On the public citation graph

Measuring Laypeople’s Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI)

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139309
0 signed · 424 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118899151openalex-snapshot
Information Evaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410114openalex-snapshot
Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410070204openalex-snapshot
Measuring epistemic authority: studies of politicians and professors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12770-0openalex-snapshot
Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01096860openalex-snapshot
Trust in science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9089-yopenalex-snapshot
Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: are students epistemically active?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9210-xopenalex-snapshot
Scientific Research and the Public Trust
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.012openalex-snapshot
The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children’s vigilance towards deception
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.06.002openalex-snapshot
Believing what you’re told: Young children’s trust in unexpected testimony about the physical world
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.007openalex-snapshot
Learning to trust and trusting to learn: a theoretical framework
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(05)37006-7openalex-snapshot
Says Who?: Epistemic Authority Effects in Social Judgment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511691904.006openalex-snapshot
Who knows what and who can we believe? Epistemological beliefs are beliefs about knowledge (mostly) to be attained from others
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.16openalex-snapshot
The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/14805-030openalex-snapshot
Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034291openalex-snapshot
More than meets the eye: Young children’s trust in claims that defy their perceptions.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/495426aopenalex-snapshot
Open access: The true cost of science publishing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.921572openalex-snapshot
The Public's Bounded Understanding of Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191openalex-snapshot
Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers' Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.652213openalex-snapshot
Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Trust
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376464openalex-snapshot
Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.831685openalex-snapshot
The “Trust” Heuristic: Arguments from Authority in Public Health
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978109368075openalex-snapshot
Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2013.849017openalex-snapshot
From Understanding to Deference: Laypersons' and Medical Students' Views on Conflicts Within Medicine
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/267745openalex-snapshot
Dimensions for Evaluating the Acceptability of Message Sources
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032openalex-snapshot
The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00247_1openalex-snapshot
Shifting ontological boundaries: how Japanese‐ and English‐speaking children generalize names for animals and artifacts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12046openalex-snapshot
To the letter: Early readers trust print‐based over oral instructions to guide their actions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12054openalex-snapshot
Children's trust in unexpected oral versus printed suggestions: Limitations of the power of print
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12029openalex-snapshot
Informants' Traits Weigh Heavily in Young Children's Trust in Testimony and in Their Epistemic Inferences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12324openalex-snapshot
The Roles of Intuition and Informants’ Expertise in Children's Epistemic Trust
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12059openalex-snapshot
When do children trust the expert? Benevolence information influences children's trust more than expertise
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12187openalex-snapshot
Can't stop believing: inhibitory control and resistance to misleading testimony
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01135.xopenalex-snapshot
Epistemic trust: modeling children’s reasoning about others’ knowledge and intent
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.xopenalex-snapshot
Epistemic Vigilance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00842.xopenalex-snapshot
The Determinants of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: An Empirical Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01108.xopenalex-snapshot
The Feasibility of Folk Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232329openalex-snapshot
Science, New Media, and the Public
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/301353.301402openalex-snapshot
Credibility and computing technology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070162openalex-snapshot
Public opinion and trust in scientists: the role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1201_3openalex-snapshot
Simulation Study on Fit Indexes in CFA Based on Data With Slightly Distorted Simple Structure
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035869openalex-snapshot
Research Blogs and the Discussion of Scholarly Information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17877/de290r-6043openalex-snapshot
Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2027007openalex-snapshot
The Role of Trust in Knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3200/joer.99.6.323-338openalex-snapshot
Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2004.1.1.61openalex-snapshot
Is Trust an Epistemological Notion?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03203630openalex-snapshot
GPOWER: A general power analysis program
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781482274400-4openalex-snapshot
“Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400682018.ch-003openalex-snapshot
Communication And Persuasion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335openalex-snapshot
An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-0862openalex-snapshot
Cooperation and its evolution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868openalex-snapshot
Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9033.003.0022openalex-snapshot
Our Pigheaded Core: How We Became Smarter to Be Influenced by Other People

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3908611openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4130381openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4151465openalex-extracted
Ten Key Principles: How to Communicate Climate Change for Effective Public Engagement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21472openalex-snapshot
Employment Negotiations With an Algorithm? How AI as Negotiation Counterpart Would Affect Negotiators' Trust and Subjective Value Expectations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/fee.70014openalex-snapshot
Six elements of effective public engagement with science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.197openalex-snapshot
Task‐Oriented Learning With Multiple Documents: Effects of Topic Familiarity, Author Expertise, and Content Relevance on Document Selection, Processing, and Use
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21468openalex-snapshot
Grasp of evidence: Problematizing and expanding the next generation science standards’ conceptualization of evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/tea.70050openalex-snapshot
Negotiating Science‐in‐the‐Wild
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32284-7_10openalex-snapshot
United Kingdom
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72945-5_10openalex-snapshot
Trust in Science and Scientists: Implications for (Higher) Education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72945-5_11openalex-snapshot
When Play Store Knows How to Deal with Your Kid: Trust in Digital Counselling
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72945-5_2openalex-snapshot
Methodological and Practical Challenges of Interdisciplinary Trust Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4openalex-snapshot
The Pandemic of Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_18openalex-snapshot
On the Conditional Acceptance of Arguments from Expert Opinion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91628-2_5openalex-snapshot
Establishing Trust in Science Communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49084-2_20openalex-snapshot
Science and Health Journalism in the Digital Age and Its Implications on Public Trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54489-7_8openalex-snapshot
News Consumption and the Illiberal Public Sphere During the COVID-19 Pandemic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69510-0_11openalex-snapshot
The Role of Narrative Framings and Latent Meaning Structures in Online Information Processing of Young Professionals–Potentials for an Innovative Mixed Methods Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71385-9_23openalex-snapshot
The Efficacy of Hyper-Realistic Avatars as a Communication Channel
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-11596-6_16openalex-snapshot
Engaging the Public
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-15723-2_10openalex-snapshot
Ecosystem of Trust: A Systems Approach to Trust in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-15723-2_9openalex-snapshot
A Multi-Stakeholder View on Methods to Foster Public Trust in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2_8openalex-snapshot
Trust in Science and the Science of Trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39582-7_6openalex-snapshot
Praxisbeitrag: Quantitative Befragungen
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59466-7_3openalex-snapshot
Wissenschaftskommunikation und Social Media: Neue Akteure, Polarisierung und Vertrauen
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62800-3_150-1openalex-snapshot
Plain Language Summaries: Ziele, Herausforderungen und die Entwicklung evidenzbasierter Richtlinien
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67055-2_150openalex-snapshot
Plain Language Summaries: Ziele, Herausforderungen und die Entwicklung evidenzbasierter Richtlinien
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67740-7_7openalex-snapshot
Zehn evidenzbasierte Kernprinzipien der Klimakommunikation – und wie Hochschulen diese anwenden können
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1289-5_18openalex-snapshot
Challenges in Defining and Measuring Trust and Distrust in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1289-5_19openalex-snapshot
Trust Cues in Content about Science: How the Media Presents Female and Male Scientists Differently
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1289-5_20openalex-snapshot
Identifying Groups of Trust in Science in South Africa and Germany: A Comparative Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1289-5_3openalex-snapshot
The Role of Science Communication in Building Trust in Scientific Expertise
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1289-5_5openalex-snapshot
Celebrity Scientists as Mediators Between Science and the Public in an Acute Health Crisis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1289-5_6openalex-snapshot
Communicative Roles of Scientists in Intertwining Online Public Arenas: An Analytical Framework
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1289-5_9openalex-snapshot
The Devil in the Disciplines: Towards a Science Communication Culture Informed by Field-Specific Self-Reflection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00643-8openalex-snapshot
Demonstrating the effectiveness of two scaffolds for fostering students’ domain perspective reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00724-2openalex-snapshot
University students’ beliefs about science and their relationship with knowledge about science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10907-xopenalex-snapshot
Adolescents’ credibility justifications when evaluating online texts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9421-7openalex-snapshot
Sourcing in Text Comprehension: a Review of Interventions Targeting Sourcing Skills
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-019-09639-0openalex-snapshot
Does Paying Back Pay Off? Effects of Reciprocity and Economic Outcomes on Trust Emergence in Negotiations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09583-yopenalex-snapshot
The Role of Stewards of Trust in Facilitating Trust in Science: A Multistakeholder View
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-026-09732-5openalex-snapshot
Public Trust in Science: A Systematic Literature Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9638-8openalex-snapshot
How source information shapes lay interpretations of science conflicts: interplay between sourcing, conflict explanation, source evaluation, and claim evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00692-7openalex-snapshot
Students Rate the Credibility of Climate Change Information
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09427-zopenalex-snapshot
Sources within sources: The dynamic influence of multiple documents trustworthiness when evaluating and using an embedded source
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-026-09470-4openalex-snapshot
Social regulation of epistemic thinking during collaborative inquiry with multiple documents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-020-00970-wopenalex-snapshot
Wie setzen sich angehende Lehrkräfte mit pädagogischen Situationen auseinander? Eine Analyse von Argumentationsstrukturen und genutzten Informationen
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02203-yopenalex-snapshot
Coping with an antagonistic climate: Researchers' perspectives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-022-00159-6openalex-snapshot
Informiertes Vertrauen in Wissenschaft: Lehren aus der COVID-19 Pandemie für das Verständnis naturwissenschaftlicher Grundbildung (scientific literacy)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-819620-5.00003-5openalex-snapshot
Healer and professional roles
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103641openalex-snapshot
Trust in managerial response offsets negative review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100189openalex-snapshot
“Your argumentation is good”, says the AI vs humans – The role of feedback providers and personalised language for feedback effectiveness
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100368openalex-snapshot
The critical role of trust in adopting AI-powered educational technology for learning: An instrument for measuring student perceptions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100533openalex-snapshot
Can students judge like experts? A large-scale study on the pedagogical quality of AI and human personalized formative feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.019openalex-snapshot
Better to have many opinions than one from an expert? Social validation by one trustworthy source versus the masses in online health forums
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107297openalex-snapshot
Preservice teachers’ recognition of source and content bias in educational application (app) reviews
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108017openalex-snapshot
Revealing complexities when adult readers engage in the credibility evaluation of social media posts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108385openalex-snapshot
Storifying instructional videos on online credibility evaluation: Examining engagement and learning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108547openalex-snapshot
Scaffolding source evaluation during document-based scientific inquiry: The contributions of document mapping and shared criteria scaffolds
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108548openalex-snapshot
Building resilience against online misinformation: A teacher-led training promoting evaluation strategies among lower secondary students
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108729openalex-snapshot
How do source evaluation criteria develop? A microgenetic study of growth of epistemic ideals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101072openalex-snapshot
Parasocial interactions and relationships in science podcasts: A configurative mapping review on digital trust, engagement, and cognitive elaboration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105252openalex-snapshot
Explicit video-based instruction enhanced students’ online credibility evaluation skills: Did storifying instruction matter?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105274openalex-snapshot
Relationships between critical thinking dispositions and evaluation of videos with variation in the level of expertise of the source among middle and high school students
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105326openalex-snapshot
Listening to scientists in immersive videos: How levels of immersion and points of view influence learning experiences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102192openalex-snapshot
Differentiating behavioral trust and trustworthiness beliefs to improve science communication practice and research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102201openalex-snapshot
What is trust (in science and scientists) and is it in crisis?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102215openalex-snapshot
Global studies on trust in science suggest new theoretical and methodological directions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102235openalex-snapshot
Science communication and public trust in science through an audience-centered quality perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102250openalex-snapshot
Trust in science amid a replication crisis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2026.100262openalex-snapshot
On the defensive: reactance and trustworthiness in processing written information about climate change
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.11.001openalex-snapshot
Forecasting: theory and practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101367openalex-snapshot
Dealing with disagreement: The roles of topic familiarity and disagreement explanation in evaluation of conflicting expert claims and sources
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102121openalex-snapshot
Jargon avoidance in the public communication of science: Single- or double-edged sword for information evaluation?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102685openalex-snapshot
Did 5G radiation really kill birds? Training lower secondary students in epistemic strategies to counter online misinformation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scoms.2016.10.003openalex-snapshot
Disclose your flaws! Admission positively affects the perceived trustworthiness of an expert science blogger
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104134openalex-snapshot
When perceived informativity is not enough. How teachers perceive and interpret statistical results of educational research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101261openalex-snapshot
The role of tie strength in assessing credibility of scientific content on facebook
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102015openalex-snapshot
Fostering critical evaluation of online information sources across the curriculum
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.079openalex-snapshot
Willingness to vaccinate against SARS-CoV-2: The role of reasoning biases and conspiracist ideation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126198openalex-snapshot
Identifying Psychological Predictors of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: A Machine Learning Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980021000124openalex-snapshot
Associations between conflicting nutrition information, nutrition confusion and backlash among consumers in the UK
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000300openalex-snapshot
Unraveling the “smart but evil” stereotype: Pre-service teachers' evaluations of educational psychology researchers versus teachers as sources of information
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000307openalex-snapshot
The role of collaborative argumentation in future teachers' selection of online information
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000310openalex-snapshot
Evidence-informed teaching and practice-informed research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000497openalex-snapshot
Mad Scientists, Bad Impressions?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000499openalex-snapshot
Just Like a Human? An Experimental Study on University Students’ Perceptions of Warmth and Benevolence Towards Chatbots
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000570openalex-snapshot
A Randomized Controlled Study on the Effectiveness of Plain Language Summaries of Psychological Meta-Analyses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000492openalex-snapshot
Longtime nemeses or cordial allies? How individuals mentally relate science and religion.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000489openalex-snapshot
Science communication gets personal: Ambivalent effects of self-disclosure in science communication on trust in science.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01461-yopenalex-snapshot
Civil disobedience by scientists helps press for urgent climate action
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02060-xopenalex-snapshot
The effect of seeing scientists as intellectually humble on trust in scientists and their research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02090-5openalex-snapshot
Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04100-7openalex-snapshot
Perceptions of science, science communication, and climate change attitudes in 68 countries – the TISP dataset
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96333-8openalex-snapshot
The impacts of expertise, conflict, and scientific literacy on trust and belief in scientific disagreements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-026-00409-8openalex-snapshot
Navigating the credibility risks of environmental scientists’ activism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00982-9openalex-snapshot
Facing the pandemic with trust in science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03909-2openalex-snapshot
Consistent effects of science and scientist characteristics on public trust across political regimes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07033-1openalex-snapshot
Navigating the two worlds of academic and public communication: the case of sociologists in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/is.00008.hanopenalex-snapshot
Persuasion in science communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.338.03labopenalex-snapshot
Public disagreements among health experts and their polarizing effects during a pandemic health crisis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2023.2174487openalex-snapshot
The Limits of Reasoning: Students’ Evaluations of Anecdotal, Descriptive, Correlational, and Causal Evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2025.2477719openalex-snapshot
What Makes Sources Credible? How Source Features Shape Evaluation of Scientific Information
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1349662openalex-snapshot
Informed Reflexivity: Enacting Epistemic Virtue
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1784012openalex-snapshot
Sealing the gateways for post-truthism: Reestablishing the epistemic authority of science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2025.2584975openalex-snapshot
Epistemic rights in tension and accord: Expanding the analysis of source evaluation criteria
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2026.2717081openalex-snapshot
The framework of prior knowledge in online credibility evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2025.2533358openalex-snapshot
Between transparency and trust: identifying key factors in AI system perception
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2023.2197692openalex-snapshot
Social justice reasoning when students learn about social issues using multiple texts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2024.2339738openalex-snapshot
Effects of a classroom intervention on college students’ sourcing skills: replication and extension study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2026.2639997openalex-snapshot
Who Said What? Confusing Scientists and Laypeople on Social Media
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2020.1723987openalex-snapshot
Introduction to the special issue ‘How adolescents read and learn on the Web: internal and external factors (Introducción al número especial ‘Cómo leen y aprenden los adolescentes en la red: factores internos y externos’)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2026.2643333openalex-snapshot
The care-full craft of feedback in an age of generative AI
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2152244openalex-snapshot
Science communication and public trust in science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2026.2746790openalex-snapshot
Understanding scientific credibility: graduate students’ reasoning about epistemic practices and social certification of scientific knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2024.2331441openalex-snapshot
Whom to ask? Whom to trust? Parents’ preferences for sources of advice on social-emotional parenting issues
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1172296openalex-snapshot
Believing in Expertise: How Authors’ Credentials and Language Use Influence the Credibility of Online Health Information
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1912948openalex-snapshot
U.S. Political Partisanship and COVID-19: Risk Information Seeking and Prevention Behaviors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2111638openalex-snapshot
Balance as Credibility? How Presenting One- vs. Two-Sided Messages Affects Ratings of Scientists’ and Politicians’ Trustworthiness
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2146033openalex-snapshot
When Experts Offer Conflicting Information: A Study of Perceived Ambiguity, Information Insufficiency, Trustworthiness and Risk Information Behaviors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2026.2699903openalex-snapshot
“However I Judge it – I Think it’s a Gut Feeling”: Examining (Un)Trustworthiness Cues in YouTube Videos by Real and Feigned Experts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1519165openalex-snapshot
With a View to the Side: YouTube’s Sidebar and YouTuber’s Linguistic Style as Hints for Trust-Related Evaluations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2317274openalex-snapshot
The Honest Broker versus the Epistocrat: Attenuating Distrust in Science by Disentangling Science from Politics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1999348openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Emotion and Government Trust on Individuals’ Risk Information Seeking and Avoidance during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-country Comparison
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2324014openalex-snapshot
The future might be female: how does the public perceive experts?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2023.2297507openalex-snapshot
Cue-taking, populist attitudes, and support for holding a referendum: evidence from survey experiments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2024.2400141openalex-snapshot
The trustworthiness of peers and public discourse: exploring how people navigate numerical dis/misinformation on personal messaging platforms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2023.2268053openalex-snapshot
Examining the Role of Distrust in Science and Social Media Use: Effects on Susceptibility to COVID Misperceptions with Panel Data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2023.2261989openalex-snapshot
From Trust in Source to Trust in Content: How Parents’ Evaluation of Trustworthiness Shifts After First Impressions of an Evidence-Based Parenting Advice App
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1554480x.2026.2691773openalex-snapshot
Functions of epistemic trust within the narratives of scientists with disabilities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1457067openalex-snapshot
Audiences for Science Communication in the United States
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1461673openalex-snapshot
A Short Survey Instrument to Segment Populations According to Their Attitudes Toward Science. Scale Development, Optimization and Assessment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1725086openalex-snapshot
The Role of Scientific Source Credibility and Goodwill in Public Skepticism Toward GM Foods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2153896openalex-snapshot
The Communication of Value Judgements and its Effects on Climate Scientists’ Perceived Trustworthiness
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2211746openalex-snapshot
Communicating Agriculture AI Technologies: How American Agricultural Producers’ Perception of Trustworthiness, Risk Perception, and Emotion Affect Their Likelihood of Adopting Artificial Intelligence in Food Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2024.2436522openalex-snapshot
Digital Climate Rhetoric and the Corrupted Scientist Archetype
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2025.2597443openalex-snapshot
When Scientists Speak Up: Trustworthiness in Advocacy Contexts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2022.2075373openalex-snapshot
How representative surveys measure public (dis)trust in science: A systematisation and analysis of survey items and open-ended questions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2024.2388659openalex-snapshot
Revisiting the classic ABI model of trustworthiness: interactive effects of trustworthiness components on trust in mixed-motive social exchange contexts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2025.2600301openalex-snapshot
Dynamics of trust in science among digitised publics: A two-wave panel study identifying trust groups
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2026.2699080openalex-snapshot
Citizens’ reasons for trust in and distrust of governmental crisis communication in six European countries and the US
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2021.1943763openalex-snapshot
The role of communication professionals in fostering a culture of public engagement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2024.2342039openalex-snapshot
Environmental scientists’ support for public engagement strategy development is predicted by a range of factors, but mostly perceived benefits
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2025.2488398openalex-snapshot
What drives positive science festival evaluations?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2026.2657606openalex-snapshot
Public trust in scientists: exploring the perception and relevance of trust cues in media content
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2019.1684822openalex-snapshot
The replicability crisis and public trust in psychological science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biad037openalex-snapshot
The ECO framework: advancing evidence-based science engagement within environmental research programs and organizations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edad045openalex-snapshot
Is Science for the Rich and Powerful? Investigating the Relation Between Income and Trust in Science Across 145 Countries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edae038openalex-snapshot
Populism, Research Integrity, and Trust. How Science-Related Populist Beliefs Shape the Relationship Between Ethical Conduct and Trust in Scientists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaf055openalex-snapshot
Improving Trust in Science Through Communication? The Role of Mediating and Moderating Factors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac017openalex-snapshot
Trusting on the shoulders of open giants? Open science increases trust in science for the public and academics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190845193.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Digital Grooming
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190845193.002.0004openalex-snapshot
Copyright Page
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190845193.002.0005openalex-snapshot
Dedication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0001openalex-snapshot
Introduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0002openalex-snapshot
Digital Grooming
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0003openalex-snapshot
Digital Sexual Grooming
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0004openalex-snapshot
“You Are Like My Only Friend, Idc If You Are 12”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Digital Ideological Grooming
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0006openalex-snapshot
“Let Them Starve, You Idiots!!! Why Feed VERMIN?”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0007openalex-snapshot
Digital Commercial Grooming
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0008openalex-snapshot
“Your DrugBuddy”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0009openalex-snapshot
Digital Grooming
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Scientific Testimony
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.002.0003openalex-snapshot
Copyright Page
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.002.0004openalex-snapshot
Dedication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.002.0006openalex-snapshot
Preface
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.002.0008openalex-snapshot
List of Figures
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0001openalex-snapshot
Introduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0002openalex-snapshot
Testimony and the Scientific Enterprise
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0003openalex-snapshot
The Nature of Testimony
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0004openalex-snapshot
Scientific Justification as the Basis of Scientific Testimony
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Intra-Scientific Testimony
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0006openalex-snapshot
Public Scientific Testimony I
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0007openalex-snapshot
Public Scientific Testimony II
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0008openalex-snapshot
The Significance of Scentific Testimony
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.003.0009openalex-snapshot
Coda
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857273.005.0001openalex-snapshot
List of Principles
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190848927.013.2openalex-snapshot
Trust and Distrust of Scientific Experts and the Challenges of the Democratization of Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac003openalex-snapshot
Democratic and expert legitimacy: Science, politics and the public during the COVID-19 pandemic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.251896openalex-snapshot
The impact of uncertainty communication on trust in its sources: a systematic review and meta-analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/el-09-2024-0265openalex-snapshot
Developing a scale to measure epistemic trust in open educational resources (OERs)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-07-2022-0208openalex-snapshot
Key insights from climate communication – and how they can inspire sustainability in higher education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-06-2021-0159openalex-snapshot
Predictors and effects of scientific knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/ils-08-2025-0147openalex-snapshot
Contextualizing trust: designing transparent generative artificial intelligence systems for collaborative learning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/haxd70072.2026.11620933openalex-snapshot
Trust in Embodied Conversational Agents: A Cross-Scale Evaluation of HCTS and METI
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icetc66579.2025.11387454openalex-snapshot
Evaluating User Trust in Embodied Conversational Agents for Career Counselling
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/jcdl67857.2025.00011openalex-snapshot
SciCom Wiki: A Digital Library to Support the Science Communication Knowledge Infrastructure for Videos and Podcasts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/siu.2018.8404485openalex-snapshot
Auto-encoder based cognitive analysis of questionnary
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2026.3680672openalex-snapshot
Is Seeing Believing and Hearing Trusting? Exploring the Role of Visual and Vocal Cues in Shaping User Trust in VR News Anchors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/wsc68292.2025.11338972openalex-snapshot
Integrating Expert Trustworthiness Into Digital Twin Models Extracted from Expert Knowledge and Internet of Things Data: A Case Study in Reliability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13569openalex-snapshot
Applying social cognition to feedback chatbots: Enhancing trustworthiness through politeness
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.70011openalex-snapshot
Quality counts? Examining the role of feedback provider and feedback quality on students' feedback perceptions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70192openalex-snapshot
The Property in Intellectual Property: Reputation Is Harder to Share Than Ideas
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12779openalex-snapshot
Examining the structure of credibility evaluation when sixth graders read online texts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/pops.70146openalex-snapshot
Seeing the same evidence differently: Biased assimilation and moral conviction in public evaluations of scientific expertise
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13615openalex-snapshot
The Evolving Field of Risk Communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13813openalex-snapshot
Risk Researchers’ Views About the Goal of Trying to Ensure Policymakers Consider Scientific Evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13991openalex-snapshot
Avoiding Covid‐19 risk information in the United States: The role of attitudes, norms, affect, social dominance orientations, and perceived trustworthiness of scientists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14029openalex-snapshot
Strategic communication as planned behavior for science and risk communication: A theory‐based approach to studying communicator choice
showing the first 200 of 372
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.