On the public citation graph
A Built-In Advantage
0 signed · 71 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511615696openalex-snapshot
The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139058391openalex-snapshot
The Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055406062034openalex-snapshot
The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700009451openalex-snapshot
Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381608090142openalex-snapshot
The Tenth Justice? Consequences of Politicization in the Solicitor General's Office
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/492294openalex-snapshot
Is the Solicitor General an Executive or a Judicial Agent? Caplan's "Tenth Justice"
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195372144.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Friends of the Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewq002openalex-snapshot
US Supreme Court Agenda Setting and the Role of Litigant Status
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024271openalex-snapshot
Above Politics: Credible Commitment and Efficiency in the Design of Public Agencies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/10.2.134openalex-snapshot
Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpl013openalex-snapshot
Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr013openalex-snapshot
Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00067.xopenalex-snapshot
Friends of the Court: Examining the Influence of Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-9216.2005.00085.xopenalex-snapshot
Passing and Strategic Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00111.xopenalex-snapshot
Signals from the Tenth Justice: The Political Role of the Solicitor General in Supreme Court Decision Making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0360-4918.2004.043_7.xopenalex-snapshot
Between Law and Politics: The Solicitor General and the Structuring of Race, Gender, and Reproductive Rights Litigation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1935.tb02979.xopenalex-snapshot
Democracy and the Public Service
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00437.xopenalex-snapshot
Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00438.xopenalex-snapshot
The Separation of Powers and Supreme Court Agenda Setting
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290005300305openalex-snapshot
Why the Haves Don't Always Come Out Ahead: Repeat Players Meet Amici CCuriae for the Disadvantaged
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290405700204openalex-snapshot
Information Provision, Organizational Constraints, and the Decision to Submit an Amicus Curiae Brief in a U.S. Supreme Court Case
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912906298535openalex-snapshot
Lobbyists before the U.S. Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910388185openalex-snapshot
Solicitor General Influence and Agenda Setting on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298804100109openalex-snapshot
Amicus Curiae Briefs By the Solicitor General During the Warren and Burger Courts: a Research Note
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299004300110openalex-snapshot
Supreme Court Support for the Solicitor General: The Effect of Presidential Appointments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299805100210openalex-snapshot
Explaining Executive Success in the U. S. Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x03031004005openalex-snapshot
The Supreme Court, the Solicitor General, and the Separation of Powers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x07309602openalex-snapshot
The Solicitor General's Amicus Curiae Strategies in the Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0900900402openalex-snapshot
Cem: Coarsened Exact Matching in Stata
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2011.tm09599openalex-snapshot
Multivariate Matching Methods That Are Monotonic Imbalance Bounding
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v030.i09openalex-snapshot
cem : Software for Coarsened Exact Matching
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1901733openalex-snapshot
The Tenth Justice: The Solicitor General and the Rule of Law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1964234openalex-snapshot
Ideology, Status, and The Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2110423openalex-snapshot
The Supreme Court and the Presidency.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2111377openalex-snapshot
Lawyers and the U.S. Supreme Court: The Washington Community and Legal Elites
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2111431openalex-snapshot
Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2960277openalex-snapshot
Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3053023openalex-snapshot
Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3053377openalex-snapshot
Do The “Haves” Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3115151openalex-snapshot
Do the “Haves” Come Out Ahead over Time? Applying Galanter's Framework to Decisions of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 1925-1988
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315193496-11openalex-snapshot
New York University Law Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.27-2975openalex-snapshot
Call to order: floor politics in the House and Senate
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.29-4789openalex-snapshot
Deciding to decide: agenda setting in the United States Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-3510openalex-snapshot
The solicitor general: the politics of law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-4789openalex-snapshot
Unsung heroes: federal execucrats making a difference
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-0643openalex-snapshot
The Supreme Court compendium: data, decisions, and developments
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15551-7_3openalex-snapshot
Judicial Independence: Evidence from the Philippine Supreme Court (1970–2003)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2018.12.009openalex-snapshot
Friends with benefits: Case significance, amicus curiae, and agenda setting on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2025.3openalex-snapshot
When the Courtiers Return to the Marble Palace: The Impact of U.S. Supreme Court Lawyers’ Prior Appellate Clerkship Experiences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2026.10014openalex-snapshot
Responsibility Attribution for Supreme Court Decision-Making: Politicization, Partisanship, and Dobbs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2026.10025openalex-snapshot
Merits Positions and Supreme Court Voting on Stays and Injunctions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2018.1463187openalex-snapshot
Going Public: Presidential Impact on Supreme Court Decision-making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2020.1758978openalex-snapshot
The Effect of Ideology and Resource Advantages on Appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/714087openalex-snapshot
Confessions at the Supreme Court: Judicial Response to Solicitor General Error
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/732948openalex-snapshot
Gendered Justice in Comparative Perspective: False Equality and False Difference in Criminal Appeals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12060openalex-snapshot
Supreme Court Justices’ Economic Behaviour: A Multilevel Model Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00606.xopenalex-snapshot
Looking Back to Move Forward: Quantifying Policy Predictions in Political Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12040openalex-snapshot
Litigant Status and Trial Court Appeal Mobilization
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12145openalex-snapshot
Humor and Persuasion: The Effects of Laughter during US Supreme Court's Oral Arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12348openalex-snapshot
The President, the Court, and Policy Implementation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12771openalex-snapshot
Serving the Law or Playing Politics? The Strategic Use of U.S. Attorney Appointments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916663653openalex-snapshot
Representation on the Courts? The Effects of Trial Judges’ Sex and Race
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129211017231openalex-snapshot
The Attorneys’ Gender: Exploring Counsel Success before the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129251348456openalex-snapshot
Mixed Signals? Rethinking How Ideology and Institutional Motivations Shape the Solicitor General’s Positions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x13502219openalex-snapshot
Examining the Effects of Information, Attorney Capability, and Amicus Participation on U.S. Supreme Court Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x211032111openalex-snapshot
The Supreme Court, Ideology, and the Decision to Cite or Borrow from Amicus Curiae Briefs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x241253246openalex-snapshot
Fair Game or Foul Play: Public Perceptions of Solicitor General Involvement in U.S. Supreme Court Cases
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.