Moral externalization and the evolution of human cooperation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000186openalex-snapshot
Does Cleanliness Influence Moral Judgments?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.696openalex-snapshot
Terror management and adults' attachment to their parents: The safe haven remains.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2020.1798280openalex-snapshot
An empirical argument against moral non-cognitivism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0951508042000202354openalex-snapshot
After objectivity: an empirical study of moral judgment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2010.505877openalex-snapshot
Intuitions and relativity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2010.505878openalex-snapshot
How (not) to react to experimental philosophy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.633751openalex-snapshot
The meta-ethical grounding of our moral beliefs: Evidence for meta-ethical pluralism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2012.696327openalex-snapshot
Moral intuitions: Are philosophers experts?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1174843openalex-snapshot
Moral objectivism across the lifespan
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2018.1540775openalex-snapshot
The experience machine and the expertise defense
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2019.1627304openalex-snapshot
The meta-ethical significance of experiments about folk moral objectivism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790701305871openalex-snapshot
THE RISE AND FALL OF EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790701305921openalex-snapshot
THE PAST AND FUTURE OF EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718765.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718765.003.0003openalex-snapshot
The Cognitive Mechanisms of Intolerance*
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/60.1.167openalex-snapshot
Two Conceptions of Moral Realism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198807520.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Philosophy Within Its Proper Bounds
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12380openalex-snapshot
The Influence of Social Interaction on Intuitions of Objectivity and Subjectivity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00701.xopenalex-snapshot
Children's Thinking About Diversity of Belief in the Early School Years: Judgments of Relativism, Tolerance, and Disagreeing Persons
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2011.01428.xopenalex-snapshot
Folk Moral Relativism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2012.01438.xopenalex-snapshot
Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non‐Philosophers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.2007.00160.xopenalex-snapshot
The Epistemology of Thought Experiments: First Person versus Third Person Approaches
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-6077.2009.00168.xopenalex-snapshot
MIXED‐UP META‐ETHICS1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00578.xopenalex-snapshot
Experimental Attacks on Intuitions and Answers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-960x.2012.00558.xopenalex-snapshot
MORAL REALISM, FACE‐VALUES AND PRESUMPTIONS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12232openalex-snapshot
Rational learners and metaethics: Universalism, relativism, and evidence from consensus
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12589openalex-snapshot
Empirical research on folk moral objectivism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716openalex-snapshot
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342157openalex-snapshot
Moral Objectivism in Cross-Cultural Perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615583128openalex-snapshot
Does Incidental Disgust Amplify Moral Judgment? A Meta-Analytic Review of Experimental Evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-109-4-586openalex-snapshot
Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.14394/etyka.486openalex-snapshot
The Empirical Study of Folk Metaethics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1129527openalex-snapshot
Preschool Children's Conceptions of Moral and Social Rules
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3121515openalex-snapshot
The Development of Social Knowledge. Morality and Convention
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/sxdahopenalex-snapshot
Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315145211openalex-snapshot
Moral Reality and the Empirical Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213217-2openalex-snapshot
Non-Naturalistic Realism in Metaethics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472594150.ch-009openalex-snapshot
How Different Kinds of Disagreement Impact Folk Metaethical Judgments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5840/thought1948231219openalex-snapshot
Existentialism and Humanism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-4427openalex-snapshot
Moral relativism and moral objectivity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43sup-0193openalex-snapshot
Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4642835openalex-extracted
Are Ethical Explanations Explanatory? Meta-Ethical Beliefs Shape Judgments About Explanations for Social Change
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38971-9_1667-1openalex-snapshot
Morality, Religious and Nonreligious: Meta-Ethics Differences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01228-7openalex-snapshot
Discourse analysis of academic debate of ethics for AGI
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00418-5openalex-snapshot
Moral Relativism, Metalinguistic Negotiation, and the Epistemic Significance of Disagreement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02140-8openalex-snapshot
The presumption of realism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02187-7openalex-snapshot
The folk concept of the good life: neither happiness nor well-being
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04157-8openalex-snapshot
Evolutionary debunking of (arguments for) moral realism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04726-5openalex-snapshot
The normativity objection and the coloring strategy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-05837-xopenalex-snapshot
Reconsidering the challenge to traditional metaethics from empirical research on folk moral objectivism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-020-00362-7openalex-snapshot
Assessor Teaching and the Evolution of Human Morality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105860openalex-snapshot
Are ethical explanations explanatory? Meta-ethical beliefs shape judgments about explanations for social change
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105984openalex-snapshot
Signaling (in)tolerance: Social evaluation and metaethical relativism and objectivism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2023.2225559openalex-snapshot
Counterfactual genealogy and metaethics in Pettit’s The Birth of Ethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2023.2231519openalex-snapshot
How moral adaptability relates to communication and friendship with morally dissimilar others
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2020.1845310openalex-snapshot
Beyond objectivism: new methods for studying metaethical intuitions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2021.1915970openalex-snapshot
The irrationality of folk metaethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2021.1983160openalex-snapshot
Should morality be abolished? An empirical challenge to the argument from intolerance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2022.2139231openalex-snapshot
Folk metaethics and error
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2023.2174422openalex-snapshot
Metaethical intuitions in lay concepts of normative uncertainty
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12920openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Ritual Participation on Perceived Moral Objectivity: A Longitudinal Investigation of the U.S. Adolescents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.70178openalex-snapshot
Toward Sociology of Metaethics: The Effects of Sociopsychological and Demographic Factors on Folk Moral Objectivism (in a Non‐Western Context)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1162/opmi.a.19openalex-snapshot
People Use Norms, Values, Codification, and Enforceability to Determine if a Rule Was Broken
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2021.39.1.81openalex-snapshot
Morality as a Regulator of Divergence: Protecting Against Deviance While Promoting Diversity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.19181/4m.2026.35.1.2openalex-snapshot
Is morality objective? Classification of methods for measuring folk meta-ethical claims
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2024.30.1.2openalex-snapshot
The New Sociology of Morality: Cognitive and Analytical Perspectives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21009/hayula.007.02.05openalex-snapshot
Explication of Mosque Construction Funds from Roadside Charity Donations in the Perspective of Islamic Law Sociology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/36e58openalex-snapshot
Are ethical explanations explanatory? Meta-ethical beliefs shape judgments about explanations for social change
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/62z8copenalex-snapshot
Signaling (in)tolerance: the reputational implications of metaethical relativism and objectivism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1495openalex-snapshot
Misunderstanding Metaethics: Difficulties Measuring Folk Objectivism and Relativism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781003187936openalex-snapshot
Bias, Belief, and Conviction in an Age of Fake Facts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781003187936-8openalex-snapshot
The Psycho-Social Function of Moral Conviction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/63813d0azf8f8z47cbz90fdz1a24050d3715openalex-snapshot
La défaite de la morale : la théorie métaéthique de l'erreur : concept, ontologie, pratique
showing the first 33 of 34 · page through all 34
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.