On the public citation graph
How people decide who is correct when groups of scientists disagree
0 signed · 170 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1906openalex-snapshot
Development and Validation of the Scientific Reasoning Scale
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0145openalex-snapshot
MESSAGE FORMAT AND AUDIENCE VALUES: INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF UNCERTAINTY INFORMATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES ON PERCEIVED RISK
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5216-2_12openalex-snapshot
The Social Epistemology of NIH Consensus Conferences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1openalex-snapshot
Communication and Persuasion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42699-6_1openalex-snapshot
Mining Disinformation and Fake News: Concepts, Methods, and Recent Advancements
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09923-7_20openalex-snapshot
Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8520-9openalex-snapshot
Rational Consensus in Science and Society
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01096169openalex-snapshot
Youth and scientific innovation: The role of young scientists in the development of a new field
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02628698openalex-snapshot
Guidelines for training in the ethical conduct of scientific research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02628699openalex-snapshot
Commentary and criticism on scientific positivism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02894421openalex-snapshot
Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-004-7041-0openalex-snapshot
Conflicting Experts and Dialectical Performance: Adjudication Heuristics for the Layperson
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9217-8openalex-snapshot
Transmuted Expertise: How Technical Non-Experts Can Assess Experts and Expertise
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9218-7openalex-snapshot
Expertise, Argumentation, and the End of Inquiry
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5openalex-snapshot
A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-014-9373-zopenalex-snapshot
Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony in Courts: Lessons from the Bendectin Litigation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-022-00303-8openalex-snapshot
Reducing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among African Americans: the effects of narratives, character’s self-persuasion, and trust in science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9623-2openalex-snapshot
Improving vocational students’ consideration of source information when deciding about science controversies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9638-8openalex-snapshot
How source information shapes lay interpretations of science conflicts: interplay between sourcing, conflict explanation, source evaluation, and claim evaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9261-2openalex-snapshot
Comprehending conflicting science-related texts: graphs as plausibility cues
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-9327(87)90171-2openalex-snapshot
Science speaks to power. The role of experts in policymaking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(82)90228-3openalex-snapshot
Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.04.032openalex-snapshot
Consumer health information on the Internet about carpal tunnel syndrome: Indicators of accuracy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107174openalex-snapshot
Factors influencing fake news rebuttal acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic and the moderating effect of cognitive ability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101087openalex-snapshot
How the live streaming commerce viewers process the persuasive message: An ELM perspective and the moderating effect of mindfulness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2003.10.004openalex-snapshot
The role of scientists in the environmental policy process: a case study from the American west
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.009openalex-snapshot
The gateway belief model: A large-scale replication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102025openalex-snapshot
Comparing the effectiveness of different consensus messages in communicating global environmental issues: The role of referent groups, emotions, and message evaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.002openalex-snapshot
Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.03.008openalex-snapshot
Why do experts disagree? The role of conflict topics and epistemic perspectives in conflict explanations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.12.001openalex-snapshot
The Explaining Conflicting Scientific Claims (ECSC) Questionnaire: Measuring Laypersons’ explanations for conflicts in science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.002openalex-snapshot
The neuroscience of in-group bias
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.10.005openalex-snapshot
The appeal of vague financial forecasts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2022.10.019openalex-snapshot
When experts disagree: interviews with public health experts on health outcomes in the UK 2010–2020
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752openalex-snapshot
Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847openalex-snapshot
Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.636openalex-snapshot
Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480openalex-snapshot
The case for motivated reasoning.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025185openalex-snapshot
Uncertainty forecasts improve weather-related decisions and attenuate the effects of forecast error.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/e578192014-270openalex-snapshot
Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/478007aopenalex-snapshot
The voice of science: let's agree to disagree
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/503335aopenalex-snapshot
Policy: Twenty tips for interpreting scientific claims
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2013.8openalex-snapshot
Scientific dissent and public policy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0609-514openalex-snapshot
Science communication reconsidered
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01115-7openalex-snapshot
Trust in science, social consensus and vaccine confidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1989.9928930openalex-snapshot
Sheepfarming after Chernobyl: A Case Study in Communicating Scientific Information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1999.10673580openalex-snapshot
Moderating Effects of Need for Cognition on Responses to Positively versus Negatively Framed Advertising Messages
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2019.1610305openalex-snapshot
Readers’ Processing and Use of Source Information as a Function of Its Usefulness to Explain Conflicting Scientific Claims
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.1372284openalex-snapshot
Modeling Attitudes Toward Science: Development and Validation of the Credibility of Science Scale
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.794872openalex-snapshot
Facing the Incompleteness of Epistemic Trust: Managing Dependence in Scientific Practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/03610911003650383openalex-snapshot
How Big is a Big Odds Ratio? Interpreting the Magnitudes of Odds Ratios in Epidemiological Studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758609376128openalex-snapshot
Cognitive processing of persuasive message cues: A meta‐analytic review of the effects of supporting information on attitudes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2151327openalex-snapshot
Nature of science in students’ discussions on disagreement between scientists following a narrative about health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi accident
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.831685openalex-snapshot
The “Trust” Heuristic: Arguments from Authority in Public Health
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1859723openalex-snapshot
The Politicization of Health and Science: Role of Political Cues in Shaping the Beliefs of the Vaccine-Autism Link
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2077163openalex-snapshot
Effects of Exposure to Conflicting Information About Mammography on Cancer Information Overload, Perceived Scientists’ Credibility, and Perceived Journalists’ Credibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2004.10505153openalex-snapshot
Consumer Responses to Complex Advertisements: The Moderating Role of Need for Cognition, Knowledge, and Gender
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2012.719387openalex-snapshot
How is Scientific Credibility Affected by Communicating Uncertainty? The Case of Endocrine Disrupter Effects on Male Fertility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.585693openalex-snapshot
Communicating Immunization Science: The Genesis and Evolution of the National Network for Immunization Information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2017.1331925openalex-snapshot
Seniors’ dual route of persuasive communications in mobile social media and the moderating role of discretionary time
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246openalex-snapshot
Cultural cognition of scientific consensus
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2012.666760openalex-snapshot
Making sense of uncertainty: advantages and disadvantages of providing an evaluative structure
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.900207openalex-snapshot
Four questions for risk communication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/136698798377042openalex-snapshot
Lay views on uncertainty in environmental health risk assessment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/136698799376763openalex-snapshot
Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1377094openalex-snapshot
Response by Oreskes to “Beyond Counting Climate Consensus”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1377095openalex-snapshot
Response by Cook to “Beyond Counting Climate Consensus”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1548369openalex-snapshot
Psychological Reactance From Reading Basic Facts on Climate Change: The Role of Prior Views and Political Identification
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2165523openalex-snapshot
The Role of Trust in Communicating Scientific Consensus and the Environmental Benefits of Genetically Engineered Crops: Experimental Evidence of a Backfire Effect
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2013.849017openalex-snapshot
From Understanding to Deference: Laypersons' and Medical Students' Views on Conflicts Within Medicine
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/3/3/001openalex-snapshot
Understanding science from the perspective of the sociology of scientific knowledge: an overview
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/8/4/303openalex-snapshot
Laypeople's viewpoints about the reasons for expert controversy regarding food additives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/301openalex-snapshot
Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-12-2015-0200openalex-snapshot
Exploring digital library usage for getting information from the ELM perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-10-2019-0808openalex-snapshot
Green information quality and green brand evaluation: the moderating effects of eco-label credibility and consumer knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-04-2017-0074openalex-snapshot
Factors influencing people’s health knowledge adoption in social media
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12081openalex-snapshot
Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self‐Administered Surveys
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00012.xopenalex-snapshot
Morality Information, Performance Information, and the Distinction Between Trust and Confidence 1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.20040618.xopenalex-snapshot
Erratum to “Further Notes on Public Response to Uncertainty in Risks and Science” by Branden B. Johnson, in Risk Analysis, 23(4), 2003
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0149.1963.tb00813.xopenalex-snapshot
THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00308.xopenalex-snapshot
Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Process1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00341.xopenalex-snapshot
Presenting Uncertainty in Health Risk Assessment: Initial Studies of Its Effects on Risk Perception and Trust
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01324.xopenalex-snapshot
Information Processing of Genetically Modified Food Messages Under Different Motives: An Adaptation of the Multiple‐Motive Heuristic‐Systematic Model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01771.xopenalex-snapshot
Unquestioned Answers or Unanswered Questions: Beliefs About Science Guide Responses to Uncertainty in Climate Change Risk Communication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00137.xopenalex-snapshot
The Evolution of ‘Public Understanding of Science’: Public Engagement as a Tool of Science Policy in the UK
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00093.xopenalex-snapshot
Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12260openalex-snapshot
Applying the Gateway Belief Model to Genetically Modified Food Perceptions: New Insights and Additional Questions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12639openalex-snapshot
Seeing What You Want to See: How Imprecise Uncertainty Ranges Enhance Motivated Reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12883openalex-snapshot
Effects of Acknowledging Uncertainty about Earthquake Risk Estimates on San Francisco Bay Area Residents’ Beliefs, Attitudes, and Intentions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13298openalex-snapshot
Experiments in Lay Cues to the Relative Validity of Positions Taken by Disputing Groups of Scientists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13615openalex-snapshot
The Evolving Field of Risk Communication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12186openalex-snapshot
Rational Irrationality: Modeling Climate Change Belief Polarization Using Bayesian Networks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2002.0090073openalex-snapshot
Indicators of Accuracy of Consumer Health Information on the Internet: A Study of Indicators Relating to Information for Managing Fever in Children in the Home
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-120920-015909openalex-snapshot
A New Dark Age? Truth, Trust, and Environmental Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869402openalex-snapshot
Mapping Recent Development in Scholarship on Fake News and Misinformation, 2008 to 2017: Disciplinary Contribution, Topics, and Impact
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002706293470openalex-snapshot
The Evolution of Ethnocentrism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211416646openalex-snapshot
Boomerang Effects in Science Communication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215605153openalex-snapshot
Descriptive Norms and Involvement in Health and Environmental Behaviors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211064456openalex-snapshot
Science for Others or the Self? Presumed Motives for Science Shape Public Trust in Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/030631285015003002openalex-snapshot
Uncertainty as Symbolic Action in Disputes Among Experts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506059262openalex-snapshot
The (co-)production of public uncertainty: UK scientific advice on mobile phone health risks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070162openalex-snapshot
Public opinion and trust in scientists: the role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510368630openalex-snapshot
Rhetoric, power and legitimacy: A critical analysis of the public policy disputes surrounding stem cell research in Australia (2005–6)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515603271openalex-snapshot
Public perceptions of expert disagreement: Bias and incompetence or a complex and random world?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517706451openalex-snapshot
“Counting votes” in public responses to scientific disputes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517738408openalex-snapshot
Lay Americans’ views of why scientists disagree with each other
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518791094openalex-snapshot
In consensus we trust? Persuasive effects of scientific consensus communication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519880319openalex-snapshot
Americans’ views of scientists’ motivations for scientific work
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520942122openalex-snapshot
A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520964931openalex-snapshot
Lay beliefs about scientists’ relations with their employers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221098539openalex-snapshot
Establishing an everyday scientific reasoning scale to learn how non-scientists reason with science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547001023002004openalex-snapshot
Science Mass Communication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/107554700202400104openalex-snapshot
How Involvement, Citation Style, and Funding Source Affect the Credibility of University Scientists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017748948openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Perceived Scientific and Social Consensus on Scientific Beliefs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018769907openalex-snapshot
Neutralizing the Effect of Political Worldviews by Communicating Scientific Agreement: A Thought-Listing Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020949547openalex-snapshot
Reassessing the Variables Used to Measure Public Perceptions of Scientists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470211022024openalex-snapshot
Debunking Misinformation About Genetically Modified Food Safety on Social Media: Can Heuristic Cues Mitigate Biased Assimilation?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470211054446openalex-snapshot
Can’t You All Just Get Along? Effects of Scientific Disagreement and Incivility on Attention to and Trust in Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909607300415openalex-snapshot
How Message Evaluation and Source Attributes May Influence Credibility Assessment and Belief Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217737855openalex-snapshot
Do partisanship and politicization undermine the impact of a scientific consensus message about climate change?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2541-4openalex-snapshot
Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20161574openalex-snapshot
Does Science Advance One Funeral at a Time?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1353/epi.0.0001openalex-snapshot
Masking Disagreement among Experts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118489openalex-snapshot
The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change as a Gateway Belief: Experimental Evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139309openalex-snapshot
Measuring Laypeople’s Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200295openalex-snapshot
Changes in perceived scientific consensus shift beliefs about climate change and GM food safety
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211269openalex-snapshot
Why do scientists disagree? Explaining and improving measures of the perceived causes of scientific disputes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.741openalex-snapshot
Numeracy Skill And The Communication, Comprehension, And Use Of Risk-Benefit Information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1504/ijgenvi.2008.017257openalex-snapshot
Trust, Confidence and Cooperation model: a framework for understanding the relation between trust and Risk Perception
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00305openalex-snapshot
Is This Review Believable? A Study of Factors Affecting the Credibility of Online Consumer Reviews from an ELM Perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2009.184036openalex-snapshot
Community-Based Participatory Research Contributions to Intervention Research: The Intersection of Science and Practice to Improve Health Equity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3392532openalex-snapshot
Americans’ Views of Cues to the Relative Credibility of Disputing Groups of Scientists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2196/27832openalex-snapshot
Communicating Scientific Uncertainty About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Online Experimental Study of an Uncertainty-Normalizing Strategy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2011.39.1.71openalex-snapshot
The effects of online reviews on purchasing intention: The moderating role of need for cognition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1270020openalex-snapshot
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2064275openalex-snapshot
The Reception of Unconventional Science.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2068552openalex-snapshot
The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2110965openalex-snapshot
Citizen Knowledge and Choices on the Complex Issue of Nuclear Energy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2290095openalex-snapshot
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/258792openalex-snapshot
An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3102264openalex-snapshot
The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3104685openalex-snapshot
The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/797336openalex-snapshot
Scientific Expert Testimony and Intellectual Due Process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.25384/sage.c.4650755openalex-snapshot
Mapping Recent Development in Scholarship on Fake News and Misinformation, 2008 to 2017: Disciplinary Contribution, Topics, and Impact
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2011.0013openalex-snapshot
Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.826162openalex-snapshot
“Even We Are Confused”: A Thematic Analysis of Professionals' Perceptions of Processed Foods and Challenges for Communication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050085openalex-snapshot
The Influence of Situational Constraints on Consumers’ Evaluation and Use of Online Reviews: A Heuristic-Systematic Model Perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2017010102openalex-snapshot
Factors Influence Intention to Adopt Internet Medical Information on Bulletin Boards
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203140710-16openalex-snapshot
Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24348410openalex-snapshot
An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust: Past, Present, and Future
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5840/bjp20102116openalex-snapshot
Trust in Experts: Contextual Patterns of Warranted Epistemic Dependence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-3595openalex-snapshot
Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226113623.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Rethinking Expertise
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4734661openalex-extracted
Americans’ Views of Scientists’ Disputes: Why They Happen, How to Tell Which Side is Correct
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-05212-2openalex-snapshot
The value of epistemic trust in public experts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20476openalex-snapshot
Why authors of research papers must provide evidence of ethical research practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105731openalex-snapshot
Communicating natural hazards science advice: Understanding scientists', decision-makers’, and the public's perceptions of the scientific process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-2843openalex-snapshot
Actionable Weather Communication Recommendations for Hard-to-Reach Populations Using Topic Modeling and Thematic Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2025.2569440openalex-snapshot
The utility of expert knowledge in aggregated risk registers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/09636625251410494openalex-snapshot
Communicating scientific uncertainties: Effects of message and audience characteristics in the context of microplastic health risks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10755470241304389openalex-snapshot
When Trust Matters: Perceived Characteristics of Behavioral Guidance as Moderators of Trust in Compliance Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1366995openalex-snapshot
Differences in perceived sources of uncertainty in natural hazards science advice: lessons for cross-disciplinary communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1868729openalex-snapshot
Acceptable risk as a psychological judgment: risk perception, trust, and fairness
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.